IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i5p985-d1342175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Overhead Crane Energy Consumption Using Different Container Loading Strategies in Urban Logistics Hubs

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Kłodawski

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Roland Jachimowski

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Norbert Chamier-Gliszczyński

    (Faculty of Technology and Education, Koszalin University of Technology, 75-453 Koszalin, Poland)

Abstract

This study addresses the critical gap in the literature regarding the energy efficiency of intermodal terminals in smart cities, mainly focusing on crane operations during train loading processes. Novelty’s contribution lies in developing a comprehensive simulation model in FlexSim, where quantitative analysis of crane energy consumption, factoring in container location in the storage yard, rehandling operations, and crane movement strategies were performed. Moreover, the analysis of hoist, trolley, and gantry movements was performed to evaluate their impact on overall container loading process energy efficiency. The findings reveal that the choice of train loading method significantly influences crane energy consumption, thereby affecting the operational costs, environmental footprint, and energy efficiency of the logistics hub in the form of an intermodal terminal. This research provides a methodology for assessing and enhancing the energy efficiency of intermodal terminals and highlights the broader implications for smart city sustainability goals, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, lower operating costs, and improved transportation infrastructure. The outcomes of this research can possibly support smart city planners and logistics managers in making informed decisions to optimise intermodal terminal operations, contributing to urban areas’ sustainable development and economic resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Kłodawski & Roland Jachimowski & Norbert Chamier-Gliszczyński, 2024. "Analysis of the Overhead Crane Energy Consumption Using Different Container Loading Strategies in Urban Logistics Hubs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:985-:d:1342175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Jonker & M. B. Duinkerken & N. Yorke-Smith & A. Waal & R. R. Negenborn, 2021. "Coordinated optimization of equipment operations in a container terminal," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 281-311, June.
    2. Harry Geerlings & Robert Heij & Ron van Duin, 2018. "Opportunities for peak shaving the energy demand of ship-to-shore quay cranes at container terminals," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Daniela Ambrosino & Claudia Caballini & Silvia Siri, 2013. "A mathematical model to evaluate different train loading and stacking policies in a container terminal," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(3), pages 292-308, September.
    4. Zhang, Canrong & Guan, Hao & Yuan, Yifei & Chen, Weiwei & Wu, Tao, 2020. "Machine learning-driven algorithms for the container relocation problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 102-131.
    5. Meisu Zhong & Yongsheng Yang & Yamin Zhou & Octavian Postolache, 2019. "Adaptive Autotuning Mathematical Approaches for Integrated Optimization of Automated Container Terminal," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, November.
    6. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    7. Julian Allen & Michael Browne & Allan Woodburn & Jacques Leonardi, 2012. "The Role of Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 473-490, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilde Heggen & Kris Braekers & An Caris, 2018. "A multi-objective approach for intermodal train load planning," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(2), pages 341-366, March.
    2. Ambrosino, Daniela & Siri, Silvia, 2015. "Comparison of solution approaches for the train load planning problem in seaport terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 65-82.
    3. Behzad Behdani & Bart Wiegmans & Violeta Roso & Hercules Haralambides, 2020. "Port-hinterland transport and logistics: emerging trends and frontier research," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Park, Hyeongjun & Park, Dongjoo & Jeong, In-Jae, 2016. "An effects analysis of logistics collaboration in last-mile networks for CEP delivery services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    5. Daniela Ambrosino & Claudia Caballini, 2019. "New solution approaches for the train load planning problem," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 299-325, September.
    6. Daniele Crotti & Elena Maggi, 2023. "Social Responsibility and Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport Markets," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(2), pages 829-850, July.
    7. Gardrat, Mathieu, 2021. "Urban growth and freight transport: From sprawl to distension," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Amaya, Johanna & Arellana, Julian & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira, 2020. "Stakeholders perceptions to sustainable urban freight policies in emerging markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-348.
    10. Daniele Crotti & Elena Maggi, 2017. "Urban Distribution Centres and Competition among Logistics Providers: a Hotelling Approach," SAS: Society and Sustainability 256057, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    11. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Carla de Oliveira Leite Nascimento & Paulo Renato de Sousa & Paulo Tarso Vilela de Resende & Francisco Gildemir Ferreira da Silva, 2019. "Transport Service Provider Perception of Barriers and Urban Freight Policies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    13. Mehran Farzadmehr & Valentin Carlan & Thierry Vanelslander, 2023. "Contemporary challenges and AI solutions in port operations: applying Gale–Shapley algorithm to find best matches," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-44, December.
    14. Zhongbin Zhao & Xifu Wang & Suxin Cheng & Wei Liu & Lijun Jiang, 2022. "A New Synchronous Handling Technology of Double Stack Container Trains in Sea-Rail Intermodal Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.
    16. Rui Ren & Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bo Sun & Yicun Chen & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Green and Sustainable Logistics: Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trend and Knowledge Taxonomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Serban Raicu & Dorinela Costescu & Stefan Burciu, 2020. "Distribution System with Flow Consolidation at the Boundary of Urban Congested Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Shujuan Guo & Cuijie Diao & Gang Li & Katsuhiko Takahashi, 2021. "The Two-Echelon Dual-Channel Models for the Intermodal Container Terminals of the China Railway Express Considering Container Accumulation Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Mulholland, Eamonn & Teter, Jacob & Cazzola, Pierpaolo & McDonald, Zane & Ó Gallachóir, Brian P., 2018. "The long haul towards decarbonising road freight – A global assessment to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 678-693.
    20. Yan, Baicheng & Jin, Jian Gang & Zhu, Xiaoning & Lee, Der-Horng & Wang, Li & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Integrated planning of train schedule template and container transshipment operation in seaport railway terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:985-:d:1342175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.