IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p481-d307796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Factors That Influence Escalator-Related Injuries in Metro Stations Based on Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yingying Xing

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Shengdi Chen

    (School of Transport & Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Street, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Shengxue Zhu

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Traffic and Transportation Security, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian 223003, China)

  • Jian Lu

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Escalator-related injuries have become an important issue in daily metro operation. To reduce the probability and severity of escalator-related injuries, this study conducted a probability and severity analysis of escalator-related injuries by using a Bayesian network to identify the risk factors that affect the escalator safety in metro stations. The Bayesian network structure was constructed based on expert knowledge and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory, and further modified based on conditional-independence test. Then, 950 escalator-related injuries were used to estimate the posterior probabilities of the Bayesian network with expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm. The results of probability analysis indicate that the most influential factor in four passenger behaviors is failing to stand firm ( p = 0.48), followed by carrying out other tasks ( p = 0.32), not holding the handrail ( p = 0.23), and another passenger’s movement ( p = 0.20). Women ( p = 0.64) and elderly people (aged 66 years and above, p = 0.48) are more likely to be involved in escalator-related injuries. Riding an escalator with company ( p = 0.63) has a relatively high likelihood of resulting in escalator-related injuries. The results from the severity analysis show that head and neck injuries seem to be more serious and are more likely to require an ambulance for treatment. Passengers who suffer from entrapment injury tend to claim for compensation. Severe injuries, as expected, significantly increase the probability of a claim for compensation. These findings could provide valuable references for metro operation corporations to understand the characteristics of escalator-related injuries and develop effective injury prevention measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingying Xing & Shengdi Chen & Shengxue Zhu & Jian Lu, 2020. "Analysis Factors That Influence Escalator-Related Injuries in Metro Stations Based on Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:481-:d:307796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauritzen, Steffen L., 1995. "The EM algorithm for graphical association models with missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 191-201, February.
    2. Zhi Yuan & Nima Khakzad & Faisal Khan & Paul Amyotte, 2015. "Risk Analysis of Dust Explosion Scenarios Using Bayesian Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 278-291, February.
    3. Aminreza Neshat & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2015. "Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 1565-1585, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongwei Li & Yuxi Wang & Yingying Xing & Xiaochen Zhao & Ke Wang, 2021. "Contributing Factors Affecting the Severity of Metro Escalator Injuries in the Guangzhou Metro, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Ying Lu & Yueming Lu & Jingwen Wang & Xibei Zhang & Wangsheng Chen, 2022. "Analysis on Causative Factors and Evolution Paths of Blast Furnace Gas Leak Accident," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuroda, Masahiro & Sakakihara, Michio & Geng, Zhi, 2008. "Acceleration of the EM and ECM algorithms using the Aitken [delta]2 method for log-linear models with partially classified data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(15), pages 2332-2338, October.
    2. Zheng Tang & Yijia Li & Xiaofeng Hu & Huanggang Wu, 2019. "Risk Analysis of Urban Dirty Bomb Attacking Based on Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Chen, Yen-Liang & Hu, Hui-Ling, 2006. "An overlapping cluster algorithm to provide non-exhaustive clustering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 762-780, September.
    4. Pengxia Zhao & Tie Li & Biao Wang & Ming Li & Yu Wang & Xiahui Guo & Yue Yu, 2022. "The Scenario Construction and Evolution Method of Casualties in Liquid Ammonia Leakage Based on Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Alhussein Adham Basheer & Elsayed I. Selim & Alaa Ahmed & Adel Kotb, 2024. "Evaluation of Groundwater Resources in the Qeft Area of Egypt: A Geophysical and Geochemical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Croft, J. & Smith, J. Q., 2003. "Discrete mixtures in Bayesian networks with hidden variables: a latent time budget example," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 539-547, January.
    7. Fazia Abdat & Sylvie Leclercq & Xavier Cuny & Claire Tissot, 2014. "Extracting recurrent scenarios from narrative texts using a Bayesian network: Application to serious occupational accidents with movement disturbance," Post-Print hal-01578382, HAL.
    8. Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2009. "Regimes in social-cultural events-driven activity sequences: Modelling approach and empirical application," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 311-322, May.
    9. Langseth, Helge & Portinale, Luigi, 2007. "Bayesian networks in reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 92-108.
    10. Christopher Raphael, 2003. "Bayesian Networks with Degenerate Gaussian Distributions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 235-263, June.
    11. Esma Nur Cinicioglu & Gül Huyugüzel Kışla & A. Özlem Önder & Y. Gülnur Muradoğlu, 2024. "The Changing Behavior of the European Credit Default Swap Spreads During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Bayesian Network Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(3), pages 1213-1254, March.
    12. Yi Cao & Xiaoquan Liu & Jia Zhai & Shan Hua, 2022. "A two‐stage Bayesian network model for corporate bankruptcy prediction," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 455-472, January.
    13. Hongyu Wang & Jian Tang & Pengpeng Xu & Rundong Chen & Haona Yao, 2022. "Research on the Influence Mechanism of Street Vitality in Mountainous Cities Based on a Bayesian Network: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Minjeong Jeon & Frank Rijmen & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2013. "Modeling Differential Item Functioning Using a Generalization of the Multiple-Group Bifactor Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(1), pages 32-60, February.
    15. Zhou, Ying & Li, Chenshuang & Zhou, Cheng & Luo, Hanbin, 2018. "Using Bayesian network for safety risk analysis of diaphragm wall deflection based on field data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 152-167.
    16. Claudia Tarantola & Paola Vicard & Ioannis Ntzoufras, 2012. "Monitoring and Improving Greek Banking Services Using Bayesian Networks: an Analysis of Mystery Shopping Data," Quaderni di Dipartimento 160, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    17. Silvia Salini & Ron Kenett, 2009. "Bayesian networks of customer satisfaction survey data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11), pages 1177-1189.
    18. Haifeng Bian & Jun Zhang & Ruixue Li & Huanhuan Zhao & Xuexue Wang & Yiping Bai, 2021. "Risk analysis of tripping accidents of power grid caused by typical natural hazards based on FTA-BN model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 1771-1795, April.
    19. Sheehan, Barry & Murphy, Finbarr & Mullins, Martin & Ryan, Cian, 2019. "Connected and autonomous vehicles: A cyber-risk classification framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 523-536.
    20. Astrid Kemperman & Pauline van den Berg & Minou Weijs-Perrée & Kevin Uijtdewillegen, 2019. "Loneliness of Older Adults: Social Network and the Living Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:481-:d:307796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.