IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7493-d939572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interaction between a Cyclically Heated Building and the Ground, for Selected Locations in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Nawalany

    (Department of Rural Building, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Paweł Sokołowski

    (Department of Rural Building, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to verify the impact of the location of a cyclically heated building on its energy needs and interaction with the environment. The model building was a large-scale broiler house located in southern Poland. In the examined facility, year-round measurements of selected parameters of the internal and external microclimate were carried out. The tests also covered the temperature of the soil in three measurement columns. The obtained measurement results were used for further computer analyses. A geometric model of the building was made and a calculation model specification was introduced, supported by specialized software for the physics of WUFI ® plus structures. The numerical analysis included validation. The validation results were assessed on the basis of the Coefficient of Determination method (R2) and the Goodness of Fit (GOF) method. Due to the lack of normality of the data distribution, a Rang-Spearman correlation analysis was carried out, which showed a very strong data correlation (0.94). The analysis of the R2 coefficient of determination confirmed the high reliability of the model (83%). In the case of the GOF method, a compliance value of 87% was obtained. Differentiated locations were adopted for further analysis, while maintaining the structure of the examined building in reality. Six European locations were selected: Kraków (Poland), Málaga (Spain), Brest (France), Visby (Sweden), Umea (Sweden), and Kiruna (Sweden). The analysis included three variants, in which the length of the technological break was adopted accordingly. A technological break between production cycles was assumed, the three variants of which lasted 3, 7, and 14 days. The analysis of the obtained results showed that the external microclimate significantly determines the energy interaction between the building and the ground. The length of the technological break is very important in a climate dominated by low temperatures (Northern Scandinavia). The south-western part of Europe allows the technological break to be extended without significant differences for heating purposes. The length of the technological break in the range of 3 to 14 days does not significantly affect the intensity of heat exchange with the ground on a yearly basis, regardless of the location of the building. There were differences of no more than 2% between the technological break lasting 3 days and the 14-day break.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Nawalany & Paweł Sokołowski, 2022. "Interaction between a Cyclically Heated Building and the Ground, for Selected Locations in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7493-:d:939572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grzegorz Nawalany & Jana Lendelova & Paweł Sokołowski & Miroslav Zitnak, 2021. "Numerical Analysis of the Impact of the Location of a Commercial Broiler House on Its Energy Management and Heat Exchange with the Ground," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Germán Ramos Ruiz & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2017. "Validation of Calibrated Energy Models: Common Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Akkurt, G.G. & Aste, N. & Borderon, J. & Buda, A. & Calzolari, M. & Chung, D. & Costanzo, V. & Del Pero, C. & Evola, G. & Huerto-Cardenas, H.E. & Leonforte, F. & Lo Faro, A. & Lucchi, E. & Marletta, L, 2020. "Dynamic thermal and hygrometric simulation of historical buildings: Critical factors and possible solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Grzegorz Nawalany & Paweł Sokołowski, 2020. "Improved Energy Management in an Intermittently Heated Building Using a Large Broiler House in Central Europe as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Philip Thornton & Pierre Gerber, 2010. "Climate change and the growth of the livestock sector in developing countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 169-184, February.
    6. James Bambara & Andreas K. Athienitis, 2018. "Energy and Economic Analysis for Greenhouse Ground Insulation Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Grzegorz Nawalany & Paweł Sokołowski, 2021. "Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Ground Dampness on Heat Transfer between Greenhouse and Ground," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Sokołowski & Grzegorz Nawalany & Małgorzata Michalik, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of Flooring Material and Construction Solutions on Heat Exchange with the Ground in a Historic Wooden Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Paweł Sokołowski & Grzegorz Nawalany & Tomasz Jakubowski & Ernest Popardowski & Vasyl Lopushniak & Atilgan Atilgan, 2022. "Numerical Analysis of Thermal Impact between the Cooling Facility and the Ground," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Paweł Sokołowski & Grzegorz Nawalany, 2020. "Analysis of Energy Exchange with the Ground in a Two-Chamber Vegetable Cold Store, Assuming Different Lengths of Technological Break, with the Use of a Numerical Calculation Method—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Al-Awsh, Waleed A. & Qasem, Naef A.A. & Al-Amoudi, Omar S. Baghabra & Al-Osta, Mohammed A., 2020. "Experimental and numerical investigation on innovative masonry walls for industrial and residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Žižak, Tej & Domjan, Suzana & Medved, Sašo & Arkar, Ciril, 2022. "Efficiency and sustainability assessment of evaporative cooling of photovoltaics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Martín Pensado-Mariño & Lara Febrero-Garrido & Pablo Eguía-Oller & Enrique Granada-Álvarez, 2021. "Feasibility of Different Weather Data Sources Applied to Building Indoor Temperature Estimation Using LSTM Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Abdelhakim Mesloub & Aritra Ghosh & Mabrouk Touahmia & Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy & Emad Noaime & Badr M. Alsolami, 2020. "Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic Integrated Shading Devices (PVSDs) and Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic (STPV) Devices Retrofitted to a Prototype Office Building in a Hot Desert Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Kittisak Lohwanitchai & Daranee Jareemit, 2021. "Modeling Energy Efficiency Performance and Cost-Benefit Analysis Achieving Net-Zero Energy Building Design: Case Studies of Three Representative Offices in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Agnieszka Leśniak & Monika Górka & Izabela Skrzypczak, 2021. "Barriers to BIM Implementation in Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Projects—The Polish Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Gigih Rahmandhani Setyantho & Hansaem Park & Seongju Chang, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment for Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Windows in Different Climate Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal, 2021. "Impact of climate change on pastoralists’ resilience and sustainable mitigation in Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11406-11426, August.
    12. Tomasz Szul & Krzysztof Nęcka & Stanisław Lis, 2021. "Application of the Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Modeling to Forecast Energy Efficiency in Real Buildings Undergoing Thermal Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Suzana Domjan & Sašo Medved & Boštjan Černe & Ciril Arkar, 2019. "Fast Modelling of nZEB Metrics of Office Buildings Built with Advanced Glass and BIPV Facade Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Amin, Amin & Mourshed, Monjur, 2024. "Community stochastic domestic electricity forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    15. Ana Ogando-Martínez & Javier López-Gómez & Lara Febrero-Garrido, 2018. "Maintenance Factor Identification in Outdoor Lighting Installations Using Simulation and Optimization Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Theodosiou, Theodoros & Tsikaloudaki, Katerina & Kontoleon, Karolos & Giarma, Christina, 2021. "Assessing the accuracy of predictive thermal bridge heat flow methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. James Allen & Ari Halberstadt & John Powers & Nael H. El-Farra, 2020. "An Optimization-Based Supervisory Control and Coordination Approach for Solar-Load Balancing in Building Energy Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-28, July.
    18. Shamsi, Mohammad Haris & Ali, Usman & Mangina, Eleni & O’Donnell, James, 2021. "Feature assessment frameworks to evaluate reduced-order grey-box building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    19. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak & Tomasz Szul, 2022. "Application of a Model Based on Rough Set Theory (RST) to Estimate the Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    20. Yue Yang & Kai Hu & Yibiao Liu & Zhihuang Wang & Kaihong Dong & Peijuan Lv & Xing Shi, 2023. "Optimisation of Building Green Performances Using Vertical Greening Systems: A Case Study in Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7493-:d:939572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.