IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i24p6409-d1547955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method of Estimating Energy Consumption for Intermodal Terminal Loading System Design

Author

Listed:
  • Mariusz Brzeziński

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Dariusz Pyza

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Joanna Archutowska

    (Collegium of Business Administration, Warsaw School of Economics, Niepodległości 162, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Budzik

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Numerous studies address the estimation of energy consumption at intermodal terminals, with a primary focus on existing facilities. However, a significant research gap lies in the lack of reliable methods and tools for the ex ante estimation of energy consumption in transshipment systems. Such tools are essential for assessing the energy demand and intensity of intermodal terminals during the design phase. This gap presents a challenge for intermodal terminal designers, power grid operators, and other stakeholders, particularly in an era of growing energy needs. The authors of this paper identified this issue in the context of a real business case while planning potential intermodal terminal locations along new railway lines. The need became apparent when power grid designers requested energy consumption forecasts for the proposed terminals, highlighting the necessity to formulate and mathematically solve this problem. To address this challenge, a three-stage model was developed based on a pre-designed intermodal terminal. Stage I focused on establishing the fundamental assumptions for intermodal terminal operations. Key parameters influencing energy intensity were identified, such as the size of the transshipment yard, the types of loading operations, the number of containers handled, and the selection of handling equipment. These parameters formed the foundation for further analysis and modeling. Stage II focused on determining the optimal number of machines required to handle a given throughput. This included determining the specific parameters of the equipment, such as speed, span, and efficiency coefficients, as well as ensuring compliance with installation constraints dictated by the terminal layout. Stage III focused on estimating the energy consumption of both individual handling cycles and the total consumption of all handling equipment installed at the terminal. This required obtaining detailed information about the operational parameters of the handling equipment, which directly influence energy consumption. Using these parameters and the equations outlined in Stage III, the energy consumption for a single loading cycle was calculated for each type of handling equipment. Based on the total number of loading operations and model constraints, the total energy consumption of the terminal was estimated for various workload scenarios. In this phase of the study, numerous test calculations were performed. The analysis of testing parameters and the specified terminal layout revealed that energy consumption per cycle varies by equipment type: rail-mounted gantry cranes consume between 5.23 and 8.62 kWh, rubber-tired gantry cranes consume between 3.86 and 7.5 kWh, and automated guided vehicles consume approximately 0.8 kWh per cycle. All handling equipment, based on the adopted assumptions, will consume between 2200 and 13,470 kWh per day. Based on the testing results, a methodology was developed to aid intermodal terminal designers in estimating energy consumption based on variations in input parameters. The results closely align with those reported in the global literature, demonstrating that the methodology proposed in this article provides an accurate approach for estimating energy consumption at intermodal terminals. This method is also suited for use in ex ante cost–benefit analysis. A sensitivity analysis revealed the key variables and parameters that have the greatest impact on unit energy consumption per handling cycle. These included the transshipment yard’s dimensions, the mass of the equipment and cargo, and the nominal specifications of machinery engines. This research is significant for present-day economies heavily reliant on electricity, particularly during the energy transition phase, where efficient management of energy resources and infrastructure is essential. In the case of Poland, where this analysis was conducted, the energy transition involves not only switching handling equipment from combustion to electric power but, more importantly, decarbonizing the energy system. This study is the first to provide a methodology fully based on the design parameters of a planned intermodal terminal, validated with empirical data, enabling the calculation of future energy consumption directly from terminal technical designs. It also fills a critical research gap by enabling ex ante comparisons of energy intensity across transport chains, an area previously constrained by the lack of reliable tools for estimating energy consumption within transshipment terminals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariusz Brzeziński & Dariusz Pyza & Joanna Archutowska & Michał Budzik, 2024. "Method of Estimating Energy Consumption for Intermodal Terminal Loading System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-35, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6409-:d:1547955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michał Kłodawski & Roland Jachimowski & Norbert Chamier-Gliszczyński, 2024. "Analysis of the Overhead Crane Energy Consumption Using Different Container Loading Strategies in Urban Logistics Hubs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Mariusz Brzeziński & Dariusz Pyza, 2023. "A Refined Model for Carbon Footprint Estimation in Electric Railway Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Ghali, Khalifa H. & El-Sakka, M. I. T., 2004. "Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 225-238, March.
    4. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    5. Sari, Ramazan & Ewing, Bradley T. & Soytas, Ugur, 2008. "The relationship between disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in the United States: An ARDL approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2302-2313, September.
    6. Xie, Ying & Song, Dong-Ping, 2018. "Optimal planning for container prestaging, discharging, and loading processes at seaport rail terminals with uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 88-109.
    7. Woxenius, Johan, 2007. "Alternative transport network designs and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 35, pages 27-45.
    8. Meng, Qiang & Wang, Xinchang, 2011. "Intermodal hub-and-spoke network design: Incorporating multiple stakeholders and multi-type containers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 724-742, May.
    9. Rizzoli, Andrea E. & Fornara, Nicoletta & Gambardella, Luca Maria, 2002. "A simulation tool for combined rail/road transport in intermodal terminals," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 57-71.
    10. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    11. Altinay, Galip & Karagol, Erdal, 2004. "Structural break, unit root, and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 985-994, November.
    12. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Vazquez-Paja, Barbara & Gimenez Maldonado, Jose Andrés, 2019. "Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions of port container terminal equipment: Evidence from the Port of Valencia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 312-319.
    13. Rofhiwa Lutendo Edward Takalani & Lesedi Masisi, 2023. "Development of an Optimal Port Crane Trajectory for Reduced Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omri, Anis, 2014. "An international literature survey on energy-economic growth nexus: Evidence from country-specific studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 951-959.
    2. Kumar, Ronald Ravinesh & Kumar, Radika, 2013. "Effects of energy consumption on per worker output: A study of Kenya and South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1187-1193.
    3. Sofien, Tiba & Omri, Anis, 2016. "Literature survey on the relationships between energy variables, environment and economic growth," MPRA Paper 82555, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Sep 2016.
    4. Basallo-Triana, Mario José & Bravo-Bastidas, Juan José & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François & Vidal-Holguín, Carlos Julio, 2023. "Intermodal hub network design with generalized capacity constraints and non-synchronized train–truck operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Amiri, Arshia & Zibaei, Mansour, 2012. "Granger causality between energy use and economic growth in France with using geostatistical models," MPRA Paper 36357, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Md. Shahiduzzaman & Khorshed Alam, 2014. "A reassessment of energy and GDP relationship: the case of Australia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 323-344, April.
    7. Kumar, Ronald Ravinesh & Stauvermann, Peter Josef & Patel, Arvind & Kumar, Radika Devi, 2014. "Exploring the effects of energy consumption on output per worker: A study of Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 575-585.
    8. Rahman, M.S. & Shahari, Farihana & Rahman, Mahfuzur & Noman, Abu Hanifa Md, 2017. "The interdependent relationship between sectoral productivity and disaggregated energy consumption in Malaysia: Markov Switching approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 752-759.
    9. Mehdi Abid & Rafaa Mraihi, 2015. "Energy Consumption and Industrial Production: Evidence from Tunisia at Both Aggregated and Disaggregated Levels," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 1123-1137, December.
    10. Ewing, Bradley T. & Sari, Ramazan & Soytas, Ugur, 2007. "Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial output in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1274-1281, February.
    11. Magazzino, Cosimo & Mele, Marco & Schneider, Nicolas, 2021. "A D2C algorithm on the natural gas consumption and economic growth: Challenges faced by Germany and Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Kanjilal, Kakali & Ghosh, Sajal, 2013. "Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structuralbreaks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 509-515.
    13. Ghosh, Sajal, 2010. "Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 3008-3014, June.
    14. Muhammad, Shahbaz & V G R, Chandran & Pervaiz, Azeem, 2011. "Natural gas consumption and economic growth: cointegration, causality and forecast error variance decomposition tests for Pakistan," MPRA Paper 35103, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Nov 2011.
    15. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Can African countries efficiently build their economies on renewable energy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 161-173.
    16. Özgür Özaydın* & H. Alper Güzel, 2019. "Oil Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey: An ARDL Bounds Test Approach in the Presence of Structural Breaks," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(6), pages 77-85, 06-2019.
    17. Destek, Mehmet Akif, 2016. "Natural gas consumption and economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1007-1015.
    18. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2008. "Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 50-65, January.
    19. Ali Raza Cheema & Attiya Yasmin Javid, 2015. "The Relationship between Disaggregate Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Environment for Asian Developing Economies," PIDE-Working Papers 2015:115, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    20. Gritli, Mohamed Ilyes & Charfi, Fatma Marrakchi, 2023. "The determinants of oil consumption in Tunisia: Fresh evidence from NARDL approach and asymmetric causality test," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6409-:d:1547955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.