IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i15p5844-d1212236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Manure and Sewage Sludge

Author

Listed:
  • Tariq Alkhrissat

    (Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan)

  • Ghada Kassab

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Mu’tasim Abdel-Jaber

    (Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan
    Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

Abstract

Supplementation with iron oxide nanoparticles has been suggested as a potential method for improving energy generation through anaerobic digestion, specifically by enhancing the rate of methane production. This investigation examined the effects of iron oxide (Fe 3 O 4 ) nanoparticles (NPs) on anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure (CM) and sewage sludge (SS) through batch testing conducted under mesophilic conditions (35 °C) using a RESPIROMETRIC Sensor System 6 Maxi—BMP (RSS-BMP). The use of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles at doses of 40, 80, 120, and 160 mg/L (batches M1, M2, M3, and M5) was studied. The use of 160 mg/L Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles in combination with mixtures of different ratios (M4, M5, and M6) was further investigated. The findings indicate that the addition of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles at a concentration of 40 mg/L to anaerobic batches did not significantly impact the hydrolysis process and subsequent methane production. Exposing the samples to Fe 3 O 4 NPs at concentrations of 80, 120, and 160 mg/L resulted in a similar positive effect, as evidenced by hydrolysis percentages of approximately 94%, compared to 60% for the control (C2). Furthermore, methane production also increased. The use of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles at a concentration of 160 mg/L resulted in biodegradability of 97.3%, compared to 51.4% for the control incubation (C2). Moreover, the findings demonstrate that supplementing anaerobic batches with 160 mg/L Fe 3 O 4 NPs at varying mixture ratios (M4, M5, and M6) had a significant impact on both hydrolysis and methane production. Specifically, hydrolysis percentages of 94.24, 98.74, and 96.78% were achieved for M4, M5, and M6, respectively, whereas the percentages for the control incubation (C1, C2, and C3) were only 56.78, 60.21, and 58.74%. Additionally, the use of 160 mg/L Fe 3 O 4 NPs in mixtures M4, M5, and M6 resulted in biodegradability percentages of 78.4, 97.3, and 88.3%, respectively. In contrast, for the control incubation (C1, C2, and C3) biodegradability was only 44.24, 51.4, and 49.1%.

Suggested Citation

  • Tariq Alkhrissat & Ghada Kassab & Mu’tasim Abdel-Jaber, 2023. "Impact of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Manure and Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5844-:d:1212236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Zengshuai & Guo, Liang & Wang, Yi & Zhao, Yangguo & She, Zonglian & Gao, Mengchun & Guo, Yiding, 2020. "Application of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles during the two-stage anaerobic digestion with waste sludge: Impact on the biogas production and the substrate metabolism," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2724-2735.
    2. Montingelli, M.E. & Benyounis, K.Y. & Quilty, B. & Stokes, J. & Olabi, A.G., 2017. "Influence of mechanical pretreatment and organic concentration of Irish brown seaweed for methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1079-1089.
    3. Shah, Fayyaz Ali & Mahmood, Qaisar & Rashid, Naim & Pervez, Arshid & Raja, Iftikhar Ahmad & Shah, Mohammad Maroof, 2015. "Co-digestion, pretreatment and digester design for enhanced methanogenesis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 627-642.
    4. Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Abdel-Hadi, M.A. & Hassan, H.E. & Badr, Y., 2017. "Influence of zero valent iron nanoparticles and magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 842-853.
    5. Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Abdel-Hadi, M.A. & Hassan, H.E. & Badr, Y., 2016. "Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 592-598.
    6. Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Cui, Shaofeng & Yu, Qiong & Ma, Ruijie, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures with corn stover or apple pulp for enhanced biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 335-342.
    7. Al-Hamamre, Zayed & Saidan, Motasem & Hararah, Muhanned & Rawajfeh, Khaled & Alkhasawneh, Hussam E. & Al-Shannag, Mohammad, 2017. "Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 295-314.
    8. Zamir Sánchez & Davide Poggio & Liliana Castro & Humberto Escalante, 2021. "Simultaneous Synergy in CH 4 Yield and Kinetics: Criteria for Selecting the Best Mixtures during Co-Digestion of Wastewater and Manure from a Bovine Slaughterhouse," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers & Dagmara Piłyp, 2024. "Stimulating Methane Production from Poultry Manure Digest with Sewage Sludge and Organic Waste by Thermal Pretreatment and Adding Iron or Sodium Hydroxide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cerrillo, Míriam & Burgos, Laura & Ruiz, Beatriz & Barrena, Raquel & Moral-Vico, Javier & Font, Xavier & Sánchez, Antoni & Bonmatí, August, 2021. "In-situ methane enrichment in continuous anaerobic digestion of pig slurry by zero-valent iron nanoparticles addition under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 372-382.
    2. Hijazi, O. & Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Amer, B.M.A. & Amer, M.A. & Badr, M. & Bernhardt, H., 2020. "Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 417-424.
    3. Aguilar-Moreno, Guadalupe Stefanny & Navarro-Cerón, Elizabeth & Velázquez-Hernández, Azucena & Hernández-Eugenio, Guadalupe & Aguilar-Méndez, Miguel Ángel & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro, 2020. "Enhancing methane yield of chicken litter in anaerobic digestion using magnetite nanoparticles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 204-213.
    4. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    5. Bahare Salehi & Lijun Wang, 2022. "Critical Review on Nanomaterials for Enhancing Bioconversion and Bioremediation of Agricultural Wastes and Wastewater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Ghofrani-Isfahani, Parisa & Baniamerian, Hamed & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Kasama, Takeshi & Shahrokhi, Mohammad & Vossoughi, Manouchehr & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Effect of metal oxide based TiO2 nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion process of lignocellulosic substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Gómez Camacho, Carlos E. & Romano, Francesco I. & Ruggeri, Bernardo, 2018. "Macro approach analysis of dark biohydrogen production in the presence of zero valent powered Fe°," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 525-533.
    8. Iliana Dompara & Angeliki Maragkaki & Nikolaos Papastefanakis & Christina Floraki & Dimitra Vernardou & Thrassyvoulos Manios, 2023. "Effects of Different Materials on Biogas Production during Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Kumar, Vikas & Nabaterega, Resty & Khoei, Shiva & Eskicioglu, Cigdem, 2021. "Insight into interactions between syntrophic bacteria and archaea in anaerobic digestion amended with conductive materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Bipasyana Dhungana & Sunil Prasad Lohani & Michael Marsolek, 2022. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Zhao, Bo & Zheng, Pengfei & Yang, Yuyi & Sha, Hao & Cao, Shengxian & Wang, Gong & Zhang, Yanhui, 2022. "Enhanced anaerobic digestion under medium temperature conditions: Augmentation effect of magnetic field and composites formed by titanium dioxide on the foamed nickel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    12. M. Samer & O. Hijazi & E. M. Abdelsalam & A. El-Hussein & Y. A. Attia & I. H. Yacoub & H. Bernhardt, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of using laser treatment and nanomaterials to produce biogas through anaerobic digestion of slurry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14683-14696, October.
    13. Noonari, A.A. & Mahar, R.B. & Sahito, A.R. & Brohi, K.M., 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of canola straw and banana plant wastes with buffalo dung: Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on methane yield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1046-1054.
    14. Esfilar, Reza & Bagheri, Mehdi & Golestani, Behrooz, 2021. "Technoeconomic feasibility review of hybrid waste to energy system in the campus: A case study for the University of Victoria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Abdel-Hadi, M.A. & Hassan, H.E. & Badr, Y., 2018. "Influence of laser irradiation on rumen fluid for biogas production from dairy manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 404-415.
    16. Jae Hoon Jeung & Woo Jin Chung & Soon Woong Chang, 2019. "Evaluation of Anaerobic Co-Digestion to Enhance the Efficiency of Livestock Manure Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Rouches, E. & Herpoël-Gimbert, I. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrere, H., 2016. "Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-198.
    18. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    19. Liu, Ruo-Ying & Lan, Hai-Na & Liu, Zhi-Hua & Li, Bing-Zhi & Yuan, Ying-Jin, 2024. "Microbial valorization of lignin toward coumarins: Challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5844-:d:1212236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.