IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v121y2018icp488-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic value of underground natural gas storage for the Brazilian power sector

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, José Ricardo Uchoa Cavalcanti
  • Fagundes De Almeida, Edmar Luiz
  • Torres, Ednildo Andrade
  • Freires, Francisco Gaudencio Mendonça

Abstract

This paper aims at assessing the main obstacles to the development of underground natural gas storage (UGS) in Brazil and at identifying the conditions required for the feasibility of UGS projects in the country. The paper estimates the economic value of UGS facilities for the power sector in Brazil, considering the specificities of the Brazilian power and gas sectors. It is shown that the Brazilian gas demand does not have a seasonal characteristic; instead, the demand is volatile of a random nature associated with the demand from thermal power plants, which are complementary to hydropower generation. This paper has proved that there is an important economic value associated with the storage of gas in periods of low power prices and its consumption in period of high power prices. Finally, this paper argues that it is essential to seek mechanisms to include the economic value of UGS for the power sector into the UGS regulation and market design, as well as to explore the possibility of making gas storage a resource for the power sector operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, José Ricardo Uchoa Cavalcanti & Fagundes De Almeida, Edmar Luiz & Torres, Ednildo Andrade & Freires, Francisco Gaudencio Mendonça, 2018. "Economic value of underground natural gas storage for the Brazilian power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 488-497.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:488-497
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421518304518
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ejarque, João Miguel, 2011. "Evaluating the economic cost of natural gas strategic storage restrictions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 44-55, January.
    2. Cavaliere, Alberto & Giust, Valentina & Maggi, Mario, 2013. "Efficient mechanisms for access to storage when competition in gas markets is imperfect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 481-490.
    3. Budny, Christoph & Madlener, Reinhard & Hilgers, Christoph, 2013. "Economic Feasibility of Pipeline and Underground Reservoir Storage Options for Power-to-Gas Load Balancing," FCN Working Papers 18/2013, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Devine, Mel T. & Russo, Marianna, 2019. "Liquefied natural gas and gas storage valuation: Lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1389-1406.
    2. Xiao, Ludi & Zhou, Peng & Bai, Yang & Zhang, Kai, 2024. "Modeling the dynamic allocation problem of multi-service storage system with strategy learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    3. Natalia Iwaszczuk & Ivanna Zapukhliak & Aleksander Iwaszczuk & Oleh Dzoba & Oleksandra Romashko, 2022. "Underground Gas Storage Facilities in Ukraine: Current State and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-34, September.
    4. Larissa de Oliveira Resende & Davi Valladão & Bernardo Vieira Bezerra & Yasmin Monteiro Cyrillo, 2021. "Assessing the value of natural gas underground storage in the Brazilian system via stochastic dual dynamic programming," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 106-124, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baranes, Edmond & Mirabel, François & Poudou, Jean-Christophe, 2014. "Access to natural gas storage facilities: Strategic and regulation issues," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 19-32.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5384 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Masoud Agabalaye-Rahvar & Amin Mansour-Saatloo & Mohammad Amin Mirzaei & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Kazem Zare & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam, 2020. "Robust Optimal Operation Strategy for a Hybrid Energy System Based on Gas-Fired Unit, Power-to-Gas Facility and Wind Power in Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Abrell, Jan & Chavaz, Léo & Weigt, Hannes, 2019. "Dealing with Supply Disruptions on the European Natural Gas Market: Infrastructure Investments or Coordinated Policies?," Working papers 2019/11, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    5. Tsani Fauziah Rakhmah & Yanfei Li, 2016. "A Review on Institutional Framework, Principles, and Key Elements for Integrated Electricity Market: Implications for ASEAN," Working Papers DP-2016-26, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    6. Devine, Mel T. & Russo, Marianna, 2019. "Liquefied natural gas and gas storage valuation: Lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1389-1406.
    7. Anna Creti & Bertrand Villeneuve, 2013. "Commodity storage with durable shocks : A simple Markovian model," Post-Print hal-01517436, HAL.
    8. Xiaomin Xu & Chenhao Li, 2024. "Impact of Natural Gas Peak Shaving on High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Keisaku Higashida & Yasuhiro Takarada, 2012. "Does the Acquisition of Mines Benefit Resource-Importing Countries?," Discussion Paper Series 86, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Mar 2012.
    10. Zhihua Chen & Hui Wang & Tongxia Li & Ieongcheng Si, 2021. "Demand for Storage and Import of Natural Gas in China until 2060: Simulation with a Dynamic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Cavaliere, Alberto & Giust, Valentina & Maggi, Mario, 2013. "Efficient mechanisms for access to storage when competition in gas markets is imperfect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 481-490.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:488-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.