IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i3p76-d518994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realistic Aspects of Simulation Models for Fake News Epidemics over Social Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Quintino Francesco Lotito

    (Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123 Povo, TN, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Davide Zanella

    (Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123 Povo, TN, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Paolo Casari

    (Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123 Povo, TN, Italy)

Abstract

The pervasiveness of online social networks has reshaped the way people access information. Online social networks make it common for users to inform themselves online and share news among their peers, but also favor the spreading of both reliable and fake news alike. Because fake news may have a profound impact on the society at large, realistically simulating their spreading process helps evaluate the most effective countermeasures to adopt. It is customary to model the spreading of fake news via the same epidemic models used for common diseases; however, these models often miss concepts and dynamics that are peculiar to fake news spreading. In this paper, we fill this gap by enriching typical epidemic models for fake news spreading with network topologies and dynamics that are typical of realistic social networks. Specifically, we introduce agents with the role of influencers and bots in the model and consider the effects of dynamical network access patterns, time-varying engagement, and different degrees of trust in the sources of circulating information. These factors concur with making the simulations more realistic. Among other results, we show that influencers that share fake news help the spreading process reach nodes that would otherwise remain unaffected. Moreover, we emphasize that bots dramatically speed up the spreading process and that time-varying engagement and network access change the effectiveness of fake news spreading.

Suggested Citation

  • Quintino Francesco Lotito & Davide Zanella & Paolo Casari, 2021. "Realistic Aspects of Simulation Models for Fake News Epidemics over Social Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:76-:d:518994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/3/76/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/3/76/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duncan J. Watts & Steven H. Strogatz, 1998. "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6684), pages 440-442, June.
    2. Marcella Tambuscio & Diego F. M. Oliveira & Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia & Giancarlo Ruffo, 2018. "Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 261-275, September.
    3. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:12435-12440 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jonathan Albright, 2017. "Welcome to the Era of Fake News," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 87-89.
    5. Spricer, Kristoffer & Britton, Tom, 2019. "An SIR epidemic on a weighted network," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 556-580, December.
    6. Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse, 2019. "Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raffaele D’Ambrosio & Giuseppe Giordano & Serena Mottola & Beatrice Paternoster, 2021. "Stiffness Analysis to Predict the Spread Out of Fake Information," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Carrasco-Farré, 2022. "The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Matthew Spradling & Jeremy Straub, 2022. "Evaluation of the Factors That Impact the Perception of Online Content Trustworthiness by Income, Political Affiliation and Online Usage Time," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-55, November.
    3. Jeremy Straub & Matthew Spradling & Bob Fedor, 2022. "Assessment of Factors Impacting the Perception of Online Content Trustworthiness by Age, Education and Gender," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-66, March.
    4. Huan Wang & Chuang Ma & Han-Shuang Chen & Ying-Cheng Lai & Hai-Feng Zhang, 2022. "Full reconstruction of simplicial complexes from binary contagion and Ising data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Vinayak, & Raghuvanshi, Adarsh & kshitij, Avinash, 2023. "Signatures of capacity development through research collaborations in artificial intelligence and machine learning," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    6. Supriya Tiwari & Pallavi Basu, 2024. "Quasi-randomization tests for network interference," Papers 2403.16673, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    7. Anzhi Sheng & Qi Su & Aming Li & Long Wang & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2023. "Constructing temporal networks with bursty activity patterns," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Samrachana Adhikari & Beau Dabbs, 2018. "Social Network Analysis in R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 225-253, April.
    9. Wang, Xiaojie & Slamu, Wushour & Guo, Wenqiang & Wang, Sixiu & Ren, Yan, 2022. "A novel semi local measure of identifying influential nodes in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Ciprian-Octavian Truică & Elena-Simona Apostol, 2022. "MisRoBÆRTa: Transformers versus Misinformation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Lin, Dan & Wu, Jiajing & Xuan, Qi & Tse, Chi K., 2022. "Ethereum transaction tracking: Inferring evolution of transaction networks via link prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    12. Ferreira, D.S.R. & Ribeiro, J. & Oliveira, P.S.L. & Pimenta, A.R. & Freitas, R.P. & Dutra, R.S. & Papa, A.R.R. & Mendes, J.F.F., 2022. "Spatiotemporal analysis of earthquake occurrence in synthetic and worldwide data," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    13. Mario V. Tomasello & Mauro Napoletano & Antonios Garas & Frank Schweitzer, 2017. "The rise and fall of R&D networks," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 617-646.
    14. Qinghu Liao & Wenwen Dong & Boxin Zhao, 2023. "A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Xinyu Huang & Dongming Chen & Dongqi Wang & Tao Ren, 2020. "MINE: Identifying Top- k Vital Nodes in Complex Networks via Maximum Influential Neighbors Expansion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Uğur Baloğlu, 2021. "Trolls, Pressure and Agenda: The discursive fight on Twitter in Turkey," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 39-51.
    17. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Jianhong Chen & Hongcai Ma & Shan Yang, 2023. "SEIOR Rumor Propagation Model Considering Hesitating Mechanism and Different Rumor-Refuting Ways in Complex Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Xiaokun Su & Chenrouyu Zheng & Yefei Yang & Yafei Yang & Wen Zhao & Yue Yu, 2022. "Spatial Structure and Development Patterns of Urban Traffic Flow Network in Less Developed Areas: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Daniel Reisinger & Fabian Tschofenig & Raven Adam & Marie Lisa Kogler & Manfred Füllsack & Fabian Veider & Georg Jäger, 2024. "Patterns of stability in complex contagions," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1895-1911, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:76-:d:518994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.