IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2563-d1091628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction in CO Emission from Small Reciprocating Engine Operated with Wood Gasifier by Mixture LHV Changing

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroshi Enomoto

    (Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan)

  • Ryo Nakagawa

    (Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan)

Abstract

In order to exchange the wood biomass energy for electric power with small capacity and high efficiency, it is most effective to use a reciprocating engine operated with a wood gasifier. On the other hand, such a small-capacity system is often installed in urban areas. Therefore, strict emission regulation should be observed. Normally, as the low heating value (LHV) of bio-syngas is small, the engine should be operated with a stoichiometric mixture to achieve a maximum power density. However, the emission with a stoichiometric mixture contains much unburned CO. This means that a stoichiometric mixture operation shows low efficiency and can’t observe the regulations. In this report, a mechanism of the unburned CO is considered, and a method to reduce the unburned CO ratio is shown with experimental results. In the experiment, a commercial reciprocating engine (4-stroke, modified single cylinder) is used. The bio-syngas, a producer gas from a fixed bed gasifier, is produced by a self-made wood pellet gasifier (fixed bed, auto thermal down-draft). The bio-syngas flow rate is calculated with the nitrogen ratio between input air and bio-syngas. The LHV is adjusted with the city gas (as an alternative to methane) and hydrogen. The CO volume ratio of the exhaust from the engine is more than 3 v% when the excess air ratio of bio-syngas/air mixture is 1.3, as the LHV of bio-syngas is less than 5.0 MJ/m 3 -LHV. On the other hand, the CO volume ratio of the exhaust under operation of the mixture, the bio-syngas, and methane with more than 7.0 MJ/m 3 -LHV was less than 0.2 v%. The CO in the exhaust with low LHV fuel means that the combustion is not finished in the chamber. The unburned ratio could be predicted in consideration of the gap/clearance as crevice, the temperature boundary layer, and the quenching distance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroshi Enomoto & Ryo Nakagawa, 2023. "Reduction in CO Emission from Small Reciprocating Engine Operated with Wood Gasifier by Mixture LHV Changing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2563-:d:1091628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Uisung & Balu, Elango & Chung, J.N., 2013. "An experimental evaluation of an integrated biomass gasification and power generation system for distributed power applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 699-708.
    2. Kan, Xiang & Zhou, Dezhi & Yang, Wenming & Zhai, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2018. "An investigation on utilization of biogas and syngas produced from biomass waste in premixed spark ignition engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 210-222.
    3. Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel & Bellenoue, Marc & Boust, Bastien & Sotton, Julien, 2014. "Multi-zone modeling and simulation of syngas combustion under laminar conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 724-734.
    4. Enomoto, Hiroshi & Saito, Kazuki, 2020. "Effects of the hydrogen and methane fractions in biosyngas on the stability of a small reciprocated internal combustion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Kim, Young Doo & Yang, Chang Won & Kim, Beom Jong & Kim, Kwang Su & Lee, Jeung Woo & Moon, Ji Hong & Yang, Won & Yu, Tae U & Lee, Uen Do, 2013. "Air-blown gasification of woody biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 414-420.
    6. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira Júnior, Silvio & Burbano, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Supercritical steam cycles and biomass integrated gasification combined cycles for sugarcane mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1172-1180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zongyu Yue & Haifeng Liu, 2023. "Advanced Research on Internal Combustion Engines and Engine Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-8, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    2. González, Arnau & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Puig, Rita & Navarro, Pere, 2015. "Review of micro- and small-scale technologies to produce electricity and heat from Mediterranean forests׳ wood chips," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 143-155.
    3. Jena, Priyaranjan & Tirkey, Jeewan Vachan, 2024. "Power and efficiency improvement of SI engine fueled with boosted producer gas-methane blends and LIVC-miller cycle strategy: Thermodynamic and optimization studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    4. Fiore, M. & Magi, V. & Viggiano, A., 2020. "Internal combustion engines powered by syngas: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Luigi De Simio & Sabato Iannaccone & Massimo Masi & Paolo Gobbato, 2022. "Experimental Study and Optimisation of a Non-Conventional Ignition System for Reciprocating Engines Operation with Hydrogen–Methane Blends, Syngas, and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    7. Rodriguez-Alejandro, David A. & Nam, Hyungseok & Maglinao, Amado L. & Capareda, Sergio C. & Aguilera-Alvarado, Alberto F., 2016. "Development of a modified equilibrium model for biomass pilot-scale fluidized bed gasifier performance predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1092-1108.
    8. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Król, Danuta & Poskrobko, Sławomir, 2016. "High-methane gasification of fuels from waste – Experimental identification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 592-600.
    10. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    11. Carlos Vargas-Salgado & Elías Hurtado-Pérez & David Alfonso-Solar & Anders Malmquist, 2021. "Empirical Design, Construction, and Experimental Test of a Small-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Dias, Marina O.S. & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Filho, Rubens Maciel & Rossell, Carlos E.V., 2011. "Improving bioethanol production from sugarcane: evaluation of distillation, thermal integration and cogeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3691-3703.
    13. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Polygeneration using agricultural waste: Thermodynamic and economic feasibility study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 648-660.
    14. Copa Rey, José Ramón & Tamayo Pacheco, Jorge Jadid & António da Cruz Tarelho, Luís & Silva, Valter & Cardoso, João Sousa & Silveira, José Luz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo, 2021. "Evaluation of cogeneration alternative systems integrating biomass gasification applied to a Brazilian sugar industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 318-333.
    15. Dias, Marina O.S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Jesus, Charles D.F. & Rossell, Carlos E.V. & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Bonomi, Antonio, 2012. "Improving second generation ethanol production through optimization of first generation production process from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 246-252.
    16. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Velásquez, H.I. & De Oliveira, S. & Benjumea, P. & Pellegrini, L.F., 2013. "Exergo-environmental evaluation of liquid biofuel production processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 97-103.
    18. Abubackar, Haris Nalakath & Bengelsdorf, Frank R. & Dürre, Peter & Veiga, María C. & Kennes, Christian, 2016. "Improved operating strategy for continuous fermentation of carbon monoxide to fuel-ethanol by clostridia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 210-217.
    19. Díaz Pérez, Álvaro A. & Escobar Palacio, José C. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Martínez Reyes, Arnaldo M. & Rúa Orozco, Dimas J. & Silva Lora, Electo E. & Almazán del Olmo, Oscar A., 2018. "Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of reheat and regeneration alternatives in cogeneration systems of the Brazilian sugarcane and alcohol sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 247-262.
    20. Darzi, Mahdi & Johnson, Derek & Ulishney, Chris & Clark, Nigel, 2018. "Low pressure direct injection strategies effect on a small SI natural gas two-stroke engine’s energy distribution and emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1585-1602.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2563-:d:1091628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.