IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v156y2020icp97-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How lacking control drives fluency effects in evaluative judgment

Author

Listed:
  • Blair, Sean

Abstract

Everyday life is replete with situations that can undermine the perception of personal control. In the current research, the author demonstrates that these experiences can have a pronounced impact on judgment and decision making by increasing evaluative preferences for fluent stimuli. The author argues this occurs because fluent stimuli promote a sense of structure that helps compensate for low control. Consistent with a compensatory process, the data further show that this effect is attenuated when alternative compensatory control strategies are readily available. Six studies document this effect and its implications for how individuals evaluate an organization’s offerings, brand name, tagline, and stock—including two studies examining fluency effects in stock market valuations. Taken together, these findings provide convergent evidence in support of the author's theorizing that fluent stimuli represent a novel means by which individuals attempt to compensate for low control.

Suggested Citation

  • Blair, Sean, 2020. "How lacking control drives fluency effects in evaluative judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 97-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:156:y:2020:i:c:p:97-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597818309774
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seo, Myeong-gu & Ilies, Remus, 2009. "The role of self-efficacy, goal, and affect in dynamic motivational self-regulation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 120-133, July.
    2. Durham, Greg & Santhanakrishnan, Mukunthan, 2016. "Ticker fluency, sentiment, and asset valuation," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 89-96.
    3. Kim, Yeun Joon & Zhong, Chen-Bo, 2017. "Ideas rise from chaos: Information structure and creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 15-27.
    4. Fitzsimons, Gavan J, 2000. "Consumer Response to Stockouts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 249-266, September.
    5. Boyoun (Grace) Chae & Rui (Juliet) Zhu, 2014. "Environmental Disorder Leads to Self-Regulatory Failure," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1203-1218.
    6. Anne-Sophie Chaxel, 2016. "Why, When, and How Personal Control Impacts Information Processing: A Framework," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(1), pages 179-197.
    7. Katharine H Greenaway & Winnifred R Louis & Matthew J Hornsey, 2013. "Loss of Control Increases Belief in Precognition and Belief in Precognition Increases Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-6, August.
    8. Ma, Anyi & Kay, Aaron C., 2017. "Compensatory control and ambiguity intolerance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 46-61.
    9. Keisha M. Cutright, 2012. "The Beauty of Boundaries: When and Why We Seek Structure in Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(5), pages 775-790.
    10. Greenberger, David B. & Strasser, Stephen & Cummings, Larry L. & Dunham, Randall B., 1989. "The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 29-51, February.
    11. Brigitte C. Madrian & Dennis F. Shea, 2001. "The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(4), pages 1149-1187.
    12. Morris, Michael W. & Sheldon, Oliver J. & Ames, Daniel R. & Young, Maia J, 2007. "Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 174-192, March.
    13. Green, T. Clifton & Jame, Russell, 2013. "Company name fluency, investor recognition, and firm value," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 813-834.
    14. Chernev, Alexander, 2003. "When More Is Less and Less Is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 170-183, September.
    15. Derick F. Davis & Paul M. Herr, 2014. "From Bye to Buy: Homophones as a Phonological Route to Priming," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1063-1077.
    16. Davis, Derick F. & Bagchi, Rajesh & Block, Lauren G., 2016. "Alliteration Alters: Phonetic Overlap in Promotional Messages Influences Evaluations and Choice," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-12.
    17. Head, Alex & Smith, Gary & Wilson, Julia, 2009. "Would a stock by any other ticker smell as sweet?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 551-561, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junfeng Liu & Shen-Long Yang & Feng Yu, 2022. "Who Tends to Appreciate Atonal Music? Higher Perceived Personal Control Leads to an Increased Inclination to Prefer Atonal Music," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Leonhardt, James M. & Pechmann, Cornelia, 2021. "Is this product easy to control? Liabilities of using difficult-to-pronounce product names," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 90-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, Feilian & Thewissen, James & Shrestha, Prabal & Yan, Shuo, 2024. "The power of a name: Exploring the relationship between ICO name fluency and investor decision making," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Ting-Ting Rao & Shen-Long Yang & Xiaowen Zhu, 2022. "How Does Social Class Affect Need for Structure during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Moderated Mediating Model Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Durham, Greg & Santhanakrishnan, Mukunthan, 2016. "Ticker fluency, sentiment, and asset valuation," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 89-96.
    4. Montone, Maurizio & van den Assem, Martijn J. & Zwinkels, Remco C.J., 2023. "Company name fluency and stock returns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Liu, Pengcheng & Xie, Qing & You, Yi & Dong, Qingqing, 2024. "A Study of Choice Overload Measurement in Food Consumption," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344272, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    6. Baer, Naomi & Barry, Erica & Smith, Gary, 2020. "The name game: The importance of resourcefulness, ruses, and recall in stock ticker symbols," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 410-413.
    7. Xiong, Xiling & Wong, IpKin Anthony & Yang, Fiona X., 2021. "Are we behaviorally immune to COVID-19 through robots?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Gong, Siyu & Suo, Danni & Peverelli, Peter, 2023. "Maintaining the order: How social crowding promotes minimalistic consumption practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Yan, Huan & Chang, En-Chung & Chou, Ting-Jui & Tang, Xiaofei, 2015. "The over-categorization effect: How the number of categorizations influences shoppers' perceptions of variety and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 631-638.
    10. José M. Peiró & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Isabel Rodríguez-Molina & Núria Tordera, 2019. "The Happy-Productive Worker Model and Beyond: Patterns of Wellbeing and Performance at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Trampe, Debra & Konuş, Umut & Verhoef, Peter C., 2014. "Customer Responses to Channel Migration Strategies Toward the E-channel," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 257-270.
    12. Chang, En-Chung & Xie, Chunya & Fan, Xiaomeng, 2022. "Defending the rules: How exposure to immoral behavior influences the boundary preference," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 654-663.
    13. Xing, Xuejing & Anderson, Randy I. & Hu, Yan, 2016. "What׳s a name worth? The impact of a likeable stock ticker symbol on firm value," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 63-80.
    14. Jungki Lee, 2012. "Components Of Medical Service Users’ Dissatisfaction: A Perceived Control Perspective," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 53-63..
    15. Lauren S. Carroll & Mathew P. White & Sabine Pahl, 2011. "The impact of excess choice on deferment of decisions to volunteer," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(7), pages 629-637, October.
    16. Kanfer, Ruth & Chen, Gilad, 2016. "Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 6-19.
    17. Junfeng Liu & Shen-Long Yang & Feng Yu, 2022. "Who Tends to Appreciate Atonal Music? Higher Perceived Personal Control Leads to an Increased Inclination to Prefer Atonal Music," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-10, March.
    18. Kowalczyk, Liliana & Breugelmans, Els & Campo, Katia, 2021. "It's not there, I love it! How relevance to objective needs of an unavailable item impacts emotions, store image, and behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Hu, Cui & Li, Ben G., 2021. "Chinese lexicography and stock trading," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 44-59.
    20. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:629-637 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Simona Botti & Susan Broniarczyk & Gerald Häubl & Ron Hill & Yanliu Huang & Barbara Kahn & Praveen Kopalle & Donald Lehmann & Joe Urbany & Brian Wansink, 2008. "Choice under restrictions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 183-199, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:156:y:2020:i:c:p:97-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.