IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i11p3956-d825509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Flexible Generation Mode on the Stability of Hydropower Generation System: Stability Assessment of Part-Load Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Gongcheng Liu

    (Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agriculture Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Xudi Qiu

    (Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Jiayi Ma

    (Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Diyi Chen

    (Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agriculture Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Xiao Liang

    (Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agriculture Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China)

Abstract

Utilizing the flexibility of hydropower to integrate more intermittent renewable energy into the power grid requires hydro units to expand the operating range; this duty, however, requires a continuous improvement of their stability during part-load conditions. This study focuses on the stability performance of hydropower generation systems (HGS) during flexible operation. First, a dynamic model of HGS that reflects the characteristics of part-load conditions is established by introducing pressure pulsation in the draft tube. Second, the model of HGS is coupled with a shafting system to investigate the vibration property of the unit. Then, the validity of the coupling model is verified by comparing it with a traditional model and actual data. Finally, some possible ways to mitigate the instability caused by part-load operation are explored. The results show that part-load operation of the system is accompanied by significant dynamic response fluctuations (5%). Moreover, the interaction effect of multiple vibration sources and the vibration performance in a part-load condition are investigated. This paper is expected to provide support for improving the stability of HGS part-load operation and offer useful insights for exploiting the flexibility potential of HGS.

Suggested Citation

  • Gongcheng Liu & Xudi Qiu & Jiayi Ma & Diyi Chen & Xiao Liang, 2022. "Influence of Flexible Generation Mode on the Stability of Hydropower Generation System: Stability Assessment of Part-Load Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3956-:d:825509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riasi, Alireza & Tazraei, Pedram, 2017. "Numerical analysis of the hydraulic transient response in the presence of surge tanks and relief valves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-146.
    2. Lai, Xinjie & Li, Chaoshun & Zhou, Jianzhong & Zhang, Yongchuan & Li, Yonggang, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization strategy for the optimal control scheme of pumped hydropower systems under successive load rejections," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Zhang, Hao & Guo, Pengcheng & Sun, Longgang, 2020. "Transient analysis of a multi-unit pumped storage system during load rejection process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 34-43.
    4. Hirth, Lion, 2016. "The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 210-223.
    5. Yu, An & Zou, Zhipeng & Zhou, Daqing & Zheng, Yuan & Luo, Xianwu, 2020. "Investigation of the correlation mechanism between cavitation rope behavior and pressure fluctuations in a hydraulic turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1199-1208.
    6. Jonsson, P.P. & Mulu, B.G. & Cervantes, M.J., 2012. "Experimental investigation of a Kaplan draft tube – Part II: Off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 71-83.
    7. Muhirwa, Alexis & Li, Biao & Su, Wen-Tao & Liu, Quan-Zhong & Binama, Maxime & Wu, Jian & Cai, Wei-Hua, 2020. "Investigation on mutual traveling influences between the draft tube and upstream components of a Francis turbine unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 973-992.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaokun Man & Hongyan Song & Huanhuan Li, 2023. "Estimating Hydropower Generation Flexibilities of a Hybrid Hydro–Wind Power System: From the Perspective of Multi-Time Scales," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lan, Xinyao & Jin, Jiahui & Xu, Beibei & Chen, Diyi & Egusquiza, Mònica & Kim, Jin-Hyuk & Egusquiza, Eduard & Jafar, Nejadali & Xu, Lin & Kuang, Yuan, 2022. "Physical model test and parametric optimization of a hydroelectric generating system with a coaxial shaft surge tank," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 880-899.
    2. Lei, Liuwei & Li, Feng & Kheav, Kimleng & Jiang, Wei & Luo, Xingqi & Patelli, Edoardo & Xu, Beibei & Chen, Diyi, 2021. "A start-up optimization strategy of a hydroelectric generating system: From a symmetrical structure to asymmetric structure on diversion pipes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1148-1165.
    3. Cui, Zilong & Guo, Wencheng, 2023. "Multi-objective control of transient process of hydropower plant with two turbines sharing one penstock under combined operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1275-1288.
    4. Kruyt, Bert & Lehning, Michael & Kahl, Annelen, 2017. "Potential contributions of wind power to a stable and highly renewable Swiss power supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Quentin Perrier, 2017. "The French Nuclear Bet," Working Papers 2017.18, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Klie, Leo & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Optimal configuration and diversification of wind turbines: A hybrid approach to improve the penetration of wind power," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Mikovits, Christian & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wehrle, Sebastian & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2021. "Stronger together: Multi-annual variability of hydrogen production supported by wind power in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    8. Wei Huang & Jiming Ma & Xinlei Guo & Huokun Li & Jiazhen Li & Gang Wang, 2021. "Stability Criterion for Mass Oscillation in the Surge Tank of a Hydropower Station Considering Velocity Head and Throttle Loss," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Lai, Xi-De & Liang, Quan-Wei & Ye, Dao-Xing & Chen, Xiao-Ming & Xia, Mi-Mi, 2019. "Experimental investigation of flows inside draft tube of a high-head pump-turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 731-742.
    10. Zhao, Ziwen & Yuan, Yichen & He, Mengjiao & Jurasz, Jakub & Wang, Jianan & Egusquiza, Mònica & Egusquiza, Eduard & Xu, Beibei & Chen, Diyi, 2022. "Stability and efficiency performance of pumped hydro energy storage system for higher flexibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1482-1494.
    11. Li, Yanxue & Zhang, Xiaoyi & Gao, Weijun & Xu, Wenya & Wang, Zixuan, 2022. "Operational performance and grid-support assessment of distributed flexibility practices among residential prosumers under high PV penetration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    12. He, Xianghui & Yang, Jiandong & Yang, Jiebin & Zhao, Zhigao & Hu, Jinhong & Peng, Tao, 2023. "Evolution mechanism of water column separation in pump turbine: Model experiment and occurrence criterion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Ruhnau, Oliver & Hirth, Lion & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2020. "Heating with wind: Economics of heat pumps and variable renewables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Su, Yufei & Kern, Jordan D. & Characklis, Gregory W., 2017. "The impact of wind power growth and hydrological uncertainty on financial losses from oversupply events in hydropower-dominated systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 172-183.
    15. Ramírez-Sagner, Gonzalo & Muñoz, Francisco D., 2019. "The effect of head-sensitive hydropower approximations on investments and operations in planning models for policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 38-47.
    16. He, Shaokun & Guo, Shenglian & Yin, Jiabo & Liao, Zhen & Li, He & Liu, Zhangjun, 2022. "A novel impoundment framework for a mega reservoir system in the upper Yangtze River basin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    17. Trivedi, Chirag & Cervantes, Michel J., 2017. "Fluid-structure interactions in Francis turbines: A perspective review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 87-101.
    18. Munoz, Francisco D. & Pumarino, Bruno J. & Salas, Ignacio A., 2017. "Aiming low and achieving it: A long-term analysis of a renewable policy in Chile," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 304-314.
    19. Hyun, Minwoo & Kim, Yeong Jae & Eom, Jiyong, 2020. "Assessing the impact of a demand-resource bidding market on an electricity generation portfolio and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Vesterberg, Mattias & Böök, Herman & Lindfors, Anders V. & Svento, Rauli, 2018. "Real-time pricing revisited: Demand flexibility in the presence of micro-generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 642-658.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3956-:d:825509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.