IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i11p1745-d116957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Methods for Forecasting Shale Gas Supply in China Based on Economic Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqian Guo

    (MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, China Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China
    Research Center for Strategy of Global Mineral Resources, Institute of Mineral Resources, China Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Qiang Yan

    (MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, China Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China
    Research Center for Strategy of Global Mineral Resources, Institute of Mineral Resources, China Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Anjian Wang

    (Research Center for Strategy of Global Mineral Resources, Institute of Mineral Resources, China Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China)

Abstract

Shale gas, with its lower carbon content and pollution potential, is the most promising natural gas resource in China. When modeling the shale gas supply in a specific gas field, it is of paramount importance to determine the gas supply under economic considerations. Two common calculation methods are used in China for this purpose: Method 1 (M1) is the breakeven analysis, where the gas supply is based on the relationship between costs and revenues, while Method 2 (M2) is the Geologic Resource Supply-Demand Model, where the supply relies on demand and price scenarios. No comparisons has been made between these two methods. In this study, the Fuling shale gas field in the Sichuan Basin was chosen as a study case to forecast the shale gas supply using these two different methods. A sensitivity analysis was performed to discuss the influencing factors of each method and error measures were used to compare the different shale gas supply values calculated by each method. The results shows that M1 is more sensitive to initial production, while M2 is more sensitive to gas price. In addition, M2 is more feasible for its simplicity and accuracy at high price scenarios and M1 is considered to be reliable for low price scenarios with profit. This study can provide a quick and comprehensive assessment method for the shale gas supply in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqian Guo & Qiang Yan & Anjian Wang, 2017. "Assessment of Methods for Forecasting Shale Gas Supply in China Based on Economic Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1745-:d:116957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haitao Guo & Yongsheng Wang & Zhongmin Wang, 2016. "Shale Development and China," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Yongsheng Wang & William E. Hefley (ed.), The Global Impact of Unconventional Shale Gas Development, pages 131-147, Springer.
    2. Wang, Ting & Lin, Boqiang, 2014. "China's natural gas consumption and subsidies—From a sector perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 541-551.
    3. Zhang, Qi & Li, Zhan & Wang, Ge & Li, Hailong, 2016. "Study on the impacts of natural gas supply cost on gas flow and infrastructure deployment in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1385-1398.
    4. Wang, Ke & Feng, Lianyong & Wang, Jianliang & Xiong, Yi & Tverberg, Gail E., 2016. "An oil production forecast for China considering economic limits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 586-596.
    5. Wang, Jianliang & Mohr, Steve & Feng, Lianyong & Liu, Huihui & Tverberg, Gail E., 2016. "Analysis of resource potential for China’s unconventional gas and forecast for its long-term production growth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 389-401.
    6. Ward, James D. & Mohr, Steve H. & Myers, Baden R. & Nel, Willem P., 2012. "High estimates of supply constrained emissions scenarios for long-term climate risk assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 598-604.
    7. Jorge Chebeir & Aryan Geraili & Jose Romagnoli, 2017. "Development of Shale Gas Supply Chain Network under Market Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, February.
    8. Kaiser, Mark J., 2012. "Profitability assessment of Haynesville shale gas wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 315-330.
    9. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Xia, Liangyu & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "Policy recommendations to promote shale gas development in China based on a technical and economic evaluation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 194-206.
    10. Shaikh, Faheemullah & Ji, Qiang & Shaikh, Pervez Hameed & Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain & Uqaili, Muhammad Aslam, 2017. "Forecasting China’s natural gas demand based on optimised nonlinear grey models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 941-951.
    11. Mohr, S.H. & Evans, G.M., 2011. "Long term forecasting of natural gas production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5550-5560, September.
    12. Wang, Jianzhou & Jiang, Haiyan & Zhou, Qingping & Wu, Jie & Qin, Shanshan, 2016. "China’s natural gas production and consumption analysis based on the multicycle Hubbert model and rolling Grey model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1149-1167.
    13. Yuan, Jiehui & Luo, Dongkun & Feng, Lianyong, 2015. "A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niu, Wente & Lu, Jialiang & Sun, Yuping & Zhang, Xiaowei & Li, Qiaojing & Cao, Xu & Liang, Pingping & Zhan, Hongming, 2024. "Techno-economic integration evaluation in shale gas development based on ensemble learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    2. Dong, Kangyin & Sun, Renjin & Wu, Jin & Hochman, Gal, 2018. "The growth and development of natural gas supply chains: The case of China and the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 64-71.
    3. Shangfeng Han & Baosheng Zhang & Xiaoyang Sun & Song Han & Mikael Höök, 2017. "China’s Energy Transition in the Power and Transport Sectors from a Substitution Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Fan, Lurong & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Authority–enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for carbon reduction and energy utilization in the coalbed methane industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Zhou, Junping & Tian, Shifeng & Zhou, Lei & Xian, Xuefu & Yang, Kang & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhang, Chengpeng & Guo, Yaowen, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Chen, Yizhong & Li, Jing & Lu, Hongwei & Yang, Yiyang, 2020. "Impact of unconventional natural gas development on regional water resources and market supply in China from the perspective of game analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Semenychev, V.K. & Kurkin, E.I. & Semenychev, E.V. & Danilova, A.A., 2017. "Multimodel forecasting of non-renewable resources production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 448-460.
    8. Ravnik, J. & Hriberšek, M., 2019. "A method for natural gas forecasting and preliminary allocation based on unique standard natural gas consumption profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 149-162.
    9. Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Pan, Yu & Wang, Hai, 2017. "Multiple energy complementation based on distributed energy systems – Case study of Chongming county, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 329-336.
    10. Wang, Jianliang & Liu, Mingming & McLellan, Benjamin C. & Tang, Xu & Feng, Lianyong, 2017. "Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: A hybrid life cycle analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 38-45.
    11. Qiao, Weibiao & Liu, Wei & Liu, Enbin, 2021. "A combination model based on wavelet transform for predicting the difference between monthly natural gas production and consumption of U.S," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Lu, Hongfang & Ma, Xin & Azimi, Mohammadamin, 2020. "US natural gas consumption prediction using an improved kernel-based nonlinear extension of the Arps decline model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    13. Wang, Yan & Zhong, Dong-Liang & Li, Zheng & Li, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Application of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide semi-clathrate hydrate for CO2 capture from unconventional natural gases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Calderón, Andrés J. & Guerra, Omar J. & Papageorgiou, Lazaros G. & Reklaitis, Gintaras V., 2018. "Disclosing water-energy-economics nexus in shale gas development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 710-731.
    15. Yan, Zhaojin & Yang, Guanghao & He, Rong & Yang, Hui & Ci, Hui, 2023. "“Ship-port-country” multi-dimensional research on the fine analysis of China's LNG trade," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Feijoo, Felipe & Iyer, Gokul C. & Avraam, Charalampos & Siddiqui, Sauleh A. & Clarke, Leon E. & Sankaranarayanan, Sriram & Binsted, Matthew T. & Patel, Pralit L. & Prates, Nathalia C. & Torres-Alfaro,, 2018. "The future of natural gas infrastructure development in the United states," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 149-166.
    17. Liu, Jianye & Li, Zuxin & Duan, Xuqiang & Luo, Dongkun & Zhao, Xu & Liu, Ruolei, 2021. "Subsidy analysis and development trend forecast of China's unconventional natural gas under the new unconventional gas subsidy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Hao Chen & Ling He & Jiachuan Chen & Bo Yuan & Teng Huang & Qi Cui, 2019. "Impacts of Clean Energy Substitution for Polluting Fossil-Fuels in Terminal Energy Consumption on the Economy and Environment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-29, November.
    19. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    20. Xie, Minghua & Wei, Xiaonan & Chen, Chuanglian & Sun, Chuanwang, 2022. "China's natural gas production peak and energy return on investment (EROI): From the perspective of energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1745-:d:116957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.