IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i10p1619-d934346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production Capacity Evaluation of Farmland Using Long Time Series of Remote Sensing Images

Author

Listed:
  • Mei Lu

    (School of Land Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
    Research Center of Information Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Xiaohe Gu

    (Research Center of Information Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Qian Sun

    (Research Center of Information Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xu Li

    (College of Surveying Mapping and Spatial Information, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Tianen Chen

    (Research Center of Information Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Yuchun Pan

    (Research Center of Information Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)

Abstract

Farmland is a crucial resource for the survival and evolution of humans. The accurate evaluation of farmland production capacity (FPC) is of great significance for planting structure optimization, the improvement of low-yield farmland and sustainable utilization. The objective of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the FPC at the county scale using time series remote sensing (RS) images. Taking winter wheat as a benchmark crop, the relations between annual yield and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were established by a multiple linear regression algorithm. The mean and standard deviations (SD) of the multi-year yield of winter wheat were used to evaluate FPC and its instability using the farmland parcels as the basic unit. The results show that the estimation model for annual winter wheat yield performed best in 2011. The R2 of the modeling sample was 0.93, and the RMSE of the testing sample was 368.1 kg/ha. The FPC grades in the south and north of the study area were relatively high with a good stability, while those in the center were low with poor stability. There was a certain correlation between FPC and soil organic matter (SOM), and the correlation coefficient was 0.525 ( p < 0.01). In this study, taking the farmland parcel as a basic unit instead of a pixel, long time series of multi-source RS images with medium resolution were used to monitor the per unit yield of benchmark crops and then evaluate the FPC. This can provide a method for the rapid evaluation of FPC at the county scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei Lu & Xiaohe Gu & Qian Sun & Xu Li & Tianen Chen & Yuchun Pan, 2022. "Production Capacity Evaluation of Farmland Using Long Time Series of Remote Sensing Images," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1619-:d:934346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongzhong Tan & Hang Chen & Kuan Lian & Zhenning Yu, 2020. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale: A Case Study of Shengzhou, Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Chong Zhao & Yong Zhou & Xigui Li & Pengnan Xiao & Jinhui Jiang, 2018. "Assessment of Cultivated Land Productivity and Its Spatial Differentiation in Dongting Lake Region: A Case Study of Yuanjiang City, Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Lu, Hua & Xie, Hualin & Lv, Tiangui & Yao, Guanrong, 2019. "Determinants of cultivated land recuperation in ecologically damaged areas in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 160-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quan Xu & Mengting Jin & Peng Guo, 2022. "A High-Precision Crop Classification Method Based on Time-Series UAV Images," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaobing Sun & Quanfeng Li & Xiangbin Kong & Weimin Cai & Bailin Zhang & Ming Lei, 2023. "Spatial Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Quality in an Intensive Agricultural Region of the North China Plain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Qian Sun & Mingjie Wu & Peiyu Du & Wei Qi & Xinyang Yu, 2022. "Spatial Layout Optimization and Simulation of Cultivated Land Based on the Life Community Theory in a Mountainous and Hilly Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Chengqiang Li & Junxiao Wang & Liang Ge & Yujie Zhou & Shenglu Zhou, 2022. "Optimization of Sample Construction Based on NDVI for Cultivated Land Quality Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Yu, Zhenning & She, Shuoqi & Xia, Chuyu & Luo, Jiaojiao, 2023. "How to solve the dilemma of China’s land fallow policy: Application of voluntary bidding mode in the Yangtze River Delta of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Jiani Ma & Chao Zhang & Wenju Yun & Yahui Lv & Wanling Chen & Dehai Zhu, 2020. "The Temporal Analysis of Regional Cultivated Land Productivity with GPP Based on 2000–2018 MODIS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Chen, Xin & Jiang, Li & Zhang, Guoliang & Meng, Lijun & Pan, Zhihua & Lun, Fei & An, Pingli, 2021. "Green-depressing cropping system: A referential land use practice for fallow to ensure a harmonious human-land relationship in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Qiu, Xin & Jin, Jianjun & He, Rui & Mao, Jiansu, 2022. "The deviation between the willingness and behavior of farmers to adopt electricity-saving tricycles and its influencing factors in Dazu District of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Li, Xiaoliang & Wu, Kening & Yang, Qijun & Hao, Shiheng & Feng, Zhe & Ma, Jinliang, 2023. "Quantitative assessment of cultivated land use intensity in Heilongjiang Province, China, 2001–2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Xinyi Li & Xiong Wang & Xiaoqing Song, 2021. "Impacts of Agricultural Capitalization on Regional Paddy Field Change: A Production-Factor Substitution Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Shilin Li & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land and Its Underlying Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Nan Ke & Xupeng Zhang & Xinhai Lu & Bing Kuang & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors of Eco-Efficiency of Arable Land Utilization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Lei Deng & Lei Chen & Jingjie Zhao & Ruimei Wang, 2021. "Comparative analysis on environmental and economic performance of agricultural cooperatives and smallholder farmers: The case of grape production in Hebei, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Xiuyu Huang & Ying Wang & Wanyi Liang & Zhaojun Wang & Xiao Zhou & Qinqiang Yan, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Low–Carbon Transition of Farmland Use in Coastal Areas of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Pengnan Xiao & Chong Zhao & Yong Zhou & Haoyu Feng & Xigui Li & Jinhui Jiang, 2021. "Study on Land Consolidation Zoning in Hubei Province Based on the Coupling of Neural Network and Cluster Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Jiaxing Pang & Ningfei Wang & Xue Li & Xiang Li & Huiyu Wang & Xingpeng Chen, 2021. "Impact of Economic Development Level and Agricultural Water Use on Agricultural Production Scale in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Xiaoliang Li & Nan Gao & Mingming Yu, 2021. "Discussion on the Unified Survey and Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale for China’s 3rd National Land Survey: A Case Study of Wen County, Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Kassouri, Yacouba & Alola, Andrew Adewale, 2022. "Towards unlocking sustainable land consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: Analysing spatio-temporal variation of built-up land footprint and its determinants," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Chuqiao Han & Binbin Lu & Jianghua Zheng, 2021. "Analysis and Prediction of Land Resources’ Carrying Capacity in 31 Provinces of China from 2008 to 2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Yunxian Yan & Lingqing Wang & Jun Yang, 2022. "The Willingness and Technology Preferences of Farmers and Their Influencing Factors for Soil Remediation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1619-:d:934346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.