IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i6p2296-d776208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Meet the Green Deal Objectives—Is It Possible to Obtain 100% RES at the Regional Level in the EU?

Author

Listed:
  • Bartłomiej Igliński

    (Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 11, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Michał Bernard Pietrzak

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Urszula Kiełkowska

    (Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 11, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Mateusz Skrzatek

    (Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 11, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Artur Gajdos

    (Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, POW 3/5, 90-255 Łódź, Poland)

  • Anas Zyadin

    (Faculty of Science and Forestry, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 801014 Joensuu, Finland)

  • Karthikeyan Natarajan

    (Faculty of Science and Forestry, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 801014 Joensuu, Finland)

Abstract

The subject matter discussed in the article concerns the problem of the energy transformation of the European Union (EU) countries. In the case of the EU, the energy transformation has specific characteristics due to formal legal and institutional provisions. This means that the member states are obliged to implement the adopted Community Energy Strategy, which was defined under the European Green Deal. According to the EU policy, all member states are to have climate-neutral and zero-gas-emission economies by 2050. The energy transformation is to be largely based on the diversification of the energy sources used, with a dominance of renewable energy sources (RES). The article presents a research problem, where the question was asked whether achieving climate-neutral energy independence based solely on RES is possible at the regional level. It seems that the positive answer is an important argument in the discussion about the possibility of all member states achieving the goals set under the European Green Deal. Additionally, stating the possibility of energy independence from RES for a selected region is an important argument to promote just and bottom-up initiatives in order to carry out the energy transformation more effectively. The assessment of the energy potential from renewable sources at the regional level was carried out on the example of a selected NUTS 2 region, the Greater Poland Voivodeship in Poland. The main objective of the study is to analyze the possibility of obtaining independence from RES by the selected Greater Poland Voivodeship. The implementation of the objective consists of determining the energy potential from RES in the Voivodeship under study on the basis of the methods of a geographic information system (GIS). GIS methods were selected due to the fact that they allow for the spatial positioning of point, line, and surface structures in relation to the potential of RES, thus ensuring high accuracy of the obtained estimates. The analysis carried out in the study shows that the technical potential of RES in the Greater Poland Voivodeship is higher than the current electricity and heat usage. This means that by focusing solely on RES in the region, the Greater Poland Voivodeship can fully meet the energy demand thanks to its green resources. It should be emphasized that the Greater Poland Voivodeship is one of the coal-dependent regions in Poland that has already prepared a structured plan of just transformation. A locally and bottom-up prepared strategy assumes the conversion of the region from a “Coal Energy Region” into a “Green Energy Valley” in which economic development will be strictly connected to RES energy independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartłomiej Igliński & Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Urszula Kiełkowska & Mateusz Skrzatek & Artur Gajdos & Anas Zyadin & Karthikeyan Natarajan, 2022. "How to Meet the Green Deal Objectives—Is It Possible to Obtain 100% RES at the Regional Level in the EU?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2296-:d:776208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rees, William E., 2006. "Globalization, trade and migration: Undermining sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 220-225, September.
    2. Ewelina Kochanek, 2021. "Evaluation of Energy Transition Scenarios in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Marlena Piekut, 2021. "The Consumption of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) by the European Union Households between 2004 and 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Paroussos, Leonidas, 2018. "Employment creation in EU related to renewables expansion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 935-945.
    5. Martin David & Sophia Schönborn, 2018. "Bottom-Up Energy Transition Narratives: Linking the Global with the Local? A Comparison of Three German Renewable Co-Ops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Belke, Ansgar & Dobnik, Frauke & Dreger, Christian, 2011. "Energy consumption and economic growth: New insights into the cointegration relationship," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 782-789, September.
    7. Elzbieta Roszko-Wojtowicz & Maria M. Grzelak, 2020. "Macroeconomic stability and the level of competitiveness in EU member states: a comparative dynamic approach," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(4), pages 657-688, December.
    8. Jahangiri, Mehdi & Ghaderi, Reza & Haghani, Ahmad & Nematollahi, Omid, 2016. "Finding the best locations for establishment of solar-wind power stations in Middle-East using GIS: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 38-52.
    9. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Kujawski, Wojciech & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2012. "Geoenergy in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2545-2557.
    10. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Bartłomiej Igliński & Wojciech Kujawski & Paweł Iwański, 2021. "Energy Transition in Poland—Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Michał Barnard Pietrzak & Adam P. Balcerzak & Artur Gajdos & Łukasz Arendt, 2017. "Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: the case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(2), pages 190-203, December.
    12. Grzegorz Piechota & Bartłomiej Igliński, 2021. "Biomethane in Poland—Current Status, Potential, Perspective and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    13. Iglinski, Bartlomiej & Kujawski, Wojciech & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin, 2010. "Renewable energy in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship (Poland)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 1336-1341, May.
    14. Egidijus Kasiulis & Petras Punys & Algis Kvaraciejus & Antanas Dumbrauskas & Linas Jurevičius, 2020. "Small Hydropower in the Baltic States—Current Status and Potential for Future Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Adam Kałążny & Wojciech Morawski, 2021. "Taxation of Assets Used to Generate Energy—In the Context of the Transformation of the Polish Energy Sector from Coal Energy to Low-Emission Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, Angelika & Szczepaniak, Krzysztof & Cheba, Katarzyna & Gajda, Waldemar & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2018. "Innovation in sustainable development: an investigation of the EU context using 2030 agenda indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 251-262.
    17. Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco & Taher, Myriam & Zapata-Sierra, Antonio & Juaidi, Adel & Montoya, Francisco G., 2017. "An overview of research and energy evolution for small hydropower in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 476-489.
    18. Sánchez-Lozano, Juan M. & Teruel-Solano, Jerónimo & Soto-Elvira, Pedro L. & Socorro García-Cascales, M., 2013. "Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 544-556.
    19. Sliz-Szkliniarz, Beata & Vogt, Joachim, 2011. "GIS-based approach for the evaluation of wind energy potential: A case study for the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1696-1707, April.
    20. Pao, Hsiao-Tien & Fu, Hsin-Chia, 2013. "Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 381-392.
    21. Małgorzata Rataj & Justyna Berniak-Woźny & Marlena Plebańska, 2021. "Poland as the EU Leader in Terms of Photovoltaic Market Growth Dynamics—Behind the Scenes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    22. Upham, Paul & Shackley, Simon, 2006. "The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for governance of renewable energy planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 2161-2172, October.
    23. Akito Ozawa & Yuki Kudoh, 2021. "Assessing Uncertainties of Life-Cycle CO 2 Emissions Using Hydrogen Energy for Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    24. Viktor Prokop & Michaela Kotkova Striteska & Jan Stejskal, 2021. "Fostering Czech firms’ innovation performance through efficient cooperation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(3), pages 671-700, September.
    25. Rogers, J.C. & Simmons, E.A. & Convery, I. & Weatherall, A., 2008. "Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4217-4226, November.
    26. Wiesław Musiał & Monika Zioło & Lidia Luty & Kamila Musiał, 2021. "Energy Policy of European Union Member States in the Context of Renewable Energy Sources Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    27. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech & Plaskacz, Marta, 2013. "Renewable energy production in the Zachodniopomorskie Voivodeship (Poland)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 768-777.
    28. Mu-Xing Lin & Hwa Meei Liou & Kuei Tien Chou, 2020. "National Energy Transition Framework toward SDG7 with Legal Reforms and Policy Bundles: The Case of Taiwan and Its Comparison with Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    29. Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky, 2020. "The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 569-577, August.
    30. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech, 2012. "Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4890-4900.
    31. Marinko Skare & Malgorzata Porada-Rochon, 2019. "Financial and economic development link in transitional economies: a spectral Granger causality analysis 1991–2017," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 7-35, March.
    32. Zoellner, Jan & Schweizer-Ries, Petra & Wemheuer, Christin, 2008. "Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4136-4141, November.
    33. Renata Gnatowska & Elżbieta Moryń-Kucharczyk, 2021. "The Place of Photovoltaics in Poland’s Energy Mix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    34. Anna Zadykowicz & Krzysztof J. Chmielewski & Dariusz Siemieniako, 2020. "Proactive customer orientation and joint learning capabilities in collaborative machine to machine innovation technology development: the case study of automotive equipment manufacturer," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(3), pages 531-547, September.
    35. Serenella Caravella & Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "Mission-Oriented Policies and Technological Sovereignty: The Case of Climate Mitigation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    36. Tomáš Meluzín & Marek Zinecker & Adam P. Balcerzak & Michał B. Pietrzak, 2018. "Why Do Companies Stay Private? Determinants for IPO Candidates to Consider in Poland and the Czech Republic," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 471-503, November.
    37. Jana Chovancova & Juraj Tej, 2020. "Decoupling economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions: the case of the energy sector in V4 countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(2), pages 235-251, June.
    38. Lucia Svabova & Eva Nahalkova Tesarova & Marek Durica & Lenka Strakova, 2021. "Evaluation of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of the unemployment rate in Slovakia: counterfactual before-after comparison," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 261-284, June.
    39. Malte Oehlmann & Jürgen Meyerhoff, 2017. "Stated preferences towards renewable energy alternatives in Germany – do the consequentiality of the survey and trust in institutions matter?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, January.
    40. Ćosić, Boris & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2012. "A 100% renewable energy system in the year 2050: The case of Macedonia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 80-87.
    41. Teegala Srinivasa Kishore & Epari Ritesh Patro & V. S. K. V. Harish & Ali Torabi Haghighi, 2021. "A Comprehensive Study on the Recent Progress and Trends in Development of Small Hydropower Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-31, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Enrico Maria Carlini & Corrado Gadaleta & Michela Migliori & Francesca Ferretti & Riccardo Vailati & Andrea Venturini & Cinzia Puglisi, 2024. "Cost-Effective Target Capacity Assessment in the Energy Transition: The Italian Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Daniel Icaza & David Vallejo-Ramirez & Carlos Guerrero Granda & Edwin Marín, 2024. "Challenges, Roadmaps and Smart Energy Transition towards 100% Renewable Energy Markets in American Islands: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Bartłomiej Igliński & Michał Bernard Pietrzak, 2022. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Mariusz Starzec, 2023. "Experimental Development of the Horizontal Drain Water Heat Recovery Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Paweł Kut & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Patryk Kurek, 2024. "Comprehensive Analysis of Failures in Photovoltaic Installations—A Survey-Based Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-39, November.
    6. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Marta Kuc-Czarnecka, 2022. "Transformation of Energy Markets: Description, Modeling of Functioning Mechanisms and Determining Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-6, July.
    7. Santanu Kumar Dash & Suprava Chakraborty & Michele Roccotelli & Umesh Kumar Sahu, 2022. "Hydrogen Fuel for Future Mobility: Challenges and Future Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Paul Calanter, 2023. "Assessing the Energy State of the EU under Green Deal Objectives," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 11(1), pages 16-23, May.
    9. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Pietrzak, Michał Bernard & Kiełkowska, Urszula & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2022. "The assessment of renewable energy in Poland on the background of the world renewable energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    10. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Edward Urbańczyk, 2022. "RES Market Development and Public Awareness of the Economic and Environmental Dimension of the Energy Transformation in Poland and Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Bartłomiej Iglinski & Karol Flisikowski & Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Urszula Kiełkowska & Mateusz Skrzatek & Anas Zyadin & Karthikeyan Natarajan, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Pomerania Voivodeship—Institutional, Economic, Environmental and Physical Aspects in Light of EU Energy Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Bartłomiej Igliński & Michał Bernard Pietrzak, 2022. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Anna Manowska & Anna Bluszcz, 2022. "Forecasting Crude Oil Consumption in Poland Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Elżbieta Bukalska & Marek Zinecker & Michał Bernard Pietrzak, 2021. "Socioemotional Wealth (SEW) of Family Firms and CEO Behavioral Biases in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Robert Huterski & Agnieszka Huterska & Ewa Zdunek-Rosa & Grażyna Voss, 2021. "Evaluation of the Level of Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Magdalena Majchrzak & Piotr Szczypa & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Supply of Wood Biomass in Poland in Terms of Extraordinary Threat and Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Bartłomiej Igliński & Wojciech Kujawski & Paweł Iwański, 2021. "Energy Transition in Poland—Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Marta Kuc-Czarnecka, 2022. "Transformation of Energy Markets: Description, Modeling of Functioning Mechanisms and Determining Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-6, July.
    10. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Hydropower in the Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States in the Light of the Challenges of Sustainable Development-An Overview of the Current State and Development Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Marlena Piekut, 2021. "Between Poverty and Energy Satisfaction in Polish Households Run by People Aged 60 and Older," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    12. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Pietrzak, Michał Bernard & Kiełkowska, Urszula & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2022. "The assessment of renewable energy in Poland on the background of the world renewable energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    13. Monika Klemke-Pitek & Magdalena Majchrzak, 2022. "Pro-Ecological Activities and Shaping the Competitive Advantage of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Aspect of Sustainable Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    14. B. Igliński & M. Skrzatek & W. Kujawski & M. Cichosz & R. Buczkowski, 2022. "SWOT analysis of renewable energy sector in Mazowieckie Voivodeship (Poland): current progress, prospects and policy implications," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 77-111, January.
    15. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Koziński, Grzegorz & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Buczkowski, Roman, 2016. "Wind energy in Poland – History, current state, surveys, Renewable Energy Sources Act, SWOT analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 19-33.
    16. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Hubert Gąsiński & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Dariusz Soboń & Sebastian Zupok, 2023. "Review of Selected Aspects of Wind Energy Market Development in Poland and Lithuania in the Face of Current Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Agnieszka Mazurek-Czarnecka & Ksymena Rosiek & Marcin Salamaga & Krzysztof Wąsowicz & Renata Żaba-Nieroda, 2022. "Study on Support Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Sources in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-38, June.
    18. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Kujawski, Wojciech & Buczkowski, Roman, 2016. "Renewable energy production in the Łódzkie Voivodeship. The PEST analysis of the RES in the voivodeship and in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 737-750.
    19. Robert Sidełko, 2021. "Application of Technological Processes to Create a Unitary Model for Energy Recovery from Municipal Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Negrete, Moira & Fuentes, Marcelo & Kraslawski, Andrzej & Irarrazaval, Felipe & Herrera-León, Sebastián, 2024. "Socio-environmental implications of the decarbonization of copper and lithium mining and mineral processing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2296-:d:776208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.