IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4717-d378558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Mari Liukka

    (Department of Nursing Science/Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
    South Karelia Social and Health Care District, 53130 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Alison Steven

    (Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)

  • M Flores Vizcaya Moreno

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Arja M Sara-aho

    (Faculty of Health Care & Social Services, LAB University of Applied Sciences, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Jayden Khakurel

    (Research Center for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland)

  • Pauline Pearson

    (Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)

  • Hannele Turunen

    (Department of Nursing Science/Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
    Clinical Development, Education and Research Unit of Nursing (CDERUN), Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland)

  • Susanna Tella

    (Department of Nursing Science/Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
    Faculty of Health Care & Social Services, LAB University of Applied Sciences, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

Abstract

Adverse events are common in healthcare. Three types of victims of patient-related adverse events can be identified. The first type includes patients and their families, the second type includes healthcare professionals involved in an adverse event and the third type includes healthcare organisations in which an adverse event occurs. The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesise knowledge, theory and evidence regarding action after adverse events, based on literature published in the last ten years (2009–2018). In the studies critically evaluated ( n = 25), key themes emerged relating to the first, second and third victim elements. The first victim elements comprise attention to revealing an adverse event, communication after an event, first victim support and complete apology. The second victim elements include second victim support types and services, coping strategies, professional changes after adverse events and learning about adverse event phenomena. The third victim elements consist of organisational action after adverse events, strategy, infrastructure and training and open communication about adverse events. There is a lack of comprehensive models for action after adverse events. This requires understanding of the phenomenon along with ambition to manage adverse events as a whole. When an adverse event is identified and a concern expressed, systematic damage preventing and ameliorating actions should be immediately launched. System-wide development is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mari Liukka & Alison Steven & M Flores Vizcaya Moreno & Arja M Sara-aho & Jayden Khakurel & Pauline Pearson & Hannele Turunen & Susanna Tella, 2020. "Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4717-:d:378558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4717/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4717/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Hannele Turunen & Terese Bondas, 2013. "Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 398-405, September.
    2. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Sujan, Mark, 2015. "An organisation without a memory: A qualitative study of hospital staff perceptions on reporting and organisational learning for patient safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 45-52.
    4. Luke Slawomirski & Ane Auraaen & Nicolaas S. Klazinga, 2017. "The economics of patient safety: Strengthening a value-based approach to reducing patient harm at national level," OECD Health Working Papers 96, OECD Publishing.
    5. Ashley Kable & Brian Kelly & Jon Adams, 2018. "Effects of adverse events in health care on acute care nurses in an Australian context: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 238-246, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmela Rinaldi & Matteo Ratti & Sophia Russotto & Deborah Seys & Kris Vanhaecht & Massimiliano Panella, 2022. "Healthcare Students and Medical Residents as Second Victims: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Hartwig Marung & Reinhard Strametz & Hannah Roesner & Florian Reifferscheid & Rainer Petzina & Victoria Klemm & Milena Trifunovic-Koenig & Stefan Bushuven, 2023. "Second Victims among German Emergency Medical Services Physicians (SeViD-III-Study)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Jeremy Holloway & Owais Sayeed & Donald Jurivich, 2023. "Tellegacy: An Intergenerational Wellness and Health Promotion Project to Reduce Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: A Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Émilie Hudon & Catherine Hudon & Mireille Lambert & Mathieu Bisson & Maud-Christine Chouinard, 2021. "Generic Self-Reported Questionnaires Measuring Self-Management: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(6), pages 855-865, July.
    2. Jenny T van der Steen & Cornelis A van den Bogert & Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet & Soulmaz Fazeli Farsani & René H J Otten & Gerben ter Riet & Lex M Bouter, 2018. "Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Waller, Daniel & Brooks, Fiona & Perry, Lin & Kang, Melissa & Steinbeck, Katharine, 2021. "Australian federal, state and territory policy on the health and wellbeing of young people: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 1065-1076.
    4. Vasja Roblek & Oshane Thorpe & Mirjana Pejic Bach & Andrej Jerman & Maja Meško, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Phadiel Hoosen & Sabirah Adams & Habib Tiliouine & Shazly Savahl, 2022. "Youth and Adolescents’ Perceptions of Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 885-911, June.
    6. Hadi Alizadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi & Safiyeh Damanbagh & Hadi Nazarnia & Mohammad Nazarnia, 2023. "Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social sphere and lessons for crisis management: a literature review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2139-2164, July.
    7. Minunno, Roberto & O'Grady, Timothy & Morrison, Gregory M. & Gruner, Richard L., 2021. "Investigating the embodied energy and carbon of buildings: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of life cycle assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Tania Pearce & Myfanwy Maple & Anthony Shakeshaft & Sarah Wayland & Kathy McKay, 2020. "What is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Dirk Wrede & Tino Stegen & Johann-Matthias Schulenburg, 2020. "Affirmative and silent cyber coverage in traditional insurance policies: Qualitative content analysis of selected insurance products from the German insurance market," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(4), pages 657-689, October.
    10. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Oshane Thorpe & Polona Šprajc, 2020. "The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, September.
    11. Ju‐Yeon Uhm & Mi‐Young Choi & Hyojung Lee, 2020. "School nurses' perceptions regarding barriers and facilitators in caring for children with chronic diseases in school settings: A mixed studies review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 868-880, December.
    12. Saif, Abu Naser Mohammad & Purbasha, Audrika Eshna, 2023. "Cyberbullying among youth in developing countries: A qualitative systematic review with bibliometric analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    13. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    14. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Sapanna Laysiriroj & Walter Wehrmeyer, 2020. "Intergenerational differences of CSR activities in family-run businesses in eastern Thailand," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    18. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    19. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    20. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4717-:d:378558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.