IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6604-d911107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underground Gas Storage Facilities in Ukraine: Current State and Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Iwaszczuk

    (Faculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicz Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Ivanna Zapukhliak

    (Department of Management and Administration, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Karpatska Str. 15, 76019 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

  • Aleksander Iwaszczuk

    (College of Social Sciences, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska Str. 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Oleh Dzoba

    (Department of Entrepreneurship and Marketing, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Karpatska Str. 15, 76019 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandra Romashko

    (Department of Finance, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Karpatska Str. 15, 76019 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article considers the system of underground gas storage in Ukraine, the history of its development, the characteristics of regional gas storage complexes, and the current state and role of the gas group enterprises in the domestic gas market. The study also proves the significant role of Ukrainian UGS facilities in ensuring the energy security of Europe. However, their position in the European gas market depends significantly not only on the demand for gas storage services from foreign companies but also on the awareness at the state level of the importance of collective energy security manifested in energy policy regulations. To process forecasts for the development of the European gas market, an assessment of the environment of the gas storage operator of Ukraine was carried out using PESTEL and SWOT analysis. As a result, pessimistic, realistic, and optimistic scenarios for using underground gas storage facilities in Ukraine have been formed.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Iwaszczuk & Ivanna Zapukhliak & Aleksander Iwaszczuk & Oleh Dzoba & Oleksandra Romashko, 2022. "Underground Gas Storage Facilities in Ukraine: Current State and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-34, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6604-:d:911107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Yusin, 2017. "Interdependence, issue importance, and the 2009 Russia-Ukraine gas conflict," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 199-209.
    2. Alberini, Anna & Khymych, Olha & Ščasný, Milan, 2020. "Responsiveness to energy price changes when salience is high: Residential natural gas demand in Ukraine," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Teichmann, Fabian & Falker, Marie-Christin & Sergi, Bruno S., 2020. "Extractive industries, corruption and potential solutions. The case of Ukraine," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Olexandr Yemelyanov & Anastasiya Symak & Tetyana Petrushka & Olena Zahoretska & Myroslava Kusiy & Roman Lesyk & Lilia Lesyk, 2019. "Changes in Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Aspirations for Energy Independence: Sectoral Analysis of Uses of Natural Gas in Ukrainian Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-34, December.
    5. Sauvageot, Eric Pardo, 2020. "Between Russia as producer and Ukraine as a transit country: EU dilemma of interdependence and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Goncharuk, Anatoliy G. & Storto, Corrado lo, 2017. "Challenges and policy implications of gas reform in Italy and Ukraine: Evidence from a benchmarking analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 456-466.
    7. Syed, Zaki & Lawryshyn, Yuri, 2020. "Risk analysis of an underground gas storage facility using a physics-based system performance model and Monte Carlo simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Yu, Weichao & Gong, Jing & Song, Shangfei & Huang, Weihe & Li, Yichen & Zhang, Jie & Hong, Bingyuan & Zhang, Ye & Wen, Kai & Duan, Xu, 2019. "Gas supply reliability analysis of a natural gas pipeline system considering the effects of underground gas storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Almeida, José Ricardo Uchoa Cavalcanti & Fagundes De Almeida, Edmar Luiz & Torres, Ednildo Andrade & Freires, Francisco Gaudencio Mendonça, 2018. "Economic value of underground natural gas storage for the Brazilian power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 488-497.
    10. Chen, Siyuan & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Ge & Zhu, Lijing & Li, Yan, 2018. "Investment strategy for underground gas storage facilities based on real option model considering gas market reform in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 132-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuangqing Chen & Ze Yu & Yuchun Li & Zhihua Wang & Minglin Si, 2024. "Optimization of a Typical Gas Injection Pressurization Process in Underground Gas Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filip Božić & Daria Karasalihović Sedlar & Ivan Smajla & Ivana Ivančić, 2021. "Analysis of Changes in Natural Gas Physical Flows for Europe via Ukraine in 2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Xiao, Ludi & Zhou, Peng & Bai, Yang & Zhang, Kai, 2024. "Modeling the dynamic allocation problem of multi-service storage system with strategy learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    3. Veronika Oravcová & Kateryna Yakovenko & Matúš Mišík, 2022. "Complete but Fragmented: Research on Energy in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    4. He, Youwei & Wang, Ning & Tang, Yong & Tang, Liangrui & He, Zhiyue & Rui, Zhenhua, 2024. "Formation-water evaporation and salt precipitation mechanism in porous media under movable water conditions in underground gas storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    5. Devine, Mel T. & Russo, Marianna, 2019. "Liquefied natural gas and gas storage valuation: Lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1389-1406.
    6. Gkousis, Spiros & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Harcouët-Menou, Virginie & Pogacnik, Justin & Laenen, Ben & Compernolle, Tine, 2024. "Integrated geo-techno-economic and real options analysis of the decision to invest in a medium enthalpy deep geothermal heating plant. A case study in Northern Belgium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Mihai Daniel Roman & Diana Mihaela Stanculescu, 2021. "An Analysis of Countries’ Bargaining Power Derived from the Natural Gas Transportation System Using a Cooperative Game Theory Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Alberini, Anna & Bezhanishvili, Levan & Ščasný, Milan, 2022. "“Wild” tariff schemes: Evidence from the Republic of Georgia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Yu, Weichao & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Kai & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Hongfei & Wang, Kun & Gong, Jing & Qu, Chunxu, 2021. "Subset simulation-based reliability analysis of the corroding natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Dimitrios Dimitriou & Panagiotis Zeimpekis, 2022. "Appraisal Modeling for FSRU Greenfield Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Xuejie Li & Yuan Xue & Yuxing Li & Qingshan Feng, 2022. "An Optimization Method for a Compressor Standby Scheme Based on Reliability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Kuznetsov, G.V. & Syrodoy, S.V. & Purin, M.V. & Karelin, V.A. & Nigay, N.A. & Yankovsky, S.A. & Isaev, S.A., 2024. "Analysis of the possibility of solid-phase ignition of coal fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    13. Wen, Kai & Lu, Yangfan & Lu, Meitong & Zhang, Wenwei & Zhu, Ming & Qiao, Dan & Meng, Fanpeng & Zhang, Jing & Gong, Jing & Hong, Bingyuan, 2022. "Multi-period optimal infrastructure planning of natural gas pipeline network system integrating flowrate allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    14. Gökçe, Osman Zeki & Hatipoglu, Emre & Belaïd, Fateh, 2024. "Navigating energy diplomacy in times of recovery and conflict: A study of cross-border energy trade dynamics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2023. "Environmental impact assessment of green ammonia-powered very large tanker ship for decarbonized future shipping operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Ping Shi & Bo Yan & Jun Zhao, 2020. "Appropriate timing for SMEs to introduce an Internet-based online channel under uncertain operating costs: a real options analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 969-999, December.
    18. Wang, Qi & Miao, Cairan & Tang, Yi, 2022. "Power shortage support strategies considering unified gas-thermal inertia in an integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    19. Senderov, Sergey M. & Vorobev, Sergey V. & Smirnova, Elena M., 2022. "Peak underground gas storage efficiency in reducing the vulnerability of gas supply to consumers in an extensive gas transmission system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Capece, Guendalina & Costa, Roberta & Di Pillo, Francesca, 2021. "Benchmarking the efficiency of natural gas distribution utilities in Italy considering size, ownership, and maturity," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6604-:d:911107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.