IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1027-d1595648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Energies and Biochar: A Green Alternative for Reducing Carbon Footprints Using Tree Species from the Southern Andean Region of Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Juan-Carlos Cobos-Torres

    (Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador
    Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

  • Luis-Holguer Idrovo-Ortiz

    (Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

  • Sandra Lucia Cobos-Mora

    (Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador
    Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

  • Vinicio Santillan

    (Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

Abstract

The urgent need for sustainable strategies to mitigate climate change has spurred the development of efficient carbon sequestration methods with minimal greenhouse gas emissions, presenting promising opportunities to produce biochar and, with this bioproduct, enhance crop productivity. Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate the carbon footprint produced by the low-temperature slow pyrolysis of biomass obtained from the pruning residues of four tree species present in parks and gardens of the southern Andean region of Ecuador. An electric reactor (ER), powered by 44 solar panels of 535 W each, was used to perform the pyrolysis process at 350 °C over four hours. For each species— Persea americana , Polylepis spp., Acacia spp., and Prunus salicifolia —three replicates of the process were conducted using 1.5 kg of biomass per trial. The results showed that Acacia spp. residues produced biochar with higher bulk density (0.303 g/cm 3 ), organic matter (82.85%), total organic carbon (71.21%), oxygen (27.84%), C/N ratio (120.69), and potassium (459.12 ppm). The biochar produced from Prunus salicifolia exhibited the highest levels of pollutant gas emissions and carbon footprint (5.93 × 10 −6 ton∙m −3 CO 2 eq and 0.001067 ton∙m −3 CO 2 eq, respectively). In contrast, the biochar produced from Polylepis spp. was the least polluting (0.001018 ton∙m −3 CO 2 eq), highlighting its potential as a source for biochar production from tree species found in the southern Andean region of Ecuador. Meanwhile, the pyrolysis of Persea americana (avocado) resulted in very low gas emissions, although it exhibited the second-highest carbon footprint due to the high energy consumption associated with the process. In conclusion, this study identified Persea americana and Polylepis spp. as the best options for biochar production through pyrolysis, positioning them as viable alternatives for developing sustainable strategies to mitigate climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan-Carlos Cobos-Torres & Luis-Holguer Idrovo-Ortiz & Sandra Lucia Cobos-Mora & Vinicio Santillan, 2025. "Renewable Energies and Biochar: A Green Alternative for Reducing Carbon Footprints Using Tree Species from the Southern Andean Region of Ecuador," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1027-:d:1595648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexis Dinno, 2015. "Nonparametric pairwise multiple comparisons in independent groups using Dunn's test," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 15(1), pages 292-300, March.
    2. Ana B. Cuevas & David E. Leiva-Candia & M. P. Dorado, 2024. "An Overview of Pyrolysis as Waste Treatment to Produce Eco-Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Gil, Antoni & Barreneche, Camila & Moreno, Pere & Solé, Cristian & Inés Fernández, A. & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2013. "Thermal behaviour of d-mannitol when used as PCM: Comparison of results obtained by DSC and in a thermal energy storage unit at pilot plant scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1107-1113.
    4. José Alberto Soria-González & Raúl Tauro & José Juan Alvarado-Flores & Víctor Manuel Berrueta-Soriano & José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones, 2022. "Avocado Tree Pruning Pellets ( Persea americana Mill.) for Energy Purposes: Characterization and Quality Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Tomasz Kalak, 2023. "Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Raúl Tauro & Borja Velázquez-Martí & Silvina Manrique & Martin Ricker & René Martínez-Bravo & Víctor M. Ruiz-García & Saraí Ramos-Vargas & Omar Masera & José A. Soria-González & Cynthia Armendáriz-Arn, 2022. "Potential Use of Pruning Residues from Avocado Trees as Energy Input in Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zofia Grodek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Aneta Piechaczek & Luis Ochoa Siguencia, 2021. "Assessment and Comparison of Digital Competences in Education for Selected European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 348-361.
    2. Natalia Matłok & Grzegorz Zaguła & Józef Gorzelany & Maciej Balawejder, 2024. "Analysis of the Energy Potential of Waste Biomass Generated from Fruit Tree Seedling Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Alva, Guruprasad & Lin, Yaxue & Fang, Guiyin, 2018. "An overview of thermal energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 341-378.
    4. Andreas Aditya Hermawan & Amin Talei & Janet Yip Cheng Leong & Mayuran Jayatharan & Hui Weng Goh & Sina Alaghmand, 2019. "Performance Assessment of a Laboratory Scale Prototype Biofiltration System in Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Sisi Que & Yu Huang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Liang Wang & Songlin Liu, 2023. "Discrete Choice Experiment Consideration: A Framework for Mining Community Consultation with Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Joanna F. Dipnall & Belinda J. Gabbe & Warwick J. Teague & Ben Beck, 2020. "Identifying Homogeneous Patterns of Injury in Paediatric Trauma Patients to Improve Risk-Adjusted Models of Mortality and Functional Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Annika Johanna Thies & Felicitas Schneider & Josef Efken, 2021. "The Meat We Do Not Eat. A Survey of Meat Waste in German Hospitality and Food Service Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Mirosław Wyszkowski & Natalia Kordala, 2024. "Trace Elements in Maize Biomass Used to Phyto-Stabilise Iron-Contaminated Soils for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Raúl Tauro & Silvina Manrique & Iván Franch-Pardo & Juan F. Charre-Medellin & Cristian E. Ortega-Riascos & José A. Soria-González & Cynthia Armendáriz-Arnez, 2024. "Spatial expansion of avocado in Mexico: Could the energy use of pruning residues offset orchard GHG emissions?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27325-27350, November.
    10. Tashara M. Leak & Felicia Setiono & Navika Gangrade & Erika Mudrak, 2019. "Youth Willingness to Purchase Whole Grain Snack Packs from New York City Corner Stores Participating in a Healthy Retail Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Pereira da Cunha, Jose & Eames, Philip, 2016. "Thermal energy storage for low and medium temperature applications using phase change materials – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 227-238.
    12. Chen, Wen-Lih & Sirisha, Vadlakonda & Yu, Chi-Yuan & Wang, Yan-Ru & Dai, Ming-Wei & Lasek, Janusz & Li, Yueh-Heng, 2024. "Design and optimization of a combined heat and power system with a fluidized-bed combustor and stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    13. Dorceta E. Taylor & Katherine Allison & Tevin Hamilton & Ashley Bell, 2023. "Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Food Access in Two Predominantly White Cities: The Case of Lansing, East Lansing, and Surrounding Townships in Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-49, October.
    14. Maria Celeste Gomez & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2022. "Wages and productivity in Argentinian manufacturing. A structuralist and distributional firm-level analysis," LEM Papers Series 2022/37, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    15. Dominika Gajdosikova & Katarina Valaskova & Tomas Kliestik & Maria Kovacova, 2023. "Research on Corporate Indebtedness Determinants: A Case Study of Visegrad Group Countries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Escribà, Marc & Barreneche, Camila & Yara-Varón, Edinson & Eras, Jordi & Solé, Aran & Tomàs, Albert & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Canela-Garayoa, Ramon, 2017. "Ionic compounds derived from crude glycerol: Thermal energy storage capability evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 629-637.
    17. Rita Bastião & Nuno de Sousa Pereira, 2020. "Performance in the Delivery of Primary Health Care Services: A Longitudinal Analysis," CEF.UP Working Papers 2002, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    18. Liu, Huan & Jing, Jianwei & Liu, Jianxin & Wang, Xiaodong, 2024. "Sugar alcohol-based phase change materials for thermal energy storage: Optimization design and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Kumaresan, G. & Santosh, R. & Raju, G. & Velraj, R., 2018. "Experimental and numerical investigation of solar flat plate cooking unit for domestic applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 436-447.
    20. Germán Navarrete Cereijo & Pedro Galione Klot & Pedro Curto-Risso, 2024. "Two-Stage Global Biomass Pyrolysis Model for Combustion Applications: Predicting Product Composition with a Focus on Kinetics, Energy, and Mass Balances Consistency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1027-:d:1595648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.