IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v6y2013i6p2966-2981d26472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Effluent Recirculation in a Semi-Continuous Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion System

Author

Listed:
  • Solmaz Aslanzadeh

    (School of Engineering, University of Borås, Borås 501 90, Sweden)

  • Karthik Rajendran

    (School of Engineering, University of Borås, Borås 501 90, Sweden)

  • Azam Jeihanipour

    (Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 81746-73441, Iran)

  • Mohammad J. Taherzadeh

    (School of Engineering, University of Borås, Borås 501 90, Sweden)

Abstract

The effect of recirculation in increasing organic loading rate (OLR) and decreasing hydraulic retention time (HRT) in a semi-continuous two-stage anaerobic digestion system using stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and an upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) was evaluated. Two-parallel processes were in operation for 100 days, one with recirculation (closed system) and the other without recirculation (open system). For this purpose, two structurally different carbohydrate-based substrates were used; starch and cotton. The digestion of starch and cotton in the closed system resulted in production of 91% and 80% of the theoretical methane yield during the first 60 days. In contrast, in the open system the methane yield was decreased to 82% and 56% of the theoretical value, for starch and cotton, respectively. The OLR could successfully be increased to 4 gVS/L/day for cotton and 10 gVS/L/day for starch. It is concluded that the recirculation supports the microorganisms for effective hydrolysis of polyhydrocarbons in CSTR and to preserve the nutrients in the system at higher OLRs, thereby improving the overall performance and stability of the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Solmaz Aslanzadeh & Karthik Rajendran & Azam Jeihanipour & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2013. "The Effect of Effluent Recirculation in a Semi-Continuous Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:6:p:2966-2981:d:26472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/6/2966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/6/2966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chynoweth, David P & Owens, John M & Legrand, Robert, 2001. "Renewable methane from anaerobic digestion of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-8.
    2. Asam, Zaki-ul-Zaman & Poulsen, Tjalfe Gorm & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Rafique, Rashad & Kiely, Ger & Murphy, Jerry D., 2011. "How can we improve biomethane production per unit of feedstock in biogas plants?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2013-2018, June.
    3. Jeihanipour, Azam & Aslanzadeh, Solmaz & Rajendran, Karthik & Balasubramanian, Gopinath & Taherzadeh, Mohammad J., 2013. "High-rate biogas production from waste textiles using a two-stage process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 128-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    2. Frauke P. C. Müller & Gerd-Christian Maack & Wolfgang Buescher, 2017. "Effects of Biogas Substrate Recirculation on Methane Yield and Efficiency of a Liquid-Manure-Based Biogas Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Rajendran, Karthik & Mahapatra, Durgamadhab & Venkatraman, Arun Venkatesh & Muthuswamy, Shanmugaprakash & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, 2020. "Advancing anaerobic digestion through two-stage processes: Current developments and future trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    4. Notodarmojo, Peni Astrini & Fujiwara, Takeshi & Habuer, & Pham Van, Dinh, 2022. "Effectiveness of oyster shell as alkali additive for two-stage anaerobic co-digestion: Carbon flow analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    5. Azad Pashaki, Saeed Ghanbari & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Ebrahimi-Nik, Mohammadali & Rohani, Abbas, 2021. "Treatment of municipal landfill leachate: Optimization of organic loading rate in a two-stage CSTR followed by aerobic degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1210-1221.
    6. Chong, Daniel Jia Sheng & Chan, Yi Jing & Arumugasamy, Senthil Kumar & Yazdi, Sara Kazemi & Lim, Jun Wei, 2023. "Optimisation and performance evaluation of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in the prediction of biogas production ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Luz Breton-Deval & Ilse Salinas-Peralta & Jaime Santiago Alarcón Aguirre & Belkis Sulbarán-Rangel & Kelly Joel Gurubel Tun, 2020. "Taxonomic Binning Approaches and Functional Characteristics of the Microbial Community during the Anaerobic Digestion of Hydrolyzed Corncob," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frauke P. C. Müller & Gerd-Christian Maack & Wolfgang Buescher, 2017. "Effects of Biogas Substrate Recirculation on Methane Yield and Efficiency of a Liquid-Manure-Based Biogas Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Lerato Shikwambana & Boitumelo Mokgoja & Paidamwoyo Mhangara, 2022. "A Qualitative Assessment of the Trends, Distribution and Sources of Methane in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Zarzuelo, Carmen & López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2018. "Impact of human interventions on tidal stream power: The case of Cádiz Bay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 88-104.
    5. Anna Lymperatou & Niels B. Rasmussen & Hariklia N. Gavala & Ioannis V. Skiadas, 2021. "Improving the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure through an Optimized Ammonia Treatment: Process Performance, Digestate and Techno-Economic Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Senghor, A. & Dioh, R.M.N. & Müller, C. & Youm, I., 2017. "Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 548-554.
    7. Di Corato, Luca & Moretto, Michele, 2011. "Investing in biogas: Timing, technological choice and the value of flexibility from input mix," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1186-1193.
    8. Surita, Sharon C. & Tansel, Berrin, 2015. "Preliminary investigation to characterize deposits forming during combustion of biogas from anaerobic digesters and landfills," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 674-681.
    9. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    10. Jingura, Raphael Muzondiwa & Musademba, Downmore & Kamusoko, Reckson, 2013. "A review of the state of biomass energy technologies in Zimbabwe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 652-659.
    11. Katarzyna Ignatowicz & Gabriel Filipczak & Barbara Dybek & Grzegorz Wałowski, 2023. "Biogas Production Depending on the Substrate Used: A Review and Evaluation Study—European Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Costa, J.C. & Oliveira, J.V. & Alves, M.M., 2016. "Response surface design to study the influence of inoculum, particle size and inoculum to substrate ratio on the methane production from Ulex sp," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB), pages 1071-1077.
    13. O’Shea, Richard & Kilgallon, Ian & Wall, David & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Quantification and location of a renewable gas industry based on digestion of wastes in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 229-239.
    14. Oreggioni, G.D. & Luberti, M. & Tassou, S.A., 2019. "Agricultural greenhouse CO2 utilization in anaerobic-digestion-based biomethane production plants: A techno-economic and environmental assessment and comparison with CO2 geological storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1753-1766.
    15. Uusitalo, V. & Soukka, R. & Horttanainen, M. & Niskanen, A. & Havukainen, J., 2013. "Economics and greenhouse gas balance of biogas use systems in the Finnish transportation sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 132-140.
    16. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    17. Francesca Nardin & Fabrizio Mazzetto, 2014. "Mapping of Biomass Fluxes: A Method for Optimizing Biogas-Refinery of Livestock Effluents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Browne, James & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Thamsiriroj, T & Murphy, Jerry D., 2011. "Assessing the cost of biofuel production with increasing penetration of the transport fuel market: A case study of gaseous biomethane in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4537-4547.
    19. Eleni Iacovidou & Jonathan Busch & John N. Hahladakis & Helen Baxter & Kok Siew Ng & Ben M. J. Herbert, 2017. "A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    20. O'Shea, R. & Wall, D.M. & Murphy, J.D., 2017. "An energy and greenhouse gas comparison of centralised biogas production with road haulage of pig slurry, and decentralised biogas production with biogas transportation in a low-pressure pipe network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 108-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:6:p:2966-2981:d:26472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.