IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i12p12414-14039d60461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pareto-Optimal Evaluation of Ultimate Limit States in Offshore Wind Turbine Structural Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Muskulus

    (Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 7A, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

The ultimate capacity of support structures is checked with extreme loads. This is straightforward when the limit state equations depend on a single load component, and it has become common to report maxima for each load component. However, if more than one load component is influential, e.g., both axial force and bending moments, it is not straightforward how to define an extreme load. The combination of univariate maxima can be too conservative, and many different combinations of load components can result in the worst value of the limit state equations. The use of contemporaneous load vectors is typically non-conservative. Therefore, in practice, limit state checks are done for each possible load vector, from each time step of a simulation. This is not feasible when performing reliability assessments and structural optimization, where additional, time-consuming computations are involved for each load vector. We therefore propose to use Pareto-optimal loads, which are a small set of loads that together represent all possible worst case scenarios. Simulations with two reference wind turbines show that this approach can be very useful for jacket structures, whereas the design of monopiles is often governed by the bending moment only. Even in this case, the approach might be useful when approaching the structural limits during optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Muskulus, 2015. "Pareto-Optimal Evaluation of Ultimate Limit States in Offshore Wind Turbine Structural Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:12:p:12414-14039:d:60461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/12/12414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/12/12414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John D. Sørensen & Henrik S. Toft, 2010. "Probabilistic Design of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    2. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Min & Qin, Jianjun & Lu, Da-Gang & Zhang, Wei-Heng & Zhu, Jiang-Sheng & Faber, Michael Havbro, 2022. "Towards resilience of offshore wind farms: A framework and application to asset integrity management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    2. Shao, Yizhe & Liu, Jie, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification for dynamic responses of offshore wind turbine based on manifold learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Kostandyan, Erik E. & Sørensen, John D., 2012. "Physics of failure as a basis for solder elements reliability assessment in wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 100-107.
    4. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Liao, Ding & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Correia, José A.F.O. & De Jesus, Abílio M.P. & Veljkovic, Milan & Berto, Filippo, 2022. "Fatigue reliability of wind turbines: historical perspectives, recent developments and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 724-742.
    6. Wilkie, David & Galasso, Carmine, 2020. "A probabilistic framework for offshore wind turbine loss assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1772-1783.
    7. Ramezani, Mahyar & Choe, Do-Eun & Heydarpour, Khashayar & Koo, Bonjun, 2023. "Uncertainty models for the structural design of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Jianjun Qin & Michael Havbro Faber, 2019. "Resilience Informed Integrity Management of Wind Turbine Parks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Hesam Mirzaei Rafsanjani & John Dalsgaard Sørensen & Søren Fæster & Asger Sturlason, 2017. "Fatigue Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbine Cast Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    12. Qin, Mengfei & Shi, Wei & Chai, Wei & Fu, Xing & Li, Lin & Li, Xin, 2023. "Extreme structural response prediction and fatigue damage evaluation for large-scale monopile offshore wind turbines subject to typhoon conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 450-464.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:12:p:12414-14039:d:60461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.