IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i8p1633-d161467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Office Environmental Stressors to Work Performance: The Role of Work Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Aida Soriano

    (Departamento de Psicología Social, IDOCAL, Universitat de València, Valencia 46010, Spain)

  • Malgorzata W. Kozusznik

    (Research Group for Work, Organizational and Personnel Psychology (WOPP), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Jose M. Peiró

    (Departamento de Psicología Social, IDOCAL, Universitat de València, Valencia 46010, Spain
    Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia 46020, Spain)

Abstract

Background : Different studies have shown a relationship between office environmental stressors and performance. However, studying environmental stress in the workplace requires analyzing more specific patterns to generate knowledge about the type of employees who are more or less vulnerable to environmental stressors. The present study analyzes the mediating role of health symptoms and negative emotions in the relationship between stressors and performance in different work patterns (task complexity and interactivity). Methods : There were 83 office workers (n = 603 time points) that took part in a diary study with multilevel design. Results : The appraisal of the environmental stressors is positively related to health-related symptoms, which in turn increase negative emotions, and then decrease the performance of workers who perform complex tasks and interact frequently with other people at work. This mediation is not significant when office workers do not interact frequently with other people at work and/or perform simple, rather than complex tasks. Conclusions : Work patterns play an important role when studying the mediating role of health-related symptoms and negative emotions in the relationship between the appraisal of environmental stressors and performance in office workers. In other words, employees in the ‘interactive and complex’ pattern are more vulnerable to the negative effects of office stressors on performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Aida Soriano & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Jose M. Peiró, 2018. "From Office Environmental Stressors to Work Performance: The Role of Work Patterns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1633-:d:161467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seo, Myeong-gu & Ilies, Remus, 2009. "The role of self-efficacy, goal, and affect in dynamic motivational self-regulation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 120-133, July.
    2. Ivan Robertson & Cary Cooper, 2011. "Work and Well-Being," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Well-Being, chapter 0, pages 78-92, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Verena Wagner-Hartl & Nina R. Grossi & K. Wolfgang Kallus, 2018. "Impact of Age and Hearing Impairment on Work Performance during Long Working Hours," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Erik Angner & Jennifer Ghandhi & Kristen Williams Purvis & Daniel Amante & Jeroan Allison, 2013. "Daily Functioning, Health Status, and Happiness in Older Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1563-1574, October.
    5. Klitzman, Susan & Stellman, Jeanne M., 1989. "The impact of the physical environment on the psychological well-being of office workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 733-742, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Andrade & Johann Land & Patricio Gallardo & Susan Krumdieck, 2022. "Application of the InTIME Methodology for the Transition of Office Buildings to Low Carbon—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Yoko E. Fukumura & Julie McLaughlin Gray & Gale M. Lucas & Burcin Becerik-Gerber & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Worker Perspectives on Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Office Workspaces: Implications for the Future of Office Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata W Kożusznik & José M Peiró & Aida Soriano, 2019. "Daily eudaimonic well-being as a predictor of daily performance: A dynamic lens," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Whiting, Anita & Donthu, Naveen & Baker, Andrew M., 2011. "Investigating the immediate and long-term effects of job stressors on frontline service employees," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 319-331.
    3. Robert Weech-Maldonado & Michael J. Miller & Justin C. Lord, 2017. "The Relationships among Socio-Demographics, Perceived Health, and Happiness," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 289-302, June.
    4. Beck, James W. & Schmidt, Aaron M., 2012. "Taken out of context? Cross-level effects of between-person self-efficacy and difficulty on the within-person relationship of self-efficacy with resource allocation and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 195-208.
    5. Neha Gopinath & Jay Mitra, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and Well-being: Towards Developing a Novel Conceptual Framework for Entrepreneurial Sustainability in Organisations," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 3(1), pages 62-70, January.
    6. Anna Olga Kuzminska, 2016. "Third Variable Effects in Management Studies (Efekty trzeciej zmiennej w naukach o zarzadzaniu)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(60), pages 147-159.
    7. Łukasz Baka & Dawid Ścigała & Łukasz Kapica & Andrzej Najmiec & Krzysztof Grala, 2021. "How Is Work Ability Shaped in Groups of Shift and Non-Shift Workers? A Comprehensive Approach to Job Resources and Mediation Role of Emotions at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Furkan Tosyali & Ezgi Coban-Tosyali & Mehmet Harma, 2024. "Predictors of Subjective Health Among Spouses and Its Relations With Happiness: A Multilevel Analysis in a Nationwide Survey in Turkey," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Blair, Sean, 2020. "How lacking control drives fluency effects in evaluative judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 97-112.
    10. Mohd Fadhli Mohd Fauzi & Hanizah Mohd Yusoff & Nur Adibah Mat Saruan & Rosnawati Muhamad Robat, 2020. "Development and validation of Work-Related Activities during Non-Work Time Scale (WANTS) for doctors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Asya Bellia & Lorenzo Corsini, 2024. "Disability and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Accessibility," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1-37, December.
    12. José M. Peiró & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Isabel Rodríguez-Molina & Núria Tordera, 2019. "The Happy-Productive Worker Model and Beyond: Patterns of Wellbeing and Performance at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Allan, Julia L. & Andelic, Nicole & Bender, Keith A. & Powell, Daniel & Stoffel, Sandro & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2021. "Employment contracts and stress: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 360-373.
    14. Christian Gunadi & Hanbyul Ryu, 2021. "Does the rise of robotic technology make people healthier?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2047-2062, September.
    15. Anouk Decuypere & Wilmar Schaufeli, 2021. "Exploring the Leadership–Engagement Nexus: A Moderated Meta-Analysis and Review of Explaining Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-34, August.
    16. H. Nicolás Acosta-González & Oscar D. Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, 2021. "The Relationship Between Subjective Well-Being and Self-Reported Health: Evidence from Ecuador," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(5), pages 1961-1981, October.
    17. Germán Lobos & Klaus G. Grunert & Miguel Bustamante & Berta Schnettler, 2016. "With Health and Good Food, Great Life! Gender Differences and Happiness in Chilean Rural Older Adults," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 865-885, June.
    18. Qian Jin & Philip Pearce & Hui Hu, 2018. "The Study on the Satisfaction of the Elderly People Living with Their Children," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 1159-1172, December.
    19. Jo Ritzen & Klaus Zimmermann, 2014. "A vibrant European labor market with full employment," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia & Emma Bodoasca & Giulia Cantonetti & Donato Ferri & Laura Borgogni, 2023. "Linking Irrational Beliefs with Well-Being at Work: The Role of Fulfilling Performance Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1633-:d:161467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.