IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v132y2020icp329-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders perceptions to sustainable urban freight policies in emerging markets

Author

Listed:
  • Amaya, Johanna
  • Arellana, Julian
  • Delgado-Lindeman, Maira

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the perceptions of key stakeholders to a set of policies designed to address urban logistics issues in two cities in Colombia. A ranking survey was conducted and analyzed unveiling levels of acceptance to the proposed policies for three types of stakeholders (Carriers, Receivers, and Citizens). Though some methodologies attempt to understand stakeholders’ perspectives towards urban freight policies, often only a certain type of stakeholder is considered; perceptions of Citizens are usually overlooked. The results suggest that stakeholders agree on the importance of having space to conduct freight operations in their urban areas. However, different stakeholders perceive policies differently and local context plays a key role, suggesting that decision-makers must consider these aspects before transferring initiatives from other urban settings. When space for freight operations cannot be provided, the results show that Carriers prefer a Receiver-led Consolidation program, Receivers consider an Urban Consolidation Center as the best alternative, and Citizens prefer Off-hour deliveries. While all of the preferred alternatives call for a more active role played by the other stakeholders, they also call for more sustainable practices and move away from traditional, restrictive policies. The results from this study serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers seeking input on the preferences of various stakeholders to, and the potential acceptability of, urban freight policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Amaya, Johanna & Arellana, Julian & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira, 2020. "Stakeholders perceptions to sustainable urban freight policies in emerging markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-348.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:329-348
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856418316859
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 55-77, March.
    2. Kim, Junghwa & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fujii, Satoshi & Noland, Robert B., 2013. "Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 50-62.
    3. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Marciani, Massimo & Cossu, Paola, 2017. "Measuring the effects of an urban freight policy package defined via a collaborative governance model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 3-9.
    4. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    5. Ballantyne, Erica E.F. & Lindholm, Maria & Whiteing, Anthony, 2013. "A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 93-101.
    6. Francesco Audrino & Peter Bühlmann, 2001. "Tree‐structured generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 727-744.
    7. Cherrett, Tom & Allen, Julian & McLeod, Fraser & Maynard, Sarah & Hickford, Adrian & Browne, Mike, 2012. "Understanding urban freight activity – key issues for freight planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 22-32.
    8. Holgui­n-Veras, José & Wang, Qian & Xu, Ning & Ozbay, Kaan & Cetin, Mecit & Polimeni, John, 2006. "The impacts of time of day pricing on the behavior of freight carriers in a congested urban area: Implications to road pricing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 744-766, November.
    9. José Holguín-Veras & Michael Silas & John Polimeni & Brenda Cruz, 2008. "An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Joint Receiver–Carrier Policies to Increase Truck Traffic in the Off-peak Hours," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 327-354, December.
    10. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Wenneman, Adam & Habib, Khandker Nurul & Roorda, Matthew J., 2014. "Truck parking in urban areas: Application of choice modelling within traffic microsimulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-64.
    11. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci, 2014. "Urban Freight Transport Policy Changes: Improving Decision Makers’ Awareness Via An Agent-Specific Approach," Working Papers 0114, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2014.
    12. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Seruya, Barbara B., 2017. "Urban freight policymaking: The role of qualitative and quantitative research," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 75-85.
    13. Lee, Paul H. & Yu, Philip L.H., 2010. "Distance-based tree models for ranking data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1672-1682, June.
    14. Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo & Fransoo, Jan C., 2015. "How logistics performance of freight operators is affected by urban freight distribution issues," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-47.
    15. Ana Margarita Larranaga & Julián Arellana & Luis Ignacio Rizzi & Orlando Strambi & Helena Beatriz Bettella Cybis, 2019. "Using best–worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: a study of Porto Alegre, Brazil," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2347-2379, December.
    16. Ben-Akiva, Moshe & Morikawa, Takayuki & Shiroishi, Fumiaki, 1992. "Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 149-164, March.
    17. Julian Allen & Michael Browne & Allan Woodburn & Jacques Leonardi, 2012. "The Role of Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 473-490, April.
    18. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2014. "Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers' awareness via an agent-specific approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 248-252.
    19. Gehlert, Tina & Kramer, Christiane & Nielsen, Otto Anker & Schlag, Bernhard, 2011. "Socioeconomic differences in public acceptability and car use adaptation towards urban road pricing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 685-694, September.
    20. Di Ciommo, Floridea & Monzón, Andrés & Fernandez-Heredia, Alvaro, 2013. "Improving the analysis of road pricing acceptability surveys by using hybrid models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 302-316.
    21. Leise K. Oliveira & Betty Barraza & Bruno V. Bertocini & Cassiano A. Isler & Dannúbia R. Pires & Ellen C. N. Madalon & Jéssica Lima & José G. V. Vieira & Leonardo H. Meira & Lilian S. F. P. Bracarense, 2018. "An Overview of Problems and Solutions for Urban Freight Transport in Brazilian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    22. Eliasson, Jonas & Jonsson, Lina, 2011. "The unexpected "yes": Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 636-647, August.
    23. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Fransoo, Jan C. & Carvalho, Carla Deguirmendjian, 2015. "Freight distribution in megacities: Perspectives of shippers, logistics service providers and carriers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 46-54.
    24. Ramos, Raúl & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián & Sarmiento, Iván, 2017. "From restricting the use of cars by license plate numbers to congestion charging: Analysis for Medellin, Colombia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 119-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Aijun & Zhu, Qiuyun & Xu, Lei & Lu, Qiang & Fan, Youqing, 2021. "Sustainable supply chain management for perishable products in emerging markets: An integrated location-inventory-routing model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Cantillo, Víctor & Amaya, Johanna & Serrano, Iván & Cantillo-García, Víctor & Galván, Janer, 2022. "Influencing factors of trucking companies willingness to shift to alternative fuel vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Amaya, Johanna & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira & Arellana, Julian & Allen, Jaime, 2021. "Urban freight logistics: What do citizens perceive?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Demostenis Ramos Cassiano & Bruno Vieira Bertoncini & Leise Kelli de Oliveira, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Based on the Activity System and Transportation System for Sustainable Urban Freight Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Dorota Kuchta & Jagoda Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka, 2020. "An Approach to Increase the Sustainability of Projects and their Outcomes in Public Sector through Improving Project Definition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Amaya, Johanna & Encarnación, Trilce & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira, 2023. "Understanding Delivery Drivers’ Parking Preferences in Urban Freight Operations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Bahareh Mansouri & Subhasmita Sahu & M. Ali Ülkü, 2023. "Toward Greening City Logistics: A Systematic Review on Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility in Managing Urban Distribution Centers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2020. "A multi-criteria spatial evaluation framework to optimise the siting of freight consolidation facilities in inner-city areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 51-69.
    9. Cesar Eduardo Leite & Sérgio Ronaldo Granemann & Ari Melo Mariano & Leise Kelli de Oliveira, 2022. "Opinion of Residents about the Freight Transport and Its Influence on the Quality of Life: An Analysis for Brasília (Brazil)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Mohammad Zaher Akkad & Tamás Bányai, 2020. "Multi-Objective Approach for Optimization of City Logistics Considering Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Luis A. Guzman & Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia & Julian Arellana & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2023. "User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 751-771, June.
    12. Juan Garcia-Pajoy & Nelson Paz Ruiz & Mario Chong & Ana Luna, 2023. "Utilising PLS-SEM and Km 2 Methodology in Urban Logistics Analysis: A Case Study on Popayan, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Chu, Xiang & Liu, Jun & Ren, Long & Gong, Daqing, 2020. "Optimal contract design with a common agency in last-mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Teschendorf, Robert & Engelhardt, Maximilian & Malzahn, Birte & Husemann, Markus & Butz, Christian & Seeck, Stephan, 2022. "Sustainable urban logistics concepts: A collaborative design approach considering stakeholder perspectives," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 799-822, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Sears, Sean & Moataz, Mohamed & Ferguson, Mark & Razavi, Saiedeh & Páez, Antonio, 2022. "Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akgün, Emine Zehra & Monios, Jason & Rye, Tom & Fonzone, Achille, 2019. "Influences on urban freight transport policy choice by local authorities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 88-98.
    2. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Sanchez-Diaz, Ivan & Browne, Michael & Wojtowicz, Jeffrey, 2020. "State of the art and practice of urban freight management Part II: Financial approaches, logistics, and demand management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 383-410.
    3. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese & Shucheng Luo & Antonino Sgalambro, 2023. "A game-theoretic multi-stakeholder model for cost allocation in urban consolidation centres," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 663-686, May.
    4. Amaya, Johanna & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira & Arellana, Julian & Allen, Jaime, 2021. "Urban freight logistics: What do citizens perceive?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Priscila Pereira Suzart Carvalho & Ricardo Araújo Kalid & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez & Sandro Breval Santiago, 2019. "Interactions among stakeholders in the processes of city logistics: a systematic review of the literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 567-607, August.
    6. Sears, Sean & Moataz, Mohamed & Ferguson, Mark & Razavi, Saiedeh & Páez, Antonio, 2022. "Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-45.
    7. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Scaccia, Luisa, 2015. "Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 239-249.
    8. Ramos, Raúl & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián & Sarmiento, Iván, 2017. "From restricting the use of cars by license plate numbers to congestion charging: Analysis for Medellin, Colombia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 119-130.
    9. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2017. "Investigating the potential for off-hour deliveries in the city of Rome: Retailers’ perceptions and stated reactions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 142-156.
    10. dell’Olio, Luigi & Moura, Jose Luis & Ibeas, Angel & Cordera, Ruben & Holguin-Veras, Jose, 2017. "Receivers’ willingness-to-adopt novel urban goods distribution practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 130-141.
    11. Lindawati & Johan van Schagen & Mark Goh & Robert de Souza, 2014. "Collaboration in urban logistics: motivations and barriers," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 278-290, July.
    12. Letnik, Tomislav & Marksel, Maršenka & Luppino, Giuseppe & Bardi, Andrea & Božičnik, Stane, 2018. "Review of policies and measures for sustainable and energy efficient urban transport," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 245-257.
    13. Caspersen, Elise & Ørving, Tale & Tennøy, Aud, 2023. "Capacity reduction on urban main roads: How truck drivers adapted, and what effects and consequences they experienced," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 68-83.
    14. Pedro A. P. Dias & Hugo Yoshizaki & Patricia Favero & Jose Geraldo Vidal Vieira, 2019. "Daytime or Overnight Deliveries? Perceptions of Drivers and Retailers in São Paulo City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Kim, Haena & Goodchild, Anne & Boyle, Linda Ng, 2021. "Empirical analysis of commercial vehicle dwell times around freight-attracting urban buildings in downtown Seattle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 320-338.
    16. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Seruya, Barbara B., 2017. "Urban freight policymaking: The role of qualitative and quantitative research," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 75-85.
    17. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Carla de Oliveira Leite Nascimento & Paulo Renato de Sousa & Paulo Tarso Vilela de Resende & Francisco Gildemir Ferreira da Silva, 2019. "Transport Service Provider Perception of Barriers and Urban Freight Policies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Le Pira, Michela, 2018. "Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 119-132.
    19. Holguín-Veras, José & Sánchez-Díaz, Iván, 2016. "Freight Demand Management and the Potential of Receiver-Led Consolidation programs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 109-130.
    20. Konstantina Katsela & Michael Browne, 2019. "Importance of the Stakeholders’ Interaction: Comparative, Longitudinal Study of Two City Logistics Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:329-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.