IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i7p2229-d337366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Pearce

    (School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia)

  • Myfanwy Maple

    (School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia)

  • Anthony Shakeshaft

    (National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick Campus, 22–32 King Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia)

  • Sarah Wayland

    (C43A, Jeffrey Miller Admin Building, Cumberland Campus, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia)

  • Kathy McKay

    (Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
    Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK)

Abstract

Co-creation of new knowledge has the potential to speed up the discovery and application of new knowledge into practice. However, the progress of co-creation is hindered by a lack of definitional clarity and inconsistent use of terminology. The aim of this paper is to propose a new standardised definition of co-creation of new knowledge for health interventions based on the existing co-creation literature. The authors completed a systematic search of electronic databases and Google Scholar using 10 of the most frequently used co-creation-related keywords to identify relevant studies. Qualitative content analysis was performed, and two reviewers independently tested the categorisation of papers. Of the 6571 papers retrieved, 42 papers met the inclusion criteria. Examination of the current literature on co-creation demonstrated how the variability of co-creation-related terms can be reduced to four collaborative processes: co-ideation, co-design, co-implementation and co-evaluation. Based on these four processes, a new definition of co-creation of new knowledge for health interventions is proposed. The analysis revealed the need to address the conceptual ambiguity of the definition of “co-creation of new knowledge”. The proposed new definition may help to resolve the current definitional issues relating to co-creation, allowing researchers and policymakers to progress the development of co-creation of new knowledge in research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Pearce & Myfanwy Maple & Anthony Shakeshaft & Sarah Wayland & Kathy McKay, 2020. "What is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2229-:d:337366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rocco Palumbo & Stefania Vezzosi & Paola Picciolli & Alessandro Landini & Carmela Annarumma & Rosalba Manna, 2018. "Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 371-391, September.
    2. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Hannele Turunen & Terese Bondas, 2013. "Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 398-405, September.
    3. Teichmann, Karin & Scholl-Grissemann, Ursula & Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola E., 2016. "The Power of Codesign to Bond Customers to Products and Companies: The Role of Toolkit Support and Creativity," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 15-30.
    4. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    5. Alice Knight & Alys Havard & Anthony Shakeshaft & Myfanwy Maple & Mieke Snijder & Bernie Shakeshaft, 2017. "The Feasibility of Embedding Data Collection into the Routine Service Delivery of a Multi-Component Program for High-Risk Young People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Zhang, Min & Zhao, Xiande & Voss, Chris & Zhu, Guilong, 2016. "Innovating through services, co-creation and supplier integration: Cases from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 289-300.
    7. Marie E. Ward & Aoife De Brún & Deirdre Beirne & Clare Conway & Una Cunningham & Alan English & John Fitzsimons & Eileen Furlong & Yvonne Kane & Alan Kelly & Sinéad McDonnell & Sinead McGinley & Brend, 2018. "Using Co-Design to Develop a Collective Leadership Intervention for Healthcare Teams to Improve Safety Culture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Anna S. Cui & Fang Wu, 2016. "Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 516-538, July.
    9. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cremers, Anne Lia & Janssen, Cato, 2023. "COVID-19-related trauma and the need for organizational healing in a Dutch nursing home," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Narh Opata & Wen Xiao & Angela Abena Nusenu & Stephen Tetteh & Tettey-Wayo John Narh, 2020. "Customer Value Co-Creation in the Automobile Industry: Antecedents, Satisfaction, and Moderation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    2. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Émilie Hudon & Catherine Hudon & Mireille Lambert & Mathieu Bisson & Maud-Christine Chouinard, 2021. "Generic Self-Reported Questionnaires Measuring Self-Management: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(6), pages 855-865, July.
    4. Wenting Ma & Rui Mu & Martin de Jong, 2021. "How Do Political Features Influence the Co-Production of Government Projects? A Case Study of a Medium-Sized Chinese City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Akter, Shahriar & Babu, Mujahid Mohiuddin & Hossain, Md Afnan & Hani, Umme, 2022. "Value co-creation on a shared healthcare platform: Impact on service innovation, perceived value and patient welfare," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 95-106.
    6. Jenny T van der Steen & Cornelis A van den Bogert & Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet & Soulmaz Fazeli Farsani & René H J Otten & Gerben ter Riet & Lex M Bouter, 2018. "Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Waller, Daniel & Brooks, Fiona & Perry, Lin & Kang, Melissa & Steinbeck, Katharine, 2021. "Australian federal, state and territory policy on the health and wellbeing of young people: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 1065-1076.
    8. Vasja Roblek & Oshane Thorpe & Mirjana Pejic Bach & Andrej Jerman & Maja Meško, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Phadiel Hoosen & Sabirah Adams & Habib Tiliouine & Shazly Savahl, 2022. "Youth and Adolescents’ Perceptions of Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 885-911, June.
    10. Hadi Alizadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi & Safiyeh Damanbagh & Hadi Nazarnia & Mohammad Nazarnia, 2023. "Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social sphere and lessons for crisis management: a literature review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2139-2164, July.
    11. Minunno, Roberto & O'Grady, Timothy & Morrison, Gregory M. & Gruner, Richard L., 2021. "Investigating the embodied energy and carbon of buildings: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of life cycle assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Galletta, Simona & Mazzù, Sebastiano & Naciti, Valeria & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2024. "A PRISMA systematic review of greenwashing in the banking industry: A call for action," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Dirk Wrede & Tino Stegen & Johann-Matthias Schulenburg, 2020. "Affirmative and silent cyber coverage in traditional insurance policies: Qualitative content analysis of selected insurance products from the German insurance market," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(4), pages 657-689, October.
    14. Mari Liukka & Alison Steven & M Flores Vizcaya Moreno & Arja M Sara-aho & Jayden Khakurel & Pauline Pearson & Hannele Turunen & Susanna Tella, 2020. "Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Manila Bonciani & Ilaria Corazza & Sabina Rosis, 2022. "The COVID-19 emergency as an opportunity to co-produce an innovative approach to health services provision: the women's antenatal classes move on the web," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(1), pages 59-85, March.
    16. Marta Marsilio & Floriana Fusco & Eleonora Gheduzzi & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2021. "Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Oshane Thorpe & Polona Šprajc, 2020. "The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Monika C. Schuhmacher & Sabine Kuester & Anna-Lena Hanker, 2018. "Investigating Antecedents And Stage-Specific Effects Of Customer Integration Intensity On New Product Success," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-36, May.
    19. Ju‐Yeon Uhm & Mi‐Young Choi & Hyojung Lee, 2020. "School nurses' perceptions regarding barriers and facilitators in caring for children with chronic diseases in school settings: A mixed studies review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 868-880, December.
    20. Saif, Abu Naser Mohammad & Purbasha, Audrika Eshna, 2023. "Cyberbullying among youth in developing countries: A qualitative systematic review with bibliometric analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2229-:d:337366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.