IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i5p462-d96854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Land Use on PM 2.5 Pollution in a Representative City of Middle China

Author

Listed:
  • Haiou Yang

    (College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
    Key Laboratory of Landscape and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
    College of Tourism and Territorial Resources, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China)

  • Wenbo Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Landscape and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

  • Zhaofeng Liang

    (Key Laboratory of Landscape and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) pollution has become one of the greatest urban issues in China. Studies have shown that PM 2.5 pollution is strongly related to the land use pattern at the micro-scale and optimizing the land use pattern has been suggested as an approach to mitigate PM 2.5 pollution. However, there are only a few researches analyzing the effect of land use on PM 2.5 pollution. This paper employed land use regression (LUR) models and statistical analysis to explore the effect of land use on PM 2.5 pollution in urban areas. Nanchang city, China, was taken as the study area. The LUR models were used to simulate the spatial variations of PM 2.5 concentrations. Analysis of variance and multiple comparisons were employed to study the PM 2.5 concentration variances among five different types of urban functional zones. Multiple linear regression was applied to explore the PM 2.5 concentration variances among the same type of urban functional zone. The results indicate that the dominant factor affecting PM 2.5 pollution in the Nanchang urban area was the traffic conditions. Significant variances of PM 2.5 concentrations among different urban functional zones throughout the year suggest that land use types generated a significant impact on PM 2.5 concentrations and the impact did not change as the seasons changed. Land use intensity indexes including the building volume rate, building density, and green coverage rate presented an insignificant or counter-intuitive impact on PM 2.5 concentrations when studied at the spatial scale of urban functional zones. Our study demonstrates that land use can greatly affect the PM 2.5 levels. Additionally, the urban functional zone was an appropriate spatial scale to investigate the impact of land use type on PM 2.5 pollution in urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiou Yang & Wenbo Chen & Zhaofeng Liang, 2017. "Impact of Land Use on PM 2.5 Pollution in a Representative City of Middle China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:5:p:462-:d:96854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/5/462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/5/462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neal Fann & Amy D. Lamson & Susan C. Anenberg & Karen Wesson & David Risley & Bryan J. Hubbell, 2012. "Estimating the National Public Health Burden Associated with Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 81-95, January.
    2. Tao Chen & Jun He & Xiaowei Lu & Jiangfeng She & Zhongqing Guan, 2016. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of PM 2.5 and Its Relation to Meteorological Factors in the Urban Area of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Gang Lin & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang & Wensheng Hu & Donglin Dong & Yaohuan Huang & Mingdong Zhao, 2013. "Spatio-Temporal Variation of PM 2.5 Concentrations and Their Relationship with Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Tianhao Zhang & Wei Gong & Wei Wang & Yuxi Ji & Zhongmin Zhu & Yusi Huang, 2016. "Ground Level PM 2.5 Estimates over China Using Satellite-Based Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) Models Are Improved by Including NO 2 and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Wang & Lin Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Technology Innovation on Urban Land Intensive Use in China: Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Widya Liadira Kusuma & Wu Chih-Da & Zeng Yu-Ting & Handayani Hepi Hapsari & Jaelani Lalu Muhamad, 2019. "PM 2.5 Pollutant in Asia—A Comparison of Metropolis Cities in Indonesia and Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Jing Zhang & Wenjian Zhu & Dubin Dong & Yuan Ren & Wenhao Hu & Xinjie Jin & Zhengxuan He & Jian Chen & Xiaoai Jin & Tianhuan Zhou, 2024. "The Influence of Three-Dimensional Building Morphology on PM 2.5 Concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Chengming Li & Kuo Zhang & Zhaoxin Dai & Zhaoting Ma & Xiaoli Liu, 2020. "Investigation of the Impact of Land-Use Distribution on PM 2.5 in Weifang: Seasonal Variations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Wenbo Chen & Fuqing Zhang & Saiwei Luo & Taojie Lu & Jiao Zheng & Lei He, 2022. "Three-Dimensional Landscape Pattern Characteristics of Land Function Zones and Their Influence on PM 2.5 Based on LUR Model in the Central Urban Area of Nanchang City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Lili Guo & Yuting Song & Mengqian Tang & Jinyang Tang & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Mengying Su & Houjian Li, 2022. "Assessing the Relationship among Land Transfer, Fertilizer Usage, and PM 2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Binghui Yang & Ye Chen, 2021. "PM2.5 Pollutant Concentrations in Greenspaces of Nanjing Are High but Can Be Lowered with Environmental Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Bumseok Chun & Kwangyul Choi & Qisheng Pan, 2022. "Key determinants of particulate matter 2.5 concentrations in urban environments with scenario analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1980-1994, September.
    9. Sonja Dmitrašinović & Jelena Radonić & Marija Živković & Željko Ćirović & Milena Jovašević-Stojanović & Miloš Davidović, 2024. "Winter and Summer PM 2.5 Land Use Regression Models for the City of Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Ruiyuan Jiang & Changkun Xie & Zihao Man & Rebecca Zhou & Shengquan Che, 2023. "Effects of Urban Green and Blue Space on the Diffusion Range of PM 2.5 and PM 10 Based on LCZ," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Shibo Bi & Ming Chen & Zheng Tian & Peiyi Jiang & Fei Dai & Guowei Wang, 2024. "Optimizing Urban Green Spaces for Air Quality Improvement: A Multiscale Land Use/Land Cover Synergy Practical Framework in Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huilin Yang & Rui Yao & Peng Sun & Chenhao Ge & Zice Ma & Yaojin Bian & Ruilin Liu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of PM 2.5 in Urban Agglomerations in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Junming Li & Meijun Jin & Honglin Li, 2019. "Exploring Spatial Influence of Remotely Sensed PM 2.5 Concentration Using a Developed Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Ling Yao & Ning Lu, 2014. "Particulate Matter Pollution and Population Exposure Assessment over Mainland China in 2010 with Remote Sensing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Wei Xue & Qingming Zhan & Qi Zhang & Zhonghua Wu, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Variations of Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants and Their Relations to Meteorological Parameters: The Case of Xiangyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Shih Ying Chang & William Vizuete & Marc Serre & Lakshmi Pradeepa Vennam & Mohammad Omary & Vlad Isakov & Michael Breen & Saravanan Arunachalam, 2017. "Finely Resolved On‐Road PM2.5 and Estimated Premature Mortality in Central North Carolina," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2420-2434, December.
    6. Wenting Wang & Lijun Zhang & Jun Zhao & Mengge Qi & Fengrui Chen, 2020. "The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Spatiotemporal Patterns of PM 2.5 Concentration in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region and Surrounding Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Lisha Luo & Junfeng Jiang & Ganshen Zhang & Lu Wang & Zhenkun Wang & Jin Yang & Chuanhua Yu, 2017. "Stroke Mortality Attributable to Ambient Particulate Matter Pollution from 1990 to 2015 in China: An Age-Period-Cohort and Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Huanfeng Shen & Man Zhou & Tongwen Li & Chao Zeng, 2019. "Integration of Remote Sensing and Social Sensing Data in a Deep Learning Framework for Hourly Urban PM 2.5 Mapping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Wenbo Chen & Fuqing Zhang & Saiwei Luo & Taojie Lu & Jiao Zheng & Lei He, 2022. "Three-Dimensional Landscape Pattern Characteristics of Land Function Zones and Their Influence on PM 2.5 Based on LUR Model in the Central Urban Area of Nanchang City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Mao Mao & Xiaolin Zhang & Yan Yin, 2018. "Particulate Matter and Gaseous Pollutions in Three Metropolises along the Chinese Yangtze River: Situation and Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, May.
    11. Lin Jia & Xiaoyi Zhou & Qingjie Wang, 2023. "Effects of Agricultural Machinery Operations on PM 2.5 , PM 10 and TSP in Farmland under Different Tillage Patterns," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Anne E. Smith & Will Gans, 2015. "Enhancing the Characterization of Epistemic Uncertainties in PM2.5 Risk Analyses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 361-378, March.
    13. Jin-Wei Yan & Fei Tao & Shuai-Qian Zhang & Shuang Lin & Tong Zhou, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Driving Forces of PM2.5 in Three Urban Agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Klingen, Joris & van Ommeren, Jos, 2020. "Urban air pollution and time losses: Evidence from cyclists in London," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Dongsheng Zhan & Mei-Po Kwan & Wenzhong Zhang & Shaojian Wang & Jianhui Yu, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Variations and Driving Factors of Air Pollution in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Huang, Ching-Hsun & Bagdon, Benjamin A., 2018. "Quantifying environmental and health benefits of using woody biomass for electricity generation in the Southwestern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 123-134.
    17. Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Thomas Péran & Thomas Porcher, 2019. "Worker mobility and the purchase of low CO2 emission vehicles in France: a datamining approach," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 16(2), pages 171-205, December.
    18. Weisong Li & Wanxu Chen & Jiaojiao Bian & Jun Xian & Li Zhan, 2022. "Impact of Urbanization on Ecosystem Services Balance in the Han River Ecological Economic Belt, China: A Multi-Scale Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, 2017. "Remote Sensing, Crowd Sensing, and Geospatial Technologies for Public Health: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-3, April.
    20. Duncan A. Robertson, 2019. "Spatial Transmission Models: A Taxonomy and Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 225-243, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:5:p:462-:d:96854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.