IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5418-d390710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cardiorespiratory and Thermoregulatory Parameters Are Good Surrogates for Measuring Physical Fatigue during a Simulated Construction Task

Author

Listed:
  • Shahnawaz Anwer

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Heng Li

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Waleed Umer

    (Department of Construction Engineering and Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Arnold Y. L. Wong

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

Abstract

Cardiorespiratory (e.g., heart rate and breathing rate) and thermoregulatory (e.g., local skin temperature and electrodermal activity) responses are controlled by the sympathetic nervous system. To cope with increased physical workload, the sympathetic system upregulates its activity to generate greater sympathetic responses (i.e., increased heart rate and respiratory rate). Therefore, physiological measures may have the potential to evaluate changes in physical condition (including fatigue) during functional tasks. This study aimed to quantify physical fatigue using wearable cardiorespiratory and thermoregulatory sensors during a simulated construction task. Twenty-five healthy individuals (mean age, 31.8 ± 1.8 years) were recruited. Participants were instructed to perform 30 min of a simulated manual material handling task in a laboratory. The experimental setup comprised a station A, a 10-metre walking platform, and a station B. Each participant was asked to pick up a 15 kg ergonomically-designed wooden box from station A and then carried it along the platform and dropped it at station B. The task was repeated from B to A and then A to B until the participants perceived a fatigue level > 15 out of 20 on the Borg-20 scale. Heart rate, breathing rate, local skin temperature, and electrodermal activity at the wrist were measured by wearable sensors and the perceived physical fatigue was assessed using the Borg-20 scale at baseline, 15 min, and 30 min from the baseline. There were significant increases in the heart rate (mean changes: 50 ± 13.3 beats/min), breathing rate (mean changes: 9.8 ± 4.1 breaths), local skin temperature (mean changes: 3.4 ± 1.9 °C), electrodermal activity at the right wrist (mean changes: 7.1 ± 3.8 µS/cm), and subjective physical fatigue (mean changes: 8.8 ± 0.6 levels) at the end of the simulated construction task ( p < 0.05). Heart rate and breathing rate at 15 and 30 min were significantly correlated with the corresponding subjective Borg scores ( p < 0.01). Local skin temperature at 30 min was significantly correlated with the corresponding Borg scores ( p < 0.05). However, electrodermal activity at the right wrist was not associated with Borg scores at any time points. The results implied cardiorespiratory parameters and local skin temperature were good surrogates for measuring physical fatigue. Conversely, electrodermal activity at the right wrist was unrelated to physical fatigue. Future field studies should investigate the sensitivity of various cardiorespiratory and thermoregulatory parameters for real time physical fatigue monitoring in construction sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahnawaz Anwer & Heng Li & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari & Waleed Umer & Arnold Y. L. Wong, 2020. "Cardiorespiratory and Thermoregulatory Parameters Are Good Surrogates for Measuring Physical Fatigue during a Simulated Construction Task," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5418-:d:390710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5418/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5418/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ilo:ilowps:470451 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Margaret Chan, 2011. "Fatigue: the most critical accident risk in oil and gas construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 341-353.
    3. Tucker, Philip & Folkard, Simon., 2012. "Working time, health and safety a research synthesis paper," ILO Working Papers 994704513402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denisse Bustos & Joana C. Guedes & Mário P. Vaz & Eduardo Pombo & Ricardo J. Fernandes & José Torres Costa & João Santos Baptista, 2021. "Non-Invasive Physiological Monitoring for Physical Exertion and Fatigue Assessment in Military Personnel: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-28, August.
    2. T. Bradley Willingham & Julie Stowell & George Collier & Deborah Backus, 2024. "Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Expand Accessibility and Improve Precision in Rehabilitation and Exercise for People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paula Franklin & Wouter Zwysen & Agnieszka Piasna, 2022. "Temporal Dimensions of Job Quality and Gender: Exploring Differences in the Associations of Working Time and Health between Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Thomas Leoni, 2019. "Fehlzeitenreport 2019. Krankheits- und unfallbedingte Fehlzeiten in Österreich – Die flexible Arbeitswelt: Arbeitszeit und Gesundheit," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 62103, April.
    3. Stefan Ederer & Gerhard Streicher, 2023. "Makroökonomische Effekte einer Arbeitszeitanpassung in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 70374, April.
    4. Vaishali Dhingra & Rakesh K. Mudgal & Manish Dhingra, 2017. "Safe and Healthy Work Environment: A Study of Artisans of Indian Metalware Handicraft Industry," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 42(2), pages 152-166, May.
    5. Mitra Hannani & Marc Bascompta & Mojtaba Gerami Sabzevar & Hesam Dehghani & Ali Asghar Khajevandi, 2023. "Causal Analysis of Safety Risk Perception of Iranian Coal Mining Workers Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Nathalie Greenan & Majda Seghir, 2017. "Measuring Vulnerability to Adverse Working Conditions: Evidence from European Countries [Mesurer la vulnérabilité à la dégradation des conditions de travail dans les pays européens]," Working Papers hal-02172377, HAL.
    7. Ashley E. Shortz & Ranjana K. Mehta & S. Camille Peres & Mark E. Benden & Qi Zheng, 2019. "Development of the Fatigue Risk Assessment and Management in High-Risk Environments (FRAME) Survey: A Participatory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Anwar S. Alroomi & Sherif Mohamed, 2021. "Occupational Stressors and Safety Behaviour among Oil and Gas Workers in Kuwait: The Mediating Role of Mental Health and Fatigue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Stefan Ederer & Gerhard Streicher, 2023. "Makroökonomische Effekte einer Arbeitszeitanpassung in Österreich," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 49(3), pages 51-77.
    10. repec:ilo:ilowps:486945 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Farnad Nasirzadeh & Mostafa Mir & Sadiq Hussain & Mohammad Tayarani Darbandy & Abbas Khosravi & Saeid Nahavandi & Brad Aisbett, 2020. "Physical Fatigue Detection Using Entropy Analysis of Heart Rate Signals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Messenger, Jon C. & Vidal, Patricia., 2015. "The organization of working time and its effects in the health services sector : a comparative analysis of Brazil, South Africa and the Republic of Korea," ILO Working Papers 994869453402676, International Labour Organization.
    13. Jarno Turunen & Kati Karhula & Annina Ropponen & Aki Koskinen & Rahman Shiri & Mikael Sallinen & Jenni Ervasti & Jaakko Pehkonen & Mikko Härmä, 2022. "The Time-Varying Effect of Participatory Shift Scheduling on Working Hour Characteristics and Sickness Absence: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Sungjin Ahn, 2022. "Derivation of Risk Factors to Quantify the Risk of Safety Accidents for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Jon C. Messenger & Naj Ghosheh, 2013. "Conclusion: Lessons learned from the Great Recession and implications for policy," Chapters, in: Jon C. Messenger & Naj Ghosheh (ed.), Work Sharing during the Great Recession, chapter 8, pages 259-298, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Rita Yi Man Li & Kwong Wing Chau & Frankie Fanjie Zeng, 2019. "Ranking of Risks for Existing and New Building Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Wan-Ju Cheng & Li-Chung Pien & Tomohide Kubo & Yawen Cheng, 2020. "Trends in Work Conditions and Associations with Workers’ Health in Recent 15 Years: The Role of Job Automation Probability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Jon C. Messenger & Naj Ghosheh (ed.), 2013. "Work Sharing during the Great Recession," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15272.
    19. Erinç Yeldan, 2013. "The Turkish experience with work-sharing policy during the global economic crisis, 2008–2010," Chapters, in: Jon C. Messenger & Naj Ghosheh (ed.), Work Sharing during the Great Recession, chapter 5, pages 119-150, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5418-:d:390710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.