IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/200191121926-1929_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?

Author

Listed:
  • Green, L.W.
  • Mercer, S.L.

Abstract

Responding to growing impatience with the limited application of research findings to health practices and policies, both funding bodies and communities are demanding that research show greater sensitivity to communities' perceptions, needs, and unique circumstances. One way to assure this is to employ participatory research-to engage communities at least in formulating research questions and interpreting and applying research findings and possibly also in selecting methods and analyzing data. "Community" should be interpreted broadly as all who will be affected by the research results, including lay residents of a local area, practitioners, service agencies, and policymakers. Participatory research should not be required of every project, but when results are to be used for, in, and by communities, those communities should collaborate not only in applying findings but also in determining the ways in which the findings are produced and interpreted.

Suggested Citation

  • Green, L.W. & Mercer, S.L., 2001. "Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(12), pages 1926-1929.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:12:1926-1929_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wagemakers, Annemarie & Vaandrager, Lenneke & Koelen, Maria A. & Saan, Hans & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 428-435, November.
    2. Abby N. Hagemeyer & Clara G. Sears & Kristina M. Zierold, 2019. "Respiratory Health in Adults Residing Near a Coal-Burning Power Plant with Coal Ash Storage Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Jeffrey G. Cox & Minwoong Chung & Joseph A. Hamm & Adam Zwickle & Shannon M. Cruz & James W. Dearing, 2019. "Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Guta, Adrian & Strike, Carol & Flicker, Sarah & J. Murray, Stuart & Upshur, Ross & Myers, Ted, 2014. "Governing through community-based research: Lessons from the Canadian HIV research sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 250-261.
    5. Young, Tiffany L. & Janke, Megan C. & Sharpe, Chantel & Carthron, Dana, 2019. "Evaluating the feasibility of a community intergenerational physical activity intervention for kinship families: Professional stakeholders’ perspectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 136-144.
    6. San Sebastián, Miguel & Hurtig, Anna Karin, 2005. "Oil development and health in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: the popular epidemiology process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 799-807, February.
    7. Kristine Wray & Akarath Soukhaphon & Brenda Parlee & Amabel D’Souza & Carolina Freitas & Iria Heredia & Chelsea Martin & Carrie Oloriz & Tracey Proverbs & Neal Spicer, 2020. "Aligning Intentions with Community: Graduate Students Reflect on Collaborative Methodologies with Indigenous Research Partners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Phyllis Dako-Gyeke & Adolphina Addoley Addo-Lartey & Deda Ogum Alangea & Yandisa Sikweyiya & Esnat Dorothy Chirwa & Dorcas Coker-Appiah & Rachel Jewkes & Richard Mawuena Kofi Adanu, 2019. "'Small small quarrels bring about happiness or love in the relationships’: Exploring community perceptions and gendered norms contributing to male perpetrated intimate partner violence in the Central ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Allison Williams & Bill Holden & Peter Krebs & Nazeem Muhajarine & Kate Waygood & James Randall & Cara Spence, 2008. "Knowledge translation strategies in a community–university partnership: examining local Quality of Life (QoL)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 111-125, January.
    10. Thurston, Wilfreda E. & MacKean, Gail & Vollman, Ardene & Casebeer, Ann & Weber, Myron & Maloff, Bretta & Bader, Judy, 2005. "Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 237-252, September.
    11. Kraemer Diaz, Anne E. & Spears Johnson, Chaya R. & Arcury, Thomas A., 2013. "Variation in the interpretation of scientific integrity in community-based participatory health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 134-142.
    12. Samantha Wells & Andrea Flynn & Kathryn Graham & Jürgen Rehm & John Cairney & Nick Kates & James L. Kennedy & Daniela S.S. Lobo & Michael Chaiton & Peter Menzies & Rachel F. Tyndale & Zulfikarali Verj, 2011. "Using a Mobile Laboratory to Study Mental Health, Addictions and Violence: A Research Plan," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2001:91:12:1926-1929_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.