IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3381-d357213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Influence Mechanism of Green Utilization of Agricultural Wastes in Five Provinces of China through Farmers’ Motivation-Cognition-Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Liying Yu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Hongda Liu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Ardjouman Diabate

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Yuyao Qian

    (School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Hagan Sibiri

    (School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Bing Yan

    (School of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

Abstract

Using the theory of motivation, and the theory of planned behavior, this study establishes the “motivation-cognition-behavior” model of green utilization of agricultural waste from the perspective of farmers. In the motivational dimension, eight motivational factors were determined in three sub-dimensions of extrinsic motivation. In the cognitive dimension, three sub-dimensions of subjective norms, behavioral attitude, and perceived behavioral control are also determined. In the behavioral dimension, two sub-dimensions of utilization intention and utilization behavior are specified. Methodologically, a questionnaire on the green utilization of agricultural waste of 704 peasant households in five provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Shaanxi, Gansu, and Sichuan was administered. With the help of the structural equation model, the influence path and the internal mechanism was then analyzed. It is shown that: (1) in relation to the “motivational dimension → cognitive dimension,” extrinsic motivation significantly promotes the cultivation of farmers’ subjective norms, in which positive broken windows theory has a positive effect. In contrast, negative broken windows theory has a negative one. In intrinsic motivation, the behavior attitude of farmers is negative. In the response analysis, farmers can realize that their ability, self-efficacy, response efficacy, and response cost all have a positive impact on farmers’ perceived behavioral control. (2) In relation of the “cognitive dimension → behavioral dimension,” behavioral attitude slightly hinders utilization intention, while subjective norms and perceived behavioral control all contribute to a stronger utilization intention; the utilization intention maintains a positive correlation with the utilization behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Liying Yu & Hongda Liu & Ardjouman Diabate & Yuyao Qian & Hagan Sibiri & Bing Yan, 2020. "Assessing Influence Mechanism of Green Utilization of Agricultural Wastes in Five Provinces of China through Farmers’ Motivation-Cognition-Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3381-:d:357213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianhua Wang & Yuanyuan Deng & Yuting Ma, 2017. "Relationships between Safe Pesticide Practice and Perceived Benefits and Subjective Norm, and the Moderation Role of Information Acquisition: Evidence from 971 Farmers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Hongbin Liu & Yuepeng Zhou, 2018. "Urbanization, Land Use Behavior and Land Quality in Rural China: An Analysis Based on Pressure-Response-Impact Framework and SEM Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Syamsu, Jasmal A. & Karim, Hasmida, 2013. "The Policy Strategy of Rice Straw Utilization of as Feed for Ruminants," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 3(09), pages 1-7, September.
    4. Jasmal A. Syamsu & Hasmida Karim, 2013. "The Policy Strategy of Rice Straw Utilization of as Feed for Ruminants," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 615-621, September.
    5. Jasmal A Syamsu & Hasmida Karim, 2013. "The Policy Strategy of Rice Straw Utilization of as Feed for Ruminants," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 615-621.
    6. Ke He & Junbiao Zhang & Junhui Feng & Ting Hu & Lu Zhang, 2016. "The Impact of Social Capital on farmers' Willingness to Reuse Agricultural Waste for Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 101-108, March.
    7. Alica Stubnova Sparling & David W. Martin & Lillian B. Posey, 2017. "An Evaluation of the Proposed Worker Protection Standard with Respect to Pesticide Exposure and Parkinson’s Disease," Working Papers 6, Davidson College, Department of Economics.
    8. Piyapong Janmaimool, 2017. "Application of Protection Motivation Theory to Investigate Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Junnian Song & Yang Pu & Wei Yang & Jingzheng Ren, 2019. "Highlighting Regional Energy-Economic-Environmental Benefits of Agricultural Bioresources Utilization: An Integrated Model from Life Cycle Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    10. S. Bhuvaneshwari & Hiroshan Hettiarachchi & Jay N. Meegoda, 2019. "Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Monica D. Ramirez-Andreotta & Abigail Tapper & Diamond Clough & Jennifer S. Carrera & Shana Sandhaus, 2019. "Understanding the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations Associated with Community Gardening to Improve Environmental Public Health Prevention and Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
    12. James Q. Wilson, 1961. "The Economy of Patronage," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(4), pages 369-369.
    13. Mijoh A. Gbededo & Kapila Liyanage, 2018. "Identification and Alignment of the Social Aspects of Sustainable Manufacturing with the Theory of Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuo, Yun & Zhi, Kangquan & Pei, Yingshun & Zhuang, Wencan & Chen, Yanhua, 2023. "Combining the role of natural resources development and trade openness on economic growth: New evidence from linear and asymmetric analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Huafang, Huang, 2024. "Efficiency in the markets for natural resources as a force for economic revolution," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Siraphat Padthar & Phaninee Naruetharadhol & Wutthiya Aekthanate Srisathan & Chavis Ketkaew, 2024. "From Linear to Circular Economy: Embracing Digital Innovations for Sustainable Agri-Food Waste Management among Farmers and Retailers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Yin, Qingwei, 2023. "Nexus among financial development and equity market on green economic finance: Fresh insights from European Union," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Dan Qiao & Shuting Xu & Tao Xu & Qinchuan Hao & Zhen Zhong, 2022. "Gap between Willingness and Behaviors: Understanding the Consistency of Farmers’ Green Production in Hainan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Hu, Bangyong & Guo, Man & Zhang, Shuwen, 2023. "The role of fiscal decentralization and natural resources markets in environmental sustainability in OECD," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    7. Kai Zhao & Bintong Yu & Xiaoting Yang, 2023. "The Agricultural–Ecological Benefit of Digital Inclusive Finance Development: Evidence from Straw Burning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Liu, Dayong, 2023. "Does green finance and natural resources agglomeration have potential for green economic growth? Evidence from Asian perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Yao, Zhigang & Liu, Yao, 2023. "How Covid-19 impacts the financing in SMEs: Evidence from private firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1046-1056.
    10. Chen, Wei & Zou, Wandan & Zhong, Kaiyang & Aliyeva, Alina, 2023. "Machine learning assessment under the development of green technology innovation: A perspective of energy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 65-73.
    11. Pengjie Lu & Guanghua Qiao, 2024. "The Influence of Climate Perception and Low-Carbon Awareness on the Emission Reduction Willingness of Decision Makers in Large-Scale Dairy Farming: Evidence from the Midwest of Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Shi, Lei & Xu, Jia, 2023. "Capital accumulation and sustainable development in developing economies; role of natural resources development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    13. Fengwan Zhang & Wenfeng Zhou & Jia He & Chen Qing & Dingde Xu, 2023. "Effects of Land Transfer on Farmer Households’ Straw Resource Utilization in Rural Western China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Zhang, Dangli & Narbaev, Timur & Cheng, Jiexian & Aliyeva, Abuhayat, 2023. "How natural resources collaboration affects the pollutants level and economic growth: Novel evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    15. Huang, Feipeng, 2023. "How does trade and fiscal decentralization leads to green growth; role of renewable energy development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 334-341.
    16. Fang, Ying & Fan, Ying & Haroon, Muhammad & Dilanchiev, Azer, 2023. "Exploring the relationship between global economic policy and volatility of crude futures: A two-factor GARCH-MIDAS analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    17. Reza Movahedi & Mahboobeh Ataei-Asad & Taraneh Sarami-Foroushani, 2024. "Changing potato farmers’ behavior against only the chemical fertilizers to promote sustainable agricultural practice in Hamedan Province, Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24359-24380, September.
    18. Wang, Zheng & Feng, NaNa & Zuo, WenJin & Jia, YanHuai, 2024. "Sustainable recovery through efficient resource markets: Innovations and solutions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Bowen Wang & Desheng Hu & Diandian Hao & Meng Li & Yanan Wang, 2021. "Influence of Government Information on Farmers’ Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance: Mediating Effect Analysis Based on Moderation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Shuoyan He, 2024. "How does social capital affect farmers’ environment-friendly technology adoption behavior? A case study in Hubei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18361-18384, July.
    2. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    3. Zahra Fozouni Ardekani & Seyed Mohammad Javad Sobhani & Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & Ehsan Amiri-Ardekani & Samaneh Dehghani & Najmeh Sasani & Hans De Steur, 2024. "Determinants of household food waste behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: an integrated model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26205-26235, October.
    4. Mingyue Li & Jingjing Wang & Kai Chen & Lianbei Wu, 2020. "Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Farida Saleem & Ahmad Adeel & Rizwan Ali & Shabir Hyder, 2018. "Intentions to adopt ecopreneurship: moderating role of collectivism and altruism," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 517-537, December.
    6. Agus Sugiarto & Cheng-Wen Lee & Andrian Dolfriandra Huruta & Christine Dewi & Abbott Po Shun Chen, 2022. "Predictors of Pro-Environmental Intention and Behavior: A Perspective of Stimulus–Organism–Response Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Guizhi Qi & Borui Zhang & Biao Tian & Rui Yang & Andy Baker & Pan Wu & Shouyang He, 2023. "Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter from Agricultural and Livestock Effluents: Implications for Water Quality Monitoring," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Zhe Zhao & Pengyu Peng & Fan Zhang & Jiayin Wang & Hongxuan Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Urbanization Process on Agricultural Technical Efficiency in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Pouria Ataei & Hassan Sadighi & Mohammad Chizari & Enayat Abbasi, 2020. "In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7215-7237, December.
    10. Wafa Alwakid & Sebastian Aparicio & David Urbano, 2021. "The Influence of Green Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Formal Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Li Jiang & Yanru Zhang & Yi Zhu & Zhongliang Huang & Jing Huang & Zijian Wu & Xuan Zhang & Xiaoli Qin & Hui Li, 2023. "Effects of Magnetic Biochar Addition on Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Tamang, Phurba & Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Gunjyal, Neelam & Rahmani, Ali Mohammad & Singh, Rajesh & Kumar, Pradeep & Ahmed, Banafsha & Tyagi, Pooja & Banu, Rajesh & Varjani, Sunita & Kazmi, A.A., 2023. "Free nitrous acid (FNA) pretreatment enhances biomethanation of lignocellulosic agro-waste (wheat straw)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    13. John Chant & Keith Acheson, 1972. "The choice of monetary instruments and the theory of bureaucracy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 13-33, March.
    14. Nattakit Yuduang & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Poonyawat Kusonwattana & Waranya Limpasart & Thaninrat Sittiwatethanasiri & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Josephine D. , 2022. "Factors Influencing the Perceived Effectiveness of COVID-19 Risk Assessment Mobile Application “MorChana” in Thailand: UTAUT2 Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Aurelia DUMITRU & Andrei Bogdan BUDICÄ‚, 2017. "Informational Content Of The Periodic Synthesis Reports," Annals of the University of Craiova for Journalism, Communication and Management, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 3(1), pages 49-61, August.
    16. Yamini, Vaddula & Singh, Kulvir, 2024. "Emitter spacing, depth of lateral placement, and nutrient levels affect productivity of cotton-wheat cropping system under sub-surface drip fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    17. Zobeidi, Tahereh & Komendantova, Nadejda & Yazdanpanah, Masoud, 2022. "Social media as a driver of the use of renewable energy: The perceptions of instagram users in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Wei Xia, 2021. "How Do Network Embeddedness and Environmental Awareness Affect Farmers’ Participation in Improving Rural Human Settlements?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Simrin Kafle & Abhinav Vaidya & Bandana Pradhan & Erik Jørs & Sharad Onta, 2021. "Factors Associated with Practice of Chemical Pesticide Use and Acute Poisoning Experienced by Farmers in Chitwan District, Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Callen, Michael & Gulzar, Saad & Hasanain, Ali & Khan, Muhammad Yasir & Rezaee, Arman, 2023. "The political economy of public sector absence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3381-:d:357213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.