IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i3p598-d1327138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Evaluation and Scheme Optimization for Power Transmission and Transformation Projects with the Adoption of Carbon Reduction Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Shuyuan Zhao

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Heng Chen

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Chengyu Jia

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yinan Wang

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Cheng Xin

    (State Grid Economic and Technical Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China)

  • Xue Jiang

    (Economic and Technical Research Institute of State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Co., Shenyang 110015, China)

Abstract

To investigate the economic impact of carbon reduction technology on power transmission and transformation projects, carbon reduction technologies adapted to power transmission and transformation projects were investigated, and the evaluation indicator system for cost-benefit in power transmission and transformation projects was established based on AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and EWM (Entropy Weight Method). Taking 110 kV and 220 kV transmission and transformation projects in a province located in northwest China as an example, a sensitivity analysis was carried out for the weight of each carbon reduction technology. Additionally, based on the evaluation indicator system, eight alternative carbon reduction schemes were proposed, and the net present value and scheme scores were analyzed with TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). The results showed that in the criterion layer of the 110 kV case, the highest proportion of weight is “high-efficiency transformer”, accounting for 34.12%, and in the indicator layer, the highest proportion of weight is “ parasitic losses”, accounting for 12.35%. After conducting error analysis on the 110 kV and 220 kV cases, it was found that the errors were within an acceptable range both in the criterion layer and index layer. Moreover, it is expected to achieve greater economic benefits through lower costs according to Scheme VI, and due to the limitations of carbon reduction technologies and the lack of a relevant policy system, it is difficult to achieve the goal of covering costs with benefits for the eight schemes studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuyuan Zhao & Heng Chen & Chengyu Jia & Yinan Wang & Cheng Xin & Xue Jiang, 2024. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Scheme Optimization for Power Transmission and Transformation Projects with the Adoption of Carbon Reduction Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:598-:d:1327138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/598/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/598/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yaowen & Chen, Zhihua & Wang, Dengjia & Liu, Yanfeng & Zhang, Yaya & Liu, Yanming & Zhao, Yiting & Gao, Meng & Fan, Jianhua, 2023. "Co-optimization of passive building and active solar heating system based on the objective of minimum carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Wu, Zhiyue & Shi, Xin & Fang, Fang & Wen, Gangcheng & Mi, Yunjie, 2023. "Co-optimization of building energy systems with renewable generations combining active and passive energy-saving," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    3. Zare Banadkouki, Mohammad Reza, 2023. "Selection of strategies to improve energy efficiency in industry: A hybrid approach using entropy weight method and fuzzy TOPSIS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yinan Wang & Heng Chen & Shuyuan Zhao & Lanxin Fan & Cheng Xin & Xue Jiang & Fan Yao, 2024. "Benefit Evaluation of Carbon Reduction in Power Transmission and Transformation Projects Based on the Modified TOPSIS-RSR Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Constantinos Vassiliades & Christos Minterides & Olga-Eleni Astara & Giovanni Barone & Ioannis Vardopoulos, 2023. "Socio-Economic Barriers to Adopting Energy-Saving Bioclimatic Strategies in a Mediterranean Sustainable Real Estate Setting: A Quantitative Analysis of Resident Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Liu, Ziyang & He, Mingfei & Tang, Xiaoping & Yuan, Guofeng & Yang, Bin & Yu, Xiaohui & Wang, Zhifeng, 2024. "Capacity optimisation and multi-dimensional analysis of air-source heat pump heating system: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    4. Kong, Mengdi & Ye, Xuemin & Liu, Di & Li, Chunxi, 2024. "Comprehensive evaluation of medical waste gasification low-carbon multi-generation system based on AHP–EWM–GFCE method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    5. Mingming Zhang & Zikun Yang & Ying Lu & Wenwen Song & Fangting Chen, 2024. "Evaluation of Core Competitiveness of New Energy Industry and Analysis of Obstacle Factors Taking Shandong Province as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Xueyi Wang & Taiyi He & Ke Li, 2023. "Regional Population and Public Services under the Framework of Sustainable Development: Evidence from a Typical High-Tech Zone in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Wang, Baichao & Liu, Yanfeng & Wang, Dengjia & Song, Cong & Fu, Zhiguo & Zhang, Cong, 2024. "A review of the photothermal-photovoltaic energy supply system for building in solar energy enrichment zones," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:598-:d:1327138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.