IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i20p3891-d276268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Factors of PM 2.5 Pollution: Disaster Points of Meteorological Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiling Sun

    (School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Nanjing Research Institute of Ecological and Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210013, China)

  • Yi Zhou

    (School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Jie Wu

    (Jiangsu Institute of Quality & Standardization, Nanjing 210029, China)

  • Zaiwu Gong

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

A chance constrained stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was developed for investigating the relations between PM 2.5 pollution days and meteorological factors and human activities, incorporating with an empirical study for 13 cities in Jiangsu Province (China) to illustrate the model. This approach not only admits random input and output environment, but also allows the evaluation unit to exceed the front edge under the given probability constraint. Moreover, observing the change in outcome variables when a group of explanatory variables are deleted provides an additional strategic technique to measure the effect of the remaining explanatory variables. It is found that: (1) For 2013–2016, the influencing factors of PM 2.5 pollution days included wind speed, no precipitation day, relative humidity, population density, construction area, transportation, coal consumption and green coverage rate. In 2016, the number of cities whose PM 2.5 pollution days was affected by construction was decreased by three from 2015 but increased according to transportation and energy utilization. (2) The PM 2.5 pollution days in southern and central Jiangsu Province were primarily affected by the combined effect of the meteorological factors and social progress, while the northern Jiangsu Province was largely impacted by the social progress. In 2013–2016, at different risk levels, 60% inland cities were of valid stochastic efficiency, while 33% coastal cities were of valid stochastic efficiency. (3) The chance constrained stochastic DEA, which incorporates the data distribution characteristics of meteorological factors and human activities, is valuable for exploring the essential features of data in investigating the influencing factors of PM 2.5 .

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiling Sun & Yi Zhou & Jie Wu & Zaiwu Gong, 2019. "Influencing Factors of PM 2.5 Pollution: Disaster Points of Meteorological Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-31, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:3891-:d:276268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuewei Hou & Dongdong Fei & Hanqing Kang & Yinglong Zhang & Jinhui Gao, 2018. "Seasonal statistical analysis of the impact of meteorological factors on fine particle pollution in China in 2013–2017," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(2), pages 677-698, September.
    2. Brett J. Tunno & Sheila Tripathy & Ellen Kinnee & Drew R. Michanowicz & Jessie LC Shmool & Leah Cambal & Lauren Chubb & Courtney Roper & Jane E. Clougherty, 2018. "Fine-Scale Source Apportionment Including Diesel-Related Elemental and Organic Constituents of PM 2.5 across Downtown Pittsburgh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Bruni, M.E. & Conforti, D. & Beraldi, P. & Tundis, E., 2009. "Probabilistically constrained models for efficiency and dominance in DEA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 219-228, January.
    4. Xiaopeng Guo & Jiaxing Shi & Dongfang Ren & Jing Ren & Qilin Liu, 2017. "Correlations between air pollutant emission, logistic services, GDP, and urban population growth from vector autoregressive modeling: a case study of Beijing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 885-897, June.
    5. Li Tian & Wei Hou & Jiquan Chen & Chaonan Chen & Xiaojun Pan, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Changes in PM 2.5 and Their Relationships with Land-Use and People in Hangzhou," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Zhang, Chen & Ni, Zhiwei & Ni, Liping, 2015. "Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis between PM2.5 and meteorological factors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 114-123.
    7. Yi Yang & Jie Li & Guobin Zhu & Qiangqiang Yuan, 2019. "Spatio–Temporal Relationship and Evolvement of Socioeconomic Factors and PM 2.5 in China During 1998–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Yang Li & Jun Tao & Leiming Zhang & Xiaofang Jia & Yunfei Wu, 2016. "High Contributions of Secondary Inorganic Aerosols to PM 2.5 under Polluted Levels at a Regional Station in Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
    9. W W Cooper & H Deng & Z Huang & S X Li, 2002. "Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(12), pages 1347-1356, December.
    10. Ashok Jaswal & Naresh Kumar & Anup Prasad & Menas Kafatos, 2013. "Decline in horizontal surface visibility over India (1961–2008) and its association with meteorological variables," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 929-954, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dasgupta,Susmita & Khaliquzzaman,M. & Wheeler,David R., 2020. "Global Technology for Local Monitoring of Air Pollution in Dhaka," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9429, The World Bank.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khodadadipour, M. & Hadi-Vencheh, A. & Behzadi, M.H. & Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., 2021. "Undesirable factors in stochastic DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: An application to thermal power plant energy efficiency," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 613-628.
    2. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Adel Hatami-Marbini & Ali Emrouznejad & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2020. "Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1863-1898, September.
    3. Chen, Kun & Zhu, Joe, 2019. "Computational tractability of chance constrained data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 1037-1046.
    4. Vincent Charles & Ioannis E. Tsolas & Tatiana Gherman, 2018. "Satisficing data envelopment analysis: a Bayesian approach for peer mining in the banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 81-102, October.
    5. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2019. "Stochastic efficiency measures for production units with correlated data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 278-287.
    6. Li, Xingchen & Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Xu, Chengzhen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Wu, Desheng (Dash) & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2010. "Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1679-1688, December.
    8. Manimaran, P. & Narayana, A.C., 2018. "Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis on air pollutants of University of Hyderabad Campus, India," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 228-235.
    9. Prakashan Veettil & Stijn Speelman & Guido Huylenbroeck, 2013. "Estimating the Impact of Water Pricing on Water Use Efficiency in Semi-arid Cropping System: An Application of Probabilistically Constrained Nonparametric Efficiency Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(1), pages 55-73, January.
    10. Zhiping Zhang & Fuqiang Xia & Degang Yang & Yufang Zhang & Tianyi Cai & Rongwei Wu, 2019. "Comparative Study of Environmental Assessment Methods in the Evaluation of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity—A Case Study in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    12. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    13. John Ruggiero, 2004. "Data envelopment analysis with stochastic data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 1008-1012, September.
    14. Yong Zeng & Yanpeng Cai & Guohe Huang & Jing Dai, 2011. "A Review on Optimization Modeling of Energy Systems Planning and GHG Emission Mitigation under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-33, October.
    15. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Characterizing the Influences of Economic Development, Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Industrialization, and Vehicles Amount on PM 2.5 Concentrations of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Angus Jeang, 2019. "Robust DEA methodology via computer model for conceptual design under uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1221-1245, March.
    17. Wanke, Peter & Barros, C.P. & Figueiredo, Otávio, 2016. "Efficiency and productive slacks in urban transportation modes: A two-stage SDEA-Beta Regression approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 31-39.
    18. Wai‐Peng Wong & Qiang Deng & Ming-Lang Tseng & Loo‐Hay Lee & Chee‐Wooi Hooy, 2014. "A Stochastic Setting To Bank Financial Performance For Refining Efficiency Estimates," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 225-245, October.
    19. Lin, Sheng-Wei & Lu, Wen-Min, 2024. "A comparison of chance-constrained data envelopment analysis, stochastic nonparametric envelopment of data and bootstrap method: A case study of cultural regeneration performance of cities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1179-1191.
    20. Felix Bracht & Dennis Verhoeven, 2021. "Air pollution and innovation," CEP Discussion Papers dp1817, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:3891-:d:276268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.