IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7476-d428003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust, Connection and Equity: Can Understanding Context Help to Establish Successful Campus Community Gardens?

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Marsh

    (Centre for Rural Health, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Suzanne Mallick

    (Centre for Rural Health, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Emily Flies

    (School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Penelope Jones

    (Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Sue Pearson

    (School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Iain Koolhof

    (School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Jason Byrne

    (School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

  • Dave Kendal

    (School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)

Abstract

Campus community gardens (CCGs) can potentially improve student health and wellbeing, mitigate social and ecological problems, and nurture university-community relationships. However, CCGs are located in complex socio-political and ecological settings and many community gardens struggle or fail. However, few studies have assessed the socio-political/ecological context of a garden setting prior to its development to understand the potential barriers and enablers of success. Our study assessed the socio-spatial context of a proposed CCG at a student university accommodation site. We engaged diverse university and community stakeholders through interviews, focus groups and a survey to explore their perceptions of the space generally and the proposed garden specifically. Visual observations and public life surveying were used to determine patterns of behavior. Results confirmed known problems associated with an underutilized site that provides little opportunity for lingering or contact with nature; and unknown barriers, including socially disconnected stakeholders and community distrust of the university. The research also uncovered positive enablers, such as stakeholder appreciation of the social, wellbeing and ecological benefits that a CCG could deliver. Our findings suggest that an in-depth exploration of a proposed garden context can be an important enabler of its success.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Marsh & Suzanne Mallick & Emily Flies & Penelope Jones & Sue Pearson & Iain Koolhof & Jason Byrne & Dave Kendal, 2020. "Trust, Connection and Equity: Can Understanding Context Help to Establish Successful Campus Community Gardens?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7476-:d:428003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth W. Holt & Quinn K. Lombard & Noelle Best & Sara Smiley-Smith & John E. Quinn, 2019. "Active and Passive Use of Green Space, Health, and Well-Being amongst University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Rebecca Laycock Pedersen & Zoe P. Robinson & Emma Surman, 2019. "Understanding Transience and Participation in University Student-Led Food Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Viniece Jennings & Lincoln Larson & Jessica Yun, 2016. "Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. David R. Johnson & Jared L. Peifer, 2017. "How Public Confidence in Higher Education Varies by Social Context," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(4), pages 619-644, July.
    5. Markus Moos & Nick Revington & Tristan Wilkin & Jean Andrey, 2019. "The knowledge economy city: Gentrification, studentification and youthification, and their connections to universities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1075-1092, May.
    6. Robert Bartłomiejski & Maciej Kowalewski, 2019. "Polish Urban Allotment Gardens as ‘Slow City’ Enclaves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Johan Colding & Stephan Barthel, 2017. "The Role of University Campuses in Reconnecting Humans to the Biosphere," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Leslie A. Duram & Sydney K. Klein, 2015. "University food gardens: a unifying place for higher education sustainability," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3/4), pages 282-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan J. Gamba & Lana Mariko Wood & Adianez Ampil & Alina Engelman & Juleen Lam & Michael T. Schmeltz & Maria M. Pritchard & Joshua Kier Adrian Santillan & Esteban S. Rivera & Nancy Ortiz & Darice Ingr, 2021. "Investigating the Feasibility of a Restaurant Delivery Service to Improve Food Security among College Students Experiencing Marginal Food Security, a Head-to-Head Trial with Grocery Store Gift Cards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Fomba & Zinash Delebo Osunde & Souleymane Sidi Traoré & Appollonia Okhimamhe & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2024. "Urban Green Spaces in Bamako and Sikasso, Mali: Land Use Changes and Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Philip S. Brenner, 2021. "Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(2), pages 939-954, March.
    3. Rui Zhou & Ying-Jing Zheng & Jing-Yi Yun & Hong-Mei Wang, 2022. "The Effects of Urban Green Space on Depressive Symptoms of Mid-Aged and Elderly Urban Residents in China: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. A. Haven Kiers & Billy Krimmel & Caroline Larsen-Bircher & Kate Hayes & Ash Zemenick & Julia Michaels, 2022. "Different Jargon, Same Goals: Collaborations between Landscape Architects and Ecologists to Maximize Biodiversity in Urban Lawn Conversions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Zihe Wang & Gege Yan & Siyuan Wang, 2022. "Fairness Evaluation of Landscape Justice in Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study of the Daxing Part of Yizhuang New Town, Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Jaloliddin Rustamov & Zahiriddin Rustamov & Nazar Zaki, 2023. "Green Space Quality Analysis Using Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Lovely S. Mores & Jeongwoo Lee & Woongkyoo Bae, 2019. "University-Community Partnerships: A Local Planning Co-Production Study on Calabarzon, Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Jayajit Chakraborty & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski, 2016. "Environmental Justice Research: Contemporary Issues and Emerging Topics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-5, November.
    9. Sebastian Bernat & Małgorzata Flaga, 2022. "Cittàslow as An Alternative Path of Town Development and Revitalisation in Peripheral Areas: The Example of The Lublin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Jan Hassink & Lenneke Vaandrager & Yvette Buist & Simone de Bruin, 2019. "Characteristics and Challenges for the Development of Nature-Based Adult Day Services in Urban Areas for People with Dementia and Their Family Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Gbadegesin, Job & Marais, Lochner & Denoon-Stevens, Stuart & Cloete, Jan & Venter, Anita & Rani, Kholisa & Lenka, Molefi & Campbell, Malene & Koetaan, Quintin, 2021. "Studentification and governance in South Africa: Dependencies and conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. April Jackson & Tisha Holmes & Tyler McCreary, 2020. "Gown Goes to Town: Negotiating Mutually Beneficial Relationships between College Students, City Planners, and a Historically Marginalized African-American Neighborhood," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Julia Wójcik-Madej & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2021. "An Assessment of the Ecological Landscape Quality (ELQ) of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) Based on Existing Elements of Green and Blue Infrastructure (GBI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Jie Xu & Yu Xiao & Gaodi Xie & Lin Zhen & Yangyang Wang & Yuan Jiang, 2018. "The Spatio-Temporal Disparities of Areas Benefitting from the Wind Erosion Prevention Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Zelin Zhang & Xiaomin Tang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Intergenerational Equity of Public Open Space in Old Communities: A Case Study of Caoyang New Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Shunwei Ji & Renfeng Ma & Liyan Ren & Caijuan Wang, 2020. "How to Find Vacant Green Space in the Process of Urban Park Planning: Case Study in Ningbo (China)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Xiaoxia Li & Guozhu Xia & Tao Lin & Zhonglin Xu & Yao Wang, 2022. "Construction of Urban Green Space Network in Kashgar City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Demsachew Guadie & Tsegaye Getahun & Kalkidan Asnake & Sebsebe Demissew, 2022. "Multifunctional Urban Green Infrastructure Development in a Sub-Saharan Country: The Case of Friendship Square Park, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Maria Sarapultseva & Alena Zolotareva & Natal’ya Nasretdinova & Alexey Sarapultsev, 2022. "The Healing Environment of Dental Clinics through the Eyes of Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    20. Cristina Matos Silva & Fátima Bernardo & Maria Manso & Isabel Loupa Ramos, 2023. "Green Spaces over a Roof or on the Ground, Does It Matter? The Perception of Ecosystem Services and Potential Restorative Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7476-:d:428003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.