IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7790-d948991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for CO 2 Conversion—An Overview of the Most Relevant Experimental Results and Kinetic Models

Author

Listed:
  • Vera Marcantonio

    (Unit of Process Engineering, Department of Engineering, University “Campus Bio-Medico” di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy)

  • Marcello De Falco

    (Unit of Process Engineering, Department of Engineering, University “Campus Bio-Medico” di Roma, Via Álvaro Del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy)

  • Enrico Bocci

    (Department of Engineering Science, Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Global warming, along with increasing global energy demands, has led to the need for a sustainable and low-carbon-based energy economy. In addition to renewable energy technologies, such as biomass, solar, hydro, and wind, another possible strategy to mitigate climate change is the capture/conversion and recycling of CO 2 . In recent years, many methods for both CO 2 capture (mainly adsorption, absorption, and membrane) and conversion (many electrolysis, catalyst, and plasma) have been investigated. Conversion technology is less studied but seems to be very promising. Within that, non-thermal plasma technology has received much interest because it works at low temperatures and atmospheric pressure, and there is no need for high temperature and high electricity consumption, which are typical of the catalyst and electrolysis conversion processes, respectively. Therefore, in order to optimize this emerging technology, simulative kinetic models have been developed with the aim of maximizing both energy efficiency and CO 2 conversion. In the present paper, an overview of the most common non-thermal plasma technologies was carried out to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Then, an overview of the most significant kinetic models available in literature was carried out to point out the main reactions occurring during CO 2 conversion and also the parameters that most affect the performance of a plasma reactor during CO 2 conversion. Then, a brief recap of the literature available on economic studies of the plasma process is given.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera Marcantonio & Marcello De Falco & Enrico Bocci, 2022. "Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for CO 2 Conversion—An Overview of the Most Relevant Experimental Results and Kinetic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7790-:d:948991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana-Maria Cormos & Simion Dragan & Letitia Petrescu & Vlad Sandu & Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2020. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Evaluations of Decarbonized Fossil-Intensive Industrial Processes by Reactive Absorption & Adsorption CO 2 Capture Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Ryuji Kawamoto & Hideo Mochizuki & Yoshihisa Moriguchi & Takahiro Nakano & Masayuki Motohashi & Yuji Sakai & Atsushi Inaba, 2019. "Estimation of CO 2 Emissions of Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle and Battery Electric Vehicle Using LCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Raúl Mateos & Ana Sotres & Raúl M. Alonso & Antonio Morán & Adrián Escapa, 2019. "Enhanced CO 2 Conversion to Acetate through Microbial Electrosynthesis (MES) by Continuous Headspace Gas Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Dinca, Cristian & Slavu, Nela & Cormoş, Călin-Cristian & Badea, Adrian, 2018. "CO2 capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 925-936.
    5. Farihahusnah Hussin & Mohamed Kheireddine Aroua & Mohd Azlan Kassim & Umi Fazara Md. Ali, 2021. "Transforming Plastic Waste into Porous Carbon for Capturing Carbon Dioxide: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Marta G. Plaza & Sergio Martínez & Fernando Rubiera, 2020. "CO 2 Capture, Use, and Storage in the Cement Industry: State of the Art and Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Najmus S. Sifat & Yousef Haseli, 2019. "A Critical Review of CO 2 Capture Technologies and Prospects for Clean Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    8. Mario Sisinni & Andrea Di Carlo & Enrico Bocci & Andrea Micangeli & Vincenzo Naso, 2013. "Hydrogen-Rich Gas Production by Sorption Enhanced Steam Reforming of Woodgas Containing TAR over a Commercial Ni Catalyst and Calcined Dolomite as CO 2 Sorbent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Parvez, Ashak Mahmud & Hafner, Selina & Hornberger, Matthias & Schmid, Max & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2021. "Sorption enhanced gasification (SEG) of biomass for tailored syngas production with in-situ CO2 capture: Current status, process scale-up experiences and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Małgorzata Sieradzka & Ningbo Gao & Cui Quan & Agata Mlonka-Mędrala & Aneta Magdziarz, 2020. "Biomass Thermochemical Conversion via Pyrolysis with Integrated CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Abrar Inayat & Murni M. Ahmad & Suzana Yusup & Mohamed Ibrahim Abdul Mutalib, 2010. "Biomass Steam Gasification with In-Situ CO2 Capture for Enriched Hydrogen Gas Production: A Reaction Kinetics Modelling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Paweł Madejski & Karolina Chmiel & Navaneethan Subramanian & Tomasz Kuś, 2022. "Methods and Techniques for CO 2 Capture: Review of Potential Solutions and Applications in Modern Energy Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & De, Sudipta & Assadi, Mohsen & Breuhaus, Peter, 2012. "An EU initiative for future generation of IGCC power plants using hydrogen-rich syngas: Simulation results for the baseline configuration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 280-290.
    14. Nguyen Van Duc Long & Jintae Lee & Kee-Kahb Koo & Patricia Luis & Moonyong Lee, 2017. "Recent Progress and Novel Applications in Enzymatic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Asim Anwar & Mustafa Younis & Inayat Ullah, 2020. "Impact of Urbanization and Economic Growth on CO 2 Emission: A Case of Far East Asian Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-8, April.
    16. Li, Ziwei & Lin, Qian & Li, Min & Cao, Jianxin & Liu, Fei & Pan, Hongyan & Wang, Zhigang & Kawi, Sibudjing, 2020. "Recent advances in process and catalyst for CO2 reforming of methane," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. George, Adwek & Shen, Boxiong & Craven, Michael & Wang, Yaolin & Kang, Dongrui & Wu, Chunfei & Tu, Xin, 2021. "A Review of Non-Thermal Plasma Technology: A novel solution for CO2 conversion and utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elhambakhsh, Abbas & Van Duc Long, Nguyen & Lamichhane, Pradeep & Hessel, Volker, 2023. "Recent progress and future directions in plasma-assisted biomass conversion to hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    2. Subramanian, Navaneethan & Madejski, Paweł, 2023. "Analysis of CO2 capture process from flue-gases in combined cycle gas turbine power plant using post-combustion capture technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Aubaid Ullah & Nur Awanis Hashim & Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Mohd Usman Mohd Junaidi, 2023. "A Review on Methanol as a Clean Energy Carrier: Roles of Zeolite in Improving Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    4. Vincenzo Palma & Concetta Ruocco & Eugenio Meloni & Antonio Ricca, 2017. "Influence of Catalytic Formulation and Operative Conditions on Coke Deposition over CeO 2 -SiO 2 Based Catalysts for Ethanol Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Chakrabortty, Sankha & Kumar, Ramesh & Nayak, Jayato & Jeon, Byong-Hun & Dargar, Shashi Kant & Tripathy, Suraj K. & Pal, Parimal & Ha, Geon-Soo & Kim, Kwang Ho & Jasiński, Michał, 2023. "Green synthesis of MeOH derivatives through in situ catalytic transformations of captured CO2 in a membrane integrated photo-microreactor system: A state-of-art review for carbon capture and utilizati," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Gao, Ningbo & Śliz, Maciej & Quan, Cui & Bieniek, Artur & Magdziarz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass CO2 gasification with CaO looping for syngas production in a fixed-bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 652-661.
    7. Martin Greco-Coppi & Carina Hofmann & Diethelm Walter & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2023. "Negative CO2 emissions in the lime production using an indirectly heated carbonate looping process," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Orlando Corigliano & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2022. "On the Technology of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Energy Systems for Stationary Power Generation: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-73, November.
    9. Paweł Ziółkowski & Paweł Madejski & Milad Amiri & Tomasz Kuś & Kamil Stasiak & Navaneethan Subramanian & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Janusz Badur & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Dariusz Mikielewicz, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Negative CO 2 Emission Power Plant Using Aspen Plus, Aspen Hysys, and Ebsilon Software," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    11. Wenxiao Chu & Maria Vicidomini & Francesco Calise & Neven Duić & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Qiuwang Wang & Maria da Graça Carvalho, 2022. "Recent Advances in Low-Carbon and Sustainable, Efficient Technology: Strategies and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    13. Xi Liu & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Revolutionizing Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Technologies in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    15. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Małgorzata Sieradzka & Cezary Kirczuk & Izabela Kalemba-Rec & Agata Mlonka-Mędrala & Aneta Magdziarz, 2022. "Pyrolysis of Biomass Wastes into Carbon Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Abudureheman, Maliyamu & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Cong, 2022. "Spatial effects of dynamic comprehensive energy efficiency on CO2 reduction in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Shi, Xuhang & Li, Chunzhe & Yang, Zhenning & Xu, Jie & Song, Jintao & Wang, Fuqiang & Shuai, Yong & Zhang, Wenjing, 2024. "Egg-tray-inspired concave foam structure on pore-scale space radiation regulation for enhancing photo-thermal-chemical synergistic conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    19. Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Usman, Muhammad & Chukwuma Onwe, Joshua, 2023. "Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Vyacheslav V. Rodaev & Svetlana S. Razlivalova, 2020. "The Zr-Doped CaO CO 2 Sorbent Fabricated by Wet High-Energy Milling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-7, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7790-:d:948991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.