IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8902-d1498562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of a Typical Gas Injection Pressurization Process in Underground Gas Storage

Author

Listed:
  • Shuangqing Chen

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163000, China
    Daqing Oilfield Design Institute Co., Ltd., China National Petroleum Corporation, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Ze Yu

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Yuchun Li

    (Daqing Oilfield Design Institute Co., Ltd., China National Petroleum Corporation, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Zhihua Wang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Minglin Si

    (Construction Project Management Sub-Company, China Oil & Gas Pipeline Network Corporation, Langfang 065000, China)

Abstract

In the early construction of an underground gas storage facility in an oil and gas field in southwest China, the increasing gas injection volume led to a continuous rise in energy consumption, which affects the economic sustainability of gas injection and extraction. In order to improve efficiency and reduce energy consumption, optimization of the pressurization process was carried out. An optimization model for the process of pressurization in underground gas storage has been established. Based on the model, a joint optimization approach is applied, where MATLAB is responsible for the iterative process of finding the optimal parameter combinations and HYSYS is responsible for the establishment of the process and calculation of the results of the process parameters. The key parameters include the outlet parameters of the compressor and the air cooler, which are critical in determining the overall energy consumption and operational performance of the system. Accordingly, the results related to the optimal parameter combinations for two-stage compression and three-stage compression were obtained in the case study. Compared with one-stage compression, two-stage and three-stage compression can diminish energy consumption by 1,464,789 kJ/h and 2,177,319 kJ/h, respectively. The reduced rate of energy consumption of three-stage compression was 16.10%, which was higher than that of two-stage compression by 10.83%. Although the construction costs of three-stage compression were higher than those of two-stage compression, from the perspective of long-term operation, three-stage compression had lower operating costs and superior economy and applicable value. The research results provided scientific references and new ideas for the optimization and adjustment of the pressurization process in underground gas storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuangqing Chen & Ze Yu & Yuchun Li & Zhihua Wang & Minglin Si, 2024. "Optimization of a Typical Gas Injection Pressurization Process in Underground Gas Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8902-:d:1498562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Iwaszczuk & Ivanna Zapukhliak & Aleksander Iwaszczuk & Oleh Dzoba & Oleksandra Romashko, 2022. "Underground Gas Storage Facilities in Ukraine: Current State and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-34, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8902-:d:1498562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.