IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7927-d436523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Structural Equations to Model the Relationships between Procedural Justice, Risky Lifestyles, and Violent Inmate Misconduct

Author

Listed:
  • Jaeyong Choi

    (Department of Security Studies and Criminal Justice, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX 76901, USA)

  • Glen A. Ishoy

    (Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA)

  • Julak Lee

    (Department of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

Abstract

Prior research has consistently shown that perceptions of procedural justice promote individuals’ compliance with the law. Several studies have also identified mechanisms that explain the association between perceptions of procedural justice and compliance (e.g., social identity). However, the potential role of risky behaviors as a mediator of the association between procedural justice and compliance remains unexplored. This study examined whether risky behaviors can mediate the relationship between procedural justice and violent inmate misconduct. Data for this study were derived from a sample of 986 incarcerated felons in South Korea. The present study employed structural equation modeling to test how risky lifestyles mediate the association between procedural justice and violent misconduct. The results showed that procedural justice reduced violent inmate misconduct. Additionally, the mediation hypothesis received partial support: the direct effect of procedural justice on violent misconduct was partially mediated by involvement in risky activities. Taken together, the results highlight the importance of the interrelationship between procedural justice, risky lifestyles, and violent misconduct in a prison setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaeyong Choi & Glen A. Ishoy & Julak Lee, 2020. "Using Structural Equations to Model the Relationships between Procedural Justice, Risky Lifestyles, and Violent Inmate Misconduct," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7927-:d:436523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spano, Richard & Freilich, Joshua D., 2009. "An assessment of the empirical validity and conceptualization of individual level multivariate studies of lifestyle/routine activities theory published from 1995 to 2005," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 305-314, May.
    2. Lorraine Mazerolle & Sarah Bennett & Jacqueline Davis & Elise Sargeant & Matthew Manning, 2013. "Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages -147.
    3. Tom R. Tyler & Jeffrey Fagan & Amanda Geller, 2014. "Street Stops and Police Legitimacy: Teachable Moments in Young Urban Men's Legal Socialization," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 751-785, December.
    4. Colin Bolger, P. & Walters, Glenn D., 2019. "The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 93-99.
    5. Gau, Jacinta M., 2011. "The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical Test of Core Theoretical Propositions," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 489-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crifasi, Cassandra K. & Williams, Rebecca G. & Booty, Marisa D. & Owens-Young, Jessica L. & Webster, Daniel W. & Buggs, Shani A.L., 2022. "Community perspectives on gun violence and safety: The role of policing in Baltimore City," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Steven F. Lehrer & Louis‐Pierre Lepage, 2020. "How Do NYPD Officers Respond to Terror Threats?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(347), pages 638-661, July.
    3. Arabella Kyprianides & Clifford Stott & Ben Bradford, 2021. "‘Playing the Game’: Power, Authority and Procedural Justice in Interactions Between Police and Homeless People in London [‘Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal J," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(3), pages 670-689.
    4. McFarland, Michael J. & Geller, Amanda & McFarland, Cheryl, 2019. "Police contact and health among urban adolescents: The role of perceived injustice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Gau, Jacinta M. & Corsaro, Nicholas & Stewart, Eric A. & Brunson, Rod K., 2012. "Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 333-343.
    6. Colin Bolger, P. & Walters, Glenn D., 2019. "The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 93-99.
    7. Moule, Richard K. & Burruss, George W. & Gifford, Faith E. & Parry, Megan M. & Fox, Bryanna, 2019. "Legal socialization and subcultural norms: Examining linkages between perceptions of procedural justice, legal cynicism, and the code of the street," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 26-39.
    8. Nir, Tal & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2016. "The framed right to participate in municipal youth councils and its educational impact," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 174-183.
    9. Peacock, Robert P., 2022. "The generalizability of public judgments of procedural justice across police interaction and demographic variables," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Miner-Romanoff, Karen, 2023. "Bigs in Blue: Police officer mentoring for middle-school students—Building trust and understanding through structured programming," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Gottlieb, Aaron & Wilson, Robert, 2019. "The effect of direct and vicarious police contact on the educational achievement of urban teens," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 190-199.
    12. Thomas C. O'Brien & Tom R. Tyler & Tracey L. Meares, 2020. "Building popular legitimacy with reconciliatory gestures and participation: A community‐level model of authority," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 821-839, October.
    13. Desmond Ang, 2021. "The Effects of Police Violence on Inner-City Students," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(1), pages 115-168.
    14. Matheson, Catherine M. & Rimmer, Russell & Tinsley, Ross, 2014. "Spiritual attitudes and visitor motivations at the Beltane Fire Festival, Edinburgh," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-33.
    15. Vazsonyi, Alexander T. & Javakhishvili, Magda & Ksinan, Albert J., 2018. "Routine activities and adolescent deviance across 28 cultures," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 56-66.
    16. Alward, Lucas M., 2024. "Procedural justice and probation officer legitimacy: Testing the process-based model in community supervision," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Ferdik, Frank V., 2014. "The influence of strain on law enforcement legitimacy evaluations," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 443-451.
    18. Bolger, Michelle A. & Lytle, Daniel J. & Bolger, P. Colin, 2021. "What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Abril, Veronica & Perez-Vincent, Santiago & Tobon, Santiago & Vanegas-Arias, Martin, 2022. "How to measure public trust in the police? A framework with an application for Colombia," SocArXiv 89shw, Center for Open Science.
    20. Michelle Kondo & Michelle Degli Esposti & Jonathan Jay & Christopher N. Morrison & Bridget Freisthler & Claire Jones & Jingzhen Yang & Deena Chisolm & Charles Branas & Bernadette Hohl, 2022. "Changes in crime surrounding an urban home renovation and rebuild programme," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 1011-1030, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7927-:d:436523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.