IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i20p4010-d278402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey G. Cox

    (Department of Communication Studies, Albion College, 611 East Porter Street, Albion, MI 49224, USA)

  • Minwoong Chung

    (Department of Communication, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA)

  • Joseph A. Hamm

    (School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 665 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA
    Environmental Science and Policy Program, Michigan State University, 293 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA)

  • Adam Zwickle

    (School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 665 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA
    Environmental Science and Policy Program, Michigan State University, 293 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA)

  • Shannon M. Cruz

    (Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • James W. Dearing

    (Department of Communication, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA)

Abstract

Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey G. Cox & Minwoong Chung & Joseph A. Hamm & Adam Zwickle & Shannon M. Cruz & James W. Dearing, 2019. "Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4010-:d:278402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer S. Carrera & Kent Key & Sarah Bailey & Joseph A. Hamm & Courtney A. Cuthbertson & E. Yvonne Lewis & Susan J. Woolford & E. Hill DeLoney & Ella Greene-Moton & Kaneesha Wallace & DeWaun E. Robi, 2019. "Community Science as a Pathway for Resilience in Response to a Public Health Crisis in Flint, Michigan," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Green, L.W. & Mercer, S.L., 2001. "Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(12), pages 1926-1929.
    3. Christopher, S. & Watts, V. & McCormick, A.K.H.G. & Young, S., 2008. "Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(8), pages 1398-1406.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shannon M. Cruz, 2019. "Themes Across New Directions in Community Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ooms, Tahnee & Klaser, Klaudijo & Ishkanian, Armine, 2023. "The role of academia practice partnerships in the well-being economy: Retracing synergies between health and social sciences using bibliometric analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. San Sebastián, Miguel & Hurtig, Anna Karin, 2005. "Oil development and health in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: the popular epidemiology process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 799-807, February.
    3. Heather Lochotzki & Karen Patricia Williams & Cynthia G. Colen & Olorunfemi Adetona & Charleta B. Tavares & Georgina M. Ginn & Rejeana Haynes & Wansoo Im & Tanya Bils & Darryl B. Hood, 2022. "A Framework for Interfacing and Partnering with Environmental Justice Communities as a Prelude to Human Health and Hazard Identification in the Vulnerable Census Tracts of Columbus, Ohio," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Kraemer Diaz, Anne E. & Spears Johnson, Chaya R. & Arcury, Thomas A., 2013. "Variation in the interpretation of scientific integrity in community-based participatory health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 134-142.
    5. Amy E. Lesen & Chloe Tucker & M. G. Olson & Regardt J. Ferreira, 2019. "‘Come Back at Us’: Reflections on Researcher-Community Partnerships during a Post-Oil Spill Gulf Coast Resilience Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Vicki Baard, 2010. "A critical review of interventionist research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 13-45, April.
    7. Kristine Wray & Akarath Soukhaphon & Brenda Parlee & Amabel D’Souza & Carolina Freitas & Iria Heredia & Chelsea Martin & Carrie Oloriz & Tracey Proverbs & Neal Spicer, 2020. "Aligning Intentions with Community: Graduate Students Reflect on Collaborative Methodologies with Indigenous Research Partners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Thurston, Wilfreda E. & MacKean, Gail & Vollman, Ardene & Casebeer, Ann & Weber, Myron & Maloff, Bretta & Bader, Judy, 2005. "Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 237-252, September.
    9. Emee Vida Estacio & Mike Oliver & Beth Downing & Judy Kurth & Joanne Protheroe, 2017. "Effective Partnership in Community-Based Health Promotion: Lessons from the Health Literacy Partnership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Guta, Adrian & Strike, Carol & Flicker, Sarah & J. Murray, Stuart & Upshur, Ross & Myers, Ted, 2014. "Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 250-261.
    11. Leanne Fawkes & Garett Sansom, 2021. "Preliminary Study of Lead-Contaminated Drinking Water in Public Parks—An Assessment of Equity and Exposure Risks in Two Texas Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-8, June.
    12. Joe F. Bozeman & Shauhrat S. Chopra & Philip James & Sajjad Muhammad & Hua Cai & Kangkang Tong & Maya Carrasquillo & Harold Rickenbacker & Destenie Nock & Weslynne Ashton & Oliver Heidrich & Sybil Der, 2023. "Three research priorities for just and sustainable urban systems: Now is the time to refocus," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 382-394, April.
    13. Arif Jameel & Muhammad Asif & Abid Hussain & Jinsoo Hwang & Noman Sahito & Mussawar Hussain Bukhari, 2019. "Assessing the Moderating Effect of Corruption on the E-Government and Trust Relationship: An Evidence of an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Roels, Nastasja Ilonka & Estrella, Amarilys & Maldonado-Salcedo, Melissa & Rapp, Rayna & Hansen, Helena & Hardon, Anita, 2022. "Confident futures: Community-based organizations as first responders and agents of change in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    15. Allison Williams & Bill Holden & Peter Krebs & Nazeem Muhajarine & Kate Waygood & James Randall & Cara Spence, 2008. "Knowledge translation strategies in a community–university partnership: examining local Quality of Life (QoL)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 111-125, January.
    16. Rebecca L. Vidra & Deborah R. Gallagher & Victoria Wilson, 2019. "Acknowledging the challenges of pedagogical innovation: the case of integrating research, teaching, and the practice of environmental leadership," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(3), pages 270-275, September.
    17. Wagemakers, Annemarie & Vaandrager, Lenneke & Koelen, Maria A. & Saan, Hans & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 428-435, November.
    18. Dave, Gaurav & Frerichs, Leah & Jones, Jennifer & Kim, Mimi & Schaal, Jennifer & Vassar, Stefanie & Varma, Deepthi & Striley, Catherine & Ruktanonchai, Corrine & Black, Adina & Hankins, Jennifer & Lov, 2018. "Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 70-78.
    19. Patricia Harrison & Helen Collins & Alexandra Bahor, 2022. "‘We Don’t Have the Same Opportunities as Others’: Shining Bourdieu’s Lens on UK Roma Migrants’ Precarious (Workers’) Habitus," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 217-234, April.
    20. Phyllis Dako-Gyeke & Adolphina Addoley Addo-Lartey & Deda Ogum Alangea & Yandisa Sikweyiya & Esnat Dorothy Chirwa & Dorcas Coker-Appiah & Rachel Jewkes & Richard Mawuena Kofi Adanu, 2019. "'Small small quarrels bring about happiness or love in the relationships’: Exploring community perceptions and gendered norms contributing to male perpetrated intimate partner violence in the Central ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4010-:d:278402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.