IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p3285-d1117357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Improvement of Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge Applying Iron Oxides-Based Additives

Author

Listed:
  • Regimantas Dauknys

    (Department of Environmental Protection and Water Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Aušra Mažeikienė

    (Department of Environmental Protection and Water Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Iron additives are effective in the anaerobic sewage sludge digestion process, but the composition and dosage of these additives are not precisely defined. This research investigates the effects of three iron oxides-based additives on the destruction of volatile solids, the production and quality of biogas, as well as the quality of the supernatant. Additive No 1 contained >41.5% of FeO and >41.5% of Fe 2 O 3 , additive No 2 contained ≥86% of Fe 3 O 4 , and additive No 3 contained ≥98% of Fe 3 O 4 . The best results were obtained by applying an iron oxides-based additive with a higher content of divalent iron oxide. The increase in efficiency of the VSs destruction was not significant and on average 2.2%. The increase in biogas production was on average 20% while the average increase in the content of methane in the biogas was 6.3%. Applying the additive, the reduction in the concentration of ammonium nitrogen in the supernatant was up to 28%, as well as a reduction in the concentration of phosphate phosphorus in the supernatant by up to 3.1 times could be expected compared to the case when the additive was not applied. The dose of additive No 1 was between 7.5 g/kg of dry solids and 15 g/kg of dry solids in the lab-scale test. The dose was specified in the full-scale test, and the recommended dose of the additive was 10 g/kg of dry solids to improve biogas production.

Suggested Citation

  • Regimantas Dauknys & Aušra Mažeikienė, 2023. "Process Improvement of Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge Applying Iron Oxides-Based Additives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3285-:d:1117357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qin, Yujie & Chen, Linyi & Wang, Tongyu & Ren, Junyi & Cao, Yan & Zhou, Shaoqi, 2019. "Impacts of ferric chloride, ferrous chloride and solid retention time on the methane-producing and physicochemical characterization in high-solids sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1290-1298.
    2. Yang, Ziyi & Wang, Wen & He, Yanfeng & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing, 2018. "Effect of ammonia on methane production, methanogenesis pathway, microbial community and reactor performance under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 915-925.
    3. S. H. Ibrahim & M. Abdulaziz, 2016. "The Effect of Different Zero-Valent Iron Sources on Biogas Production from Waste Sludge Anaerobic Digestion," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(8), pages 59-67, 08-2016.
    4. Alvydas Zagorskis & Regimantas Dauknys & Mantas Pranskevičius & Olha Khliestova, 2023. "Research on Biogas Yield from Macroalgae with Inoculants at Different Organic Loading Rates in a Three-Stage Bioreactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Félix González & Carmen María Álvez-Medina & Sergio Nogales-Delgado, 2023. "Biogas Steam Reforming in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-35, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Le & Loh, Kai-Chee & Lim, Jun Wei & Zhang, Jingxin, 2019. "Bioinformatics analysis of metagenomics data of biogas-producing microbial communities in anaerobic digesters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 110-126.
    2. Saha, Chayan Kumer & Nandi, Rajesh & Akter, Shammi & Hossain, Samira & Kabir, Kazi Bayzid & Kirtania, Kawnish & Islam, Md Tahmid & Guidugli, Laura & Reza, M. Toufiq & Alam, Md Monjurul, 2024. "Technical prospects and challenges of anaerobic co-digestion in Bangladesh: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Vadim Burko & Alvydas Zagorskis & Nelli Elistratova & Olha Khliestova & Jaunius Urbonavičius & Vladimir Monin, 2024. "Assessment of the Seasonal Potential of Macroalgae and Grass in the Sea of Azov for Methanogenesis and Optimization of the Digestate’s Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    5. Xiao, Youqian & Yang, Hongnan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Alleviation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    6. Xiao, Youqian & Yang, Hongnan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Zhao, Cong & Deng, Liangwei, 2021. "Granular activated carbon alleviates the combined stress of ammonia and adverse temperature conditions during dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 451-460.
    7. Qin, Yujie & Chen, Linyi & Wang, Tongyu & Ren, Junyi & Cao, Yan & Zhou, Shaoqi, 2019. "Impacts of ferric chloride, ferrous chloride and solid retention time on the methane-producing and physicochemical characterization in high-solids sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1290-1298.
    8. Andrea Zanellati & Federica Spina & Luca Rollé & Giovanna Cristina Varese & Elio Dinuccio, 2020. "Fungal Pretreatments on Non-Sterile Solid Digestate to Enhance Methane Yield and the Sustainability of Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Yu, Lu & Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen & Shen, Yanwen, 2021. "How does choline change methanogenesis pathway in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Dalke, Rachel & Demro, Delaney & Khalid, Yusra & Wu, Haoran & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem, 2021. "Current status of anaerobic digestion of food waste in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Pohl, Marcel & Sánchez-Sánchez, Maria & Mumme, Jan, 2019. "Anaerobic digestion of wheat straw and rape oil cake in a two-stage solid-state system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 359-367.
    12. Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Liew, Zhen Kang & Chan, Yi Jing & Ho, Zheng Theng & Yip, Yew Hong & Teng, Ming Chern & Ameer Abbas bin, Ameer Illham Tuah & Chong, Siewhui & Show, Pau Loke & Chew, Chien Lye, 2021. "Biogas production enhancement by co-digestion of empty fruit bunch (EFB) with palm oil mill effluent (POME): Performance and kinetic evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 766-777.
    14. M. Devendran Manogaran & Mohd Hakimi & Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad & Rashid Shamsuddin & Jun Wei Lim & Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan & Nurul Tasnim Sahrin, 2023. "Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    15. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Ricci, Marina & Adani, Fabrizio & Dong, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 242-250.
    16. Agostini, Sara & Bucci, Luca & Doni, Davide & Costantini, Paola & Gupte, Ameya & Müller, Bettina & Sibilla, Fabrizio & Basaglia, Marina & Casella, Sergio & Kougias, Panagiotis G. & Campanaro, Stefano , 2024. "Bioaugmentation strategies based on bacterial and methanogenic cultures to relieve stress in anaerobic digestion of protein-rich substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Yang, Ziyi & Sun, Hangyu & Kurbonova, Malikakhon & Zhou, Ling & Arhin, Samuel Gyebi & Papadakis, Vagelis G. & Goula, Maria A. & Liu, Guangqing & Zhang, Yi & Wang, Wen, 2022. "Simultaneous supplementation of magnetite and polyurethane foam carrier can reach a Pareto-optimal point to alleviate ammonia inhibition during anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 104-116.
    18. Sun, Hangyu & Yang, Ziyi & Liu, Guangqing & Zhang, Yi & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Wen, 2023. "Double-edged effect of tar on anaerobic digestion: Equivalent method and modeling investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    19. Pengcheng Liu & Yunxia Pan, 2023. "The Improvement of Rice Straw Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Swine Wastewater by Solar/Fe(II)/PS Pretreatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Xiao, Benyi & Tang, Xinyi & Zhang, Wenzhe & Zhang, Ke & Yang, Tang & Han, Yunping & Liu, Junxin, 2022. "Effects of rice straw ratio on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and rice straw mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3285-:d:1117357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.