IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1169-d319868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale: A Case Study of Shengzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yongzhong Tan

    (Department of Land Management, School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Hang Chen

    (Department of Land Management, School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Kuan Lian

    (Department of Land Management, School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Zhenning Yu

    (School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

The existing evaluation system of cultivated land quality mainly considers the natural quality and utilisation conditions, but without sufficient emphasis on ecological environment, which can’t meet the requirements of the trinity pattern protection policy. This study, using GIS spatial analysis and multifactor comprehensive evaluation method, constructed a comprehensive evaluation index system, and applied it in Shengzhou. The results show that: (1) under the comprehensive evaluation system, the quality of cultivated land was classified into five levels and revealed normal distribution with the third level cultivated land area as the peak, successive reduction to the two poles, and the overall quality was good relatively; (2) A close relationship was observed between the quality grade of cultivated land and the landform, the valley plain with highest cultivated land quality was the main grain-producing areas. However, the cultivated land in mountainous areas was poor relatively, and vulnerable to geological disasters; (3) The quality grade of cultivated land was related to economical activities directly. The high-quality cultivated land resources made these towns the main grain-producing areas with many agricultural industries distribution. This study provided a new assessment approach that can support cultivated land grading, quality improvement, and sustainable usage, as well as providing a reference for related research and application.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongzhong Tan & Hang Chen & Kuan Lian & Zhenning Yu, 2020. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale: A Case Study of Shengzhou, Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1169-:d:319868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Ruoyun & Lu, Qing-Chang & Peng, Zhong-Ren, 2018. "A station-based rail transit network vulnerability measure considering land use dependency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 10-18.
    2. Coyle, Cait & Creamer, Rachel E. & Schulte, Rogier P.O. & O'Sullivan, Lilian & Jordan, Phil, 2016. "A Functional Land Management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 39-48.
    3. Yi Liu & Jie Xue & Dongwei Gui & Jiaqiang Lei & Huaiwei Sun & Guanghui Lv & Zhiwei Zhang, 2018. "Agricultural Oasis Expansion and Its Impact on Oasis Landscape Patterns in the Southern Margin of Tarim Basin, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Vasu, Duraisamy & Srivastava, Rajeev & Patil, Nitin G. & Tiwary, Pramod & Chandran, Padikkal & Kumar Singh, Surendra, 2018. "A comparative assessment of land suitability evaluation methods for agricultural land use planning at village level," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 146-163.
    5. Xiangbin Kong, 2014. "China must protect high-quality arable land," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7486), pages 7-7, February.
    6. Sun, J. & Li, Y.P. & Suo, C. & Liu, Y.R., 2019. "Impacts of irrigation efficiency on agricultural water-land nexus system management under multiple uncertainties—A case study in Amu Darya River basin, Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 76-88.
    7. Xinliang Xu & Liang Wang & Hongyan Cai & Luyao Wang & Luo Liu & Hongzhi Wang, 2017. "The influences of spatiotemporal change of cultivated land on food crop production potential in China," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 485-495, June.
    8. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Pierre Damien Ntihinyurwa & Walter Timo de Vries & Edith Ishimwe Ngenzi, 2019. "Why Tenure Responsive Land-Use Planning Matters: Insights for Land Use Consolidation for Food Security in Rwanda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mei Lu & Xiaohe Gu & Qian Sun & Xu Li & Tianen Chen & Yuchun Pan, 2022. "Production Capacity Evaluation of Farmland Using Long Time Series of Remote Sensing Images," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Shilin Li & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land and Its Underlying Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Xinyi Li & Xiong Wang & Xiaoqing Song, 2021. "Impacts of Agricultural Capitalization on Regional Paddy Field Change: A Production-Factor Substitution Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Xiaofu Lin & Hui Fu, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Cultivated Land Based on the PLUS Model: A Case Study of Haikou City, 1980–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Chengqiang Li & Junxiao Wang & Liang Ge & Yujie Zhou & Shenglu Zhou, 2022. "Optimization of Sample Construction Based on NDVI for Cultivated Land Quality Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Chengxiu Li & Xiuli Wang & Zhengxin Ji & Ling Li & Xiaoke Guan, 2022. "Optimizing the Use of Cultivated Land in China’s Main Grain-Producing Areas from the Dual Perspective of Ecological Security and Leading-Function Zoning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Xiaobing Sun & Quanfeng Li & Xiangbin Kong & Weimin Cai & Bailin Zhang & Ming Lei, 2023. "Spatial Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Quality in an Intensive Agricultural Region of the North China Plain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Yaohan Cheng & Chengxiu Li & Shuting He & Ling Li & Liangyun Dong & Xiuli Wang, 2023. "Coordinated Development Path of Cultivated Land Utilization in Henan Section of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Fengkui Qian & Yuanjun Yu & Xiuru Dong & Hanlong Gu, 2023. "Soil Quality Evaluation Based on a Minimum Data Set (MDS)—A Case Study of Tieling County, Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fei Xu & Yaping Shao & Baogen Xu & Huan Li & Xuefeng Xie & Yan Xu & Lijie Pu, 2023. "Evaluation and Zoning of Cultivated Land Quality Based on a Space–Function–Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Dan Lu & Yahui Wang & Qingyuan Yang & Huiyan He & Kangchuan Su, 2019. "Exploring a Moderate Fallow Scale of Cultivated Land in China from the Perspective of Food Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Sijing Ye & Changqing Song & Yakov Kuzyakov & Feng Cheng & Xiangbin Kong & Zhe Feng & Peichao Gao, 2022. "Preface: Arable Land Quality: Observation, Estimation, Optimization, and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-5, June.
    4. Liu, Chenyu & Song, Changqing & Ye, Sijing & Cheng, Feng & Zhang, Leina & Li, Chao, 2023. "Estimate provincial-level effectiveness of the arable land requisition-compensation balance policy in mainland China in the last 20 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Qiu, Bingwen & Li, Haiwen & Tang, Zhenghong & Chen, Chongcheng & Berry, Joe, 2020. "How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Daniel B Abramson, 2020. "Ancient and current resilience in the Chengdu Plain: Agropolitan development re-‘revisited’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 1372-1397, May.
    7. Chengqiang Li & Junxiao Wang & Liang Ge & Yujie Zhou & Shenglu Zhou, 2022. "Optimization of Sample Construction Based on NDVI for Cultivated Land Quality Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Noguchi, Hiroki & Fuse, Masaaki, 2020. "Rethinking critical node problem for railway networks from the perspective of turn-back operation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 558(C).
    9. Pietro De Marinis & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Guido Sali & Giulio Senes, 2022. "The Rapid and Participatory Assessment of Land Suitability in Development Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Luoman Pu & Junnan Jiang & Menglu Ma & Duan Huang, 2024. "Gaps between Rice Actual and Potential Yields Based on the VPM and GAEZ Models in Heilongjiang Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Xuelei Meng & Yahui Wang & Limin Jia & Lei Li, 2020. "Reliability Optimization of a Railway Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    13. Yang Sheng & Weizhong Liu & Hailiang Xu & Xianchao Gao, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution Characteristics of the Cultivated Land Quality in the Diluvial Fan Terrain of the Arid Region: A Case Study of Jimsar County, Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, August.
    14. Cheng, Mingyang & Yansui Liu, & Zhou, Yang, 2019. "Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry: A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 307-316.
    15. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Zuo, Qiting & Wu, Qingsong & Yu, Lei & Li, Yongping & Fan, Yurui, 2021. "Optimization of uncertain agricultural management considering the framework of water, energy and food," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    17. Xing Liu & Zhaoyang Cai & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Kaige Wang & Fengrong Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Cultivated Land Reserved Resources in Arid Areas Based on Regional Water Balance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(4), pages 1463-1479, March.
    18. Carol Smith & Sadeepa Jayathunga & Pablo Gregorini & Fabiellen C. Pereira & Wendy McWilliam, 2022. "Using Soil Sustainability and Resilience Concepts to Support Future Land Management Practice: A Case Study of Mt Grand Station, Hāwea, New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Jinnan Wu & Jian Long & Lingfei Liu & Juan Li & Hongkai Liao & Mingjiang Zhang & Chang Zhao & Qiusheng Wu, 2018. "Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Toxic Metals in the Agricultural Soil around a Pb/Zn Mining and Smelting Area in Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Hipólito-Valencia, Brígido J. & Mosqueda-Jiménez, Francisco Waldemar & Barajas-Fernández, Juan & Ponce-Ortega, José M., 2021. "Incorporating a seawater desalination scheme in the optimal water use in agricultural activities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1169-:d:319868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.