IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7421-d1465788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Climate Perception and Low-Carbon Awareness on the Emission Reduction Willingness of Decision Makers in Large-Scale Dairy Farming: Evidence from the Midwest of Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Pengjie Lu

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China)

  • Guanghua Qiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China)

Abstract

In recent years, global climate change has profoundly influenced natural ecosystems and human societies, making climate mitigation and carbon emission reduction a point of consensus among the international community. The issue of carbon emissions in agriculture, particularly in the livestock sector, is garnering increasing attention. This study focuses on large-scale dairy farms in the central and western regions of Inner Mongolia, exploring their low-carbon production behavioral intentions and influencing factors. By constructing a structural equation model (PLS-SEM), we systematically analyze the relationships between variables such as climate perception, value judgment, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived control and their combined effects on low-carbon production behavioral intentions. The findings suggest that the influence of climate perception and low-carbon awareness is mediated. Thus, the stronger the farm owners’ perception of climate change, the more they recognize the value of low-carbon production and the greater the social pressure they experience and their sense of self-efficacy. The farm owners’ attitudes, perceptions of social norms, and evaluations of their own capabilities collectively determine their intentions regarding low-carbon production. Furthermore, multi-group analysis showed significant heterogeneity in behavioral intentions between different scales of dairy farms. Small-scale farms, due to their weaker economic capacity, tend to harbor negative attitudes towards low-carbon production, while large-scale farms, with greater economic power and sensitivity to policy and market demands, are more likely to take low-carbon actions. This study provides theoretical support for formulating effective low-carbon policies, contributing to the sustainable development of the livestock sector and agriculture as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengjie Lu & Guanghua Qiao, 2024. "The Influence of Climate Perception and Low-Carbon Awareness on the Emission Reduction Willingness of Decision Makers in Large-Scale Dairy Farming: Evidence from the Midwest of Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7421-:d:1465788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7421/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7421/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dario Caro & Steven Davis & Simone Bastianoni & Ken Caldeira, 2014. "Global and regional trends in greenhouse gas emissions from livestock," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 203-216, September.
    2. Zexian Chen & Jingjing He, 2013. "Foreign Aid for Climate Change Related Capacity Building," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-046, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Chen, Zexian & He, Jingjing, 2013. "Foreign Aid for Climate Change Related Capacity Building," WIDER Working Paper Series 046, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Meredith T. Niles & Margaret Brown & Robyn Dynes, 2016. "Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 277-295, March.
    5. Liying Yu & Hongda Liu & Ardjouman Diabate & Yuyao Qian & Hagan Sibiri & Bing Yan, 2020. "Assessing Influence Mechanism of Green Utilization of Agricultural Wastes in Five Provinces of China through Farmers’ Motivation-Cognition-Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Meredith Niles & Margaret Brown & Robyn Dynes, 2016. "Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 277-295, March.
    7. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Hongxia & Lirong, Xing & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2021. "Understanding cognitive and socio-psychological factors determining farmers’ intentions to use improved grassland: Implications of land use policy for sustainable pasture production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Jim Ormond, 2020. "Geoengineering super low carbon cows: food and the corporate carbon economy in a low carbon world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 135-153, November.
    9. Andrew Barnes & Luiza Toma, 2012. "A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 507-522, May.
    10. Richard G. Taylor & Bridget Scanlon & Petra Döll & Matt Rodell & Rens van Beek & Yoshihide Wada & Laurent Longuevergne & Marc Leblanc & James S. Famiglietti & Mike Edmunds & Leonard Konikow & Timothy , 2013. "Ground water and climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 322-329, April.
    11. Edward Hanna & Francisco J. Navarro & Frank Pattyn & Catia M. Domingues & Xavier Fettweis & Erik R. Ivins & Robert J. Nicholls & Catherine Ritz & Ben Smith & Slawek Tulaczyk & Pippa L. Whitehouse & H., 2013. "Ice-sheet mass balance and climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 498(7452), pages 51-59, June.
    12. Fiala, Nathan, 2008. "Meeting the demand: An estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 412-419, October.
    13. Ting Yue & Qianru Wang & Ruyin Long & Hong Chen & Mengting Li & Haiwen Liu, 2022. "Impact of Urban Residents’ Environmental Cognition on Voluntary Carbon-Reduction Behavior: The Mediating Role of Environmental Emotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albert Moerkerken & Julia Blasch & Pieter Beukering & Erik Well, 2020. "A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 141-161, March.
    2. Sandra Ricart & Jorge Olcina & Antonio M. Rico, 2018. "Evaluating Public Attitudes and Farmers’ Beliefs towards Climate Change Adaptation: Awareness, Perception, and Populism at European Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Jaana Sorvali & Janne Kaseva & Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, 2021. "Farmer views on climate change—a longitudinal study of threats, opportunities and action," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. David Worden & Getu Hailu & Kate Jones & Yu Na Lee, 2022. "The effects of bundling on livestock producers' valuations of environmentally friendly traits available through genomic selection," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(4), pages 263-286, December.
    5. Kreft, Cordelia & Huber, Robert & Wuepper, David & Finger, Robert, 2021. "The role of non-cognitive skills in farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Wreford, Anita & Topp, Cairistiona F.E., 2020. "Impacts of climate change on livestock and possible adaptations: A case study of the United Kingdom," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Theodoros Skevas & Ray Massey & Jasper Grashuis, 2022. "Farmer adoption and intensity of use of extreme weather adaptation and mitigation strategies: evidence from a sample of Missouri farmers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Luis Ferney Moreno Castillo (Director editorial) & Carlos Villanueva (Coordinación), 2022. "Anuario iberoamericano de derecho de la energía. Volumen IV, Hacia un derecho global de la energía," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1345, October.
    9. Abebe, Fentahun & Zuo, Alec & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Bjornlund, Henning & Chilundo, Mario & Kissoly, Luitfred & Dube, Thabani, 2022. "The influences on farmers' planned and actual farm adaptation decisions: Evidence from small-scale irrigation schemes in South-Eastern Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. P. Marijn Poortvliet & Meredith T. Niles & Jeroen A. Veraart & Saskia E. Werners & Fiona C. Korporaal & Bob C. Mulder, 2020. "Communicating Climate Change Risk: A Content Analysis of IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Mihert Semere & Abirham Cherinet & Martha Gebreyesus, 2022. "Climate resilient traditional agroforestry systems in Silite district, Southern Ethiopia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(4), pages 136-144.
    12. Han, Guang & Niles, Meredith T., 2023. "An adoption spectrum for sustainable agriculture practices: A new framework applied to cover crop adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Tiberio Daddi & Niccolò Maria Todaro & Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Marco Frey, 2018. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 456-474, May.
    14. Devon Johnson & Maya Almaraz & Jessica Rudnick & Lauren E. Parker & Steven M. Ostoja & Sat Darshan S. Khalsa, 2023. "Farmer Adoption of Climate-Smart Practices Is Driven by Farm Characteristics, Information Sources, and Practice Benefits and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Guang Han & Meredith T. Niles, 2023. "Interested but Uncertain: Carbon Markets and Data Sharing among U.S. Crop Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Sandra Cortes Acosta & David Fleming & Loic Henry & Edmund Lou & Sally Owen & Bruce Small, 2019. "Identifying barriers to adoption of “no-cost” greenhouse gas mitigation practices in pastoral systems," Working Papers 19_10, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    17. Karen Richardsen Moberg & Benjamin K. Sovacool & Alexandra Goritz & Gaëtan M. Hinojosa & Carlo Aall & Maria Nilsson, 2021. "Barriers, emotions, and motivational levers for lifestyle transformation in Norwegian household decarbonization pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Muhammad Faisal & Azhar Abbas & Yi Cai & Abdelrahman Ali & Muhammad Amir Shahzad & Shoaib Akhtar & Muhammad Haseeb Raza & Muhammad Arslan Ajmal & Chunping Xia & Syed Abdul Sattar & Zahira Batool, 2021. "Perceptions, Vulnerability and Adaptation Strategies for Mitigating Climate Change Effects among Small Livestock Herders in Punjab, Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-21, October.
    19. William Adzawla & Hamdiyah Alhassan, 2021. "Effects of climate adaptation on technical efficiency of maize production in Northern Ghana," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Uttam Khanal & Clevo Wilson & Boon L. Lee & Viet-Ngu Hoang, 2018. "Climate change adaptation strategies and food productivity in Nepal: a counterfactual analysis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 575-590, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7421-:d:1465788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.