IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7781-d847235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Sample Construction Based on NDVI for Cultivated Land Quality Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Chengqiang Li

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Junxiao Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Liang Ge

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yujie Zhou

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Shenglu Zhou

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

The integrated use of remote sensing technology and machine learning models to evaluate cultivated land quality (CLQ) quickly and efficiently is vital for protecting these lands. The effectiveness of machine-learning methods can be profoundly influenced by training samples. However, in the existing research, samples have mainly been constructed by random point (RPO). Little attention has been devoted to the optimization of sample construction, which may affect the accuracy of evaluation results. In this study, we present two optimization methods for sample construction of random patch (RPA) and area sequence patch (ASP). Differing from RPO samples, it aims to include cultivated land area and its size into sample construction. Based on landsat-8 Operational Land Manager images and agricultural land grading data, the proposed sample construction methods were applied to the machine learning model to predict the CLQ in Dongtai City, Jiangsu Province, China. Four machine learning models (the backpropagation neural network, decision tree, random forest (RF), and support vector machine) were compared based on RPO samples to determine the accurate evaluation model. The best machine learning model was selected to compare RPA and ASP samples with RPO samples. Results determined that the RF model generated the highest accuracy. Meanwhile, a high correlation was noted between the cultivated land area and CLQ. Thus, incorporating cultivated land area in the sample construction attributes can improve the prediction accuracy of the model. Among the three sample construction methods, the ASP yielded the highest prediction accuracy, indicating that the use of a large, cultivated land patch as the sample unit can further elevate the model performance. This study provides a new sample construction method for predicting CLQ using a machine learning model, as well as providing a reference for related research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengqiang Li & Junxiao Wang & Liang Ge & Yujie Zhou & Shenglu Zhou, 2022. "Optimization of Sample Construction Based on NDVI for Cultivated Land Quality Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7781-:d:847235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongzhong Tan & Hang Chen & Kuan Lian & Zhenning Yu, 2020. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale: A Case Study of Shengzhou, Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Linghua Duo & Zhenqi Hu, 2018. "Soil Quality Change after Reclaiming Subsidence Land with Yellow River Sediments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Xiangbin Kong, 2014. "China must protect high-quality arable land," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7486), pages 7-7, February.
    4. Mingbang Zhu & Shanshan Liu & Ziqing Xia & Guangxing Wang & Yueming Hu & Zhenhua Liu, 2020. "Crop Growth Stage GPP-Driven Spectral Model for Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality Using GA-BPNN," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Yang Sheng & Weizhong Liu & Hailiang Xu & Xianchao Gao, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution Characteristics of the Cultivated Land Quality in the Diluvial Fan Terrain of the Arid Region: A Case Study of Jimsar County, Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Chen, Yanming & Yao, Mengru & Zhao, Qiqi & Chen, Zhenjie & Jiang, Penghui & Li, Manchun & Chen, Dong, 2021. "Delineation of a basic farmland protection zone based on spatial connectivity and comprehensive quality evaluation: A case study of Changsha City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Yasser M. Zakarya & Mohamed M. Metwaly & Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman & Mohamed R. Metwalli & Georgios Koubouris, 2021. "Optimized Land Use through Integrated Land Suitability and GIS Approach in West El-Minia Governorate, Upper Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Chenjie Lin & Yueming Hu & Zhenhua Liu & Yiping Peng & Lu Wang & Dailiang Peng, 2022. "Estimation of Cultivated Land Quality Based on Soil Hyperspectral Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & He, Huiyan & Xin, Liangjie & Tan, Minghong, 2020. "How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Xiaoxiao Li & Man Yu & Jing Ma & Zhanbin Luo & Fu Chen & Yongjun Yang, 2018. "Identifying the Relationship between Soil Properties and Rice Growth for Improving Consolidated Land in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Xiaoliang Li & Nan Gao & Mingming Yu, 2021. "Discussion on the Unified Survey and Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale for China’s 3rd National Land Survey: A Case Study of Wen County, Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quanfeng Li & Wenhao Guo & Xiaobing Sun & Aizheng Yang & Shijin Qu & Wenfeng Chi, 2021. "The Differentiation in Cultivated Land Quality between Modern Agricultural Areas and Traditional Agricultural Areas: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Chengxiu Li & Xiuli Wang & Zhengxin Ji & Ling Li & Xiaoke Guan, 2022. "Optimizing the Use of Cultivated Land in China’s Main Grain-Producing Areas from the Dual Perspective of Ecological Security and Leading-Function Zoning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Jianhui Dong & Wenju Yun & Kening Wu & Shaoshuai Li & Bingrui Liu & Qiaoyuan Lu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Cultivated Land from 2010 to 2020 in Long’an County, Karst Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Shilin Li & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land and Its Underlying Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Zixuan Wang & Xufeng Fei & Meiling Sheng & Rui Xiao, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial–Temporal Variation in Cultivated Land Quality and Influential Factors in the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River from 2017 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Li Wang & Yong Zhou & Qing Li & Tao Xu & Zhengxiang Wu & Jingyi Liu, 2021. "Application of Three Deep Machine-Learning Algorithms in a Construction Assessment Model of Farmland Quality at the County Scale: Case Study of Xiangzhou, Hubei Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Ziwei Liu & Mingchang Wang & Xingnan Liu & Fengyan Wang & Xiaoyan Li & Jianguo Wang & Guanglei Hou & Shijun Zhao, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment and Warning of Cultivated Land Quality in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Qiu, Bingwen & Li, Haiwen & Tang, Zhenghong & Chen, Chongcheng & Berry, Joe, 2020. "How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Lizardo Reyna & Jarosław Lasota & Lizardo Reyna-Bowen & Lenin Vera-Montenegro & Emil Cristhian Vega-Ponce & Maria Luisa Izaguirre-Mayoral & Ewa Błońska, 2023. "A New Approach to Monitor Soil Microbial Driven C/N Ratio in Temperate Evergreen Coniferous Forests Managed via Sentinel-2 Spectral Imagery," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-8, January.
    11. Yang Sheng & Weizhong Liu & Hailiang Xu & Xianchao Gao, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution Characteristics of the Cultivated Land Quality in the Diluvial Fan Terrain of the Arid Region: A Case Study of Jimsar County, Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, August.
    12. Cheng, Mingyang & Yansui Liu, & Zhou, Yang, 2019. "Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry: A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 307-316.
    13. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Li, Gensheng & Hu, Zhenqi & Li, Pengyu & Yuan, Dongzhu & Wang, Wenjuan & Yang, Kun, 2021. "The optimal framework and model to balance underground coal mining and cropland protection in Jining, eastern China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Xing Liu & Zhaoyang Cai & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Kaige Wang & Fengrong Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Cultivated Land Reserved Resources in Arid Areas Based on Regional Water Balance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(4), pages 1463-1479, March.
    16. Jinnan Wu & Jian Long & Lingfei Liu & Juan Li & Hongkai Liao & Mingjiang Zhang & Chang Zhao & Qiusheng Wu, 2018. "Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Toxic Metals in the Agricultural Soil around a Pb/Zn Mining and Smelting Area in Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Aneta Kowalska & Anna Grobelak & Åsgeir R. Almås & Bal Ram Singh, 2020. "Effect of Biowastes on Soil Remediation, Plant Productivity and Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Wencun Zhou & Zhengjia Liu & Sisi Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Cropland Area and Its Response to Increasing Regional Extreme Weather Events in the Farming-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China during 1992–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Xinyi Li & Xiong Wang & Xiaoqing Song, 2021. "Impacts of Agricultural Capitalization on Regional Paddy Field Change: A Production-Factor Substitution Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Sophia Ioannides & Marios Georgiou & Irene Voukkali & Luca Salvati & Yannis E. Doukas, 2023. "Shaping Sustainable Cities: A Long-Term GIS-Emanated Spatial Analysis of Settlement Growth and Planning in a Coastal Mediterranean European City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7781-:d:847235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.