IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p635-d1580210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Spatial Differences and Influencing Factors of Carbon-Emission Reduction Efficiency of New-Energy Vehicles in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lingyao Wang

    (School of Internet of Things, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Taofeng Wu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Fangrong Ren

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

Abstract

As new-energy vehicles (NEVs) gradually gain public attention, their carbon-reduction issues have become a focal point in academia. This study evaluates the carbon-reduction efficiency of NEVs in 21 Chinese provinces using an improved three-stage DEA model, analyzes spatial disparities with the Dagum Gini coefficient, and decomposes carbon-emission factors using the LMDI method. Results show that the overall carbon-reduction efficiency is low, with an average value of only 0.266. Significant differences exist in production- and consumption-stage efficiencies across regions. Shanxi Province performed the best, with efficiency scores of 1 in both stages, while the carbon-reduction stage showed the lowest efficiency, ranging between 0.2 and 0.3 in most regions. The central region exhibited the highest carbon-reduction efficiency, followed by the western and eastern regions, primarily influenced by intra-regional disparities. Energy intensity significantly suppresses carbon emissions, followed by energy structure, while economic development and population size positively contribute to carbon emissions. This study provides theoretical support for regional governments to formulate policies related to the NEV industry and offers practical guidance for its further development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingyao Wang & Taofeng Wu & Fangrong Ren, 2025. "Analysis of Spatial Differences and Influencing Factors of Carbon-Emission Reduction Efficiency of New-Energy Vehicles in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:635-:d:1580210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenn, Alan & Azevedo, Inês & Michalek, Jeremy Joseph, 2019. "Alternative-Fuel-Vehicle Policy Interactions Increase U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions," OSF Preprints n69tp, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jenn, Alan & Azevedo, Inês L. & Michalek, Jeremy J., 2019. "Alternative-fuel-vehicle policy interactions increase U.S. greenhouse gas emissions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 396-407.
    3. Ayetor, G.K. & Quansah, David A. & Adjei, Eunice A., 2020. "Towards zero vehicle emissions in Africa: A case study of Ghana," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Zheng, Siqi & Wu, Jing & Kahn, Matthew E. & Deng, Yongheng, 2012. "The nascent market for “green” real estate in Beijing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 974-984.
    5. Li, Jiachen & Jiang, Meiru & Li, Ge, 2024. "Does the new energy vehicles subsidy policy decrease the carbon emissions of the urban transport industry? Evidence from Chinese cities in Yangtze River Delta," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    6. Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo, 2019. "Who will buy electric vehicles after early adopters? Using machine learning to identify the electric vehicle mainstream market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 243-254.
    7. Wang, Qunwei & Chiu, Yung-Ho & Chiu, Ching-Ren, 2015. "Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: A modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 252-260.
    8. Zhang, Xinghui & Li, Zhao & Luo, Lingai & Fan, Yilin & Du, Zhengyu, 2022. "A review on thermal management of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    9. Gao, Zhihui & Zhang, Qi & Liu, Boyu & Liu, Jiangfeng & Wang, Ge & Ni, Ruiyan & Yang, Kexin, 2024. "The driving factors and mitigation strategy of CO2 emissions from China's passenger vehicle sector towards carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Tan, Ruipeng, 2017. "Estimation of the environmental values of electric vehicles in Chinese cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 221-229.
    11. Lévay, Petra Zsuzsa & Drossinos, Yannis & Thiel, Christian, 2017. "The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 524-533.
    12. Choi, Wonjae & Yoo, Eunji & Seol, Eunsu & Kim, Myoungsoo & Song, Han Ho, 2020. "Greenhouse gas emissions of conventional and alternative vehicles: Predictions based on energy policy analysis in South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Jenn, Alan & Azevedo, Inês & Michalek, Jeremy Joseph, 2019. "Alternative-Fuel-Vehicle Policy Interactions Increase U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions," OSF Preprints n69tp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Min & Sun, Tao, 2022. "Dynamic spatial spillover effect of new energy vehicle industry policies on carbon emission of transportation sector in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    3. Guo, Shuocheng & Kontou, Eleftheria, 2021. "Disparities and equity issues in electric vehicles rebate allocation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Greene, David L. & Greenwald, Judith M. & Ciez, Rebecca E., 2020. "U.S. fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards: What have they achieved and what have we learned?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna & Kott, Joanna & Kott, Marek, 2020. "Why Polish market of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) is the smallest in Europe? SWOT analysis of opportunities and threats," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & McCollum, David, 2022. "Which “second-best” climate policies are best? Simulating cost-effective policy mixes for passenger vehicles," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Caulfield, Brian & Furszyfer, Dylan & Stefaniec, Agnieszka & Foley, Aoife, 2022. "Measuring the equity impacts of government subsidies for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    8. Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J., 2020. "Who will bell the cat? On the environmental and sustainability risks of electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 79-81.
    9. Kim, Jae Hun & Lee, Gunwoo & Park, Ji Young & Hong, Jungyeol & Park, Juneyoung, 2019. "Consumer intentions to purchase battery electric vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 736-743.
    10. Yeh, Sonia & Burtraw, Dallas & Sterner, Thomas & Greene, David, 2021. "Tradable performance standards in the transportation sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Liepold, Constanze & Fabianek, Paul & Madlener, Reinhard, 2024. "A critical evaluation of the 2022 greenhouse gas mitigation quota in Germany from an environmental economics and policy perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Austmann, Leonhard M. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2021. "Does environmental awareness fuel the electric vehicle market? A Twitter keyword analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Rhodes, Ekaterina & Scott, William A. & Jaccard, Mark, 2021. "Designing flexible regulations to mitigate climate change: A cross-country comparative policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Liepold, Constanze & Fabianek, Paul & Madlener, Reinhard, 2023. "A Critical Evaluation of the 2022 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Quota in Germany from an Environmental Economics and Policy Perspective," FCN Working Papers 10/2023, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    15. Lipeng Xu & Chongwang Tian & Chunjiang Bao & Jinsheng Zhao & Xuning Leng, 2023. "Improving the Electrochemical Performance of Core–Shell LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 Cathode Materials Using Environmentally Friendly Phase Structure Control Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Li, Cunfang & Li, Danping & Zhang, Xiaoxu, 2019. "Why can China's coal resource-exhausted enterprises cross the district to transfer?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-105.
    17. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s mining industry: Evidence and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-87.
    18. Anne Christine Lusk & Xin Li & Qiming Liu, 2023. "If the Government Pays for Full Home-Charger Installation, Would Affordable-Housing and Middle-Income Residents Buy Electric Vehicles?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Ye, Hui & Wu, Fei & Yan, Tiantian & Li, Zexuan & Zheng, Zhengnan & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "Decarbonizing urban passenger transportation: Policy effectiveness and interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    20. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:635-:d:1580210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.