IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2518-d544784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Perspectives of Using Non-Pelleted vs. Pelleted Corn Stover in a Cellulosic Biorefinery

Author

Listed:
  • Nurun Nahar

    (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

  • Ramsharan Pandey

    (Department of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

  • Ghasideh Pourhashem

    (Department of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

  • David Ripplinger

    (Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

  • Scott W. Pryor

    (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
    College of Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

Abstract

Cellulosic biorefineries have attracted interest due to the growing energy security and environmental concerns related to fossil fuel-based energy and chemicals. Using pelleted biomass as a biorefinery feedstock can reduce their processing inputs while improving biomass handling and transportation. However, it is still questionable whether energy and emission savings from feedstock transportation and processing can justify pelletization. A life cycle assessment approach was used to compare energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pelleted and non-pelleted corn stover as a biorefinery feedstock. Operations considered were pelleting, transportation, and soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA) pretreatment. Despite greater GHG emissions (up to 25 times higher than the transportation) generated from the pelleting process, the model showed a significant opportunity to offset and even reduce overall GHG emissions considering the pretreatment process benefits. Our process energy analysis showed that SAA pretreatment of pelleted biomass required significantly lower energy inputs (56%) due to the lower-severity pretreatment’s effectiveness. Higher pretreatment solid loadings are allowed when pelleted biomass is used and this reduces the process chemicals and water requirements by 56% and 49%, respectively. This study demonstrated that the SAA pretreatment of pelleted biomass might be a feasible option as the cellulosic biorefinery feedstock.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurun Nahar & Ramsharan Pandey & Ghasideh Pourhashem & David Ripplinger & Scott W. Pryor, 2021. "Life Cycle Perspectives of Using Non-Pelleted vs. Pelleted Corn Stover in a Cellulosic Biorefinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2518-:d:544784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2518/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2518/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perlack, R.D. & Turhollow, A.F., 2003. "Feedstock cost analysis of corn stover residues for further processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 1395-1403.
    2. Nazira Mahmud & Kurt A. Rosentrater, 2019. "Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Pretreatment and Product Separation Technologies for Butanol Bioprocessing from Oil Palm Frond," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José A. Ventura, 2023. "Climate Benefits Advocated by the Development of Sustainable Vehicles and Charging Infrastructures in the Transport Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-5, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diep, Nhu Quynh & Fujimoto, Shinji & Minowa, Tomoaki & Sakanishi, Kinya & Nakagoshi, Nobukazu, 2012. "Estimation of the potential of rice straw for ethanol production and the optimum facility size for different regions in Vietnam," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 205-211.
    2. Miranowski, John & Rosburg, Alicia, 2010. "An Economic Breakeven Model of Cellulosic Feedstock Production and Ethanol Conversion with Implied Carbon Pricing," Staff General Research Papers Archive 13166, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    4. Wang, Xiaoquan & Morrison, William & Du, Zhenyi & Wan, Yiqin & Lin, Xiangyang & Chen, Paul & Ruan, Roger, 2012. "Biomass temperature profile development and its implications under the microwave-assisted pyrolysis condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-392.
    5. Tittmann, P.W. & Parker, N.C. & Hart, Q.J. & Jenkins, B.M., 2010. "A spatially explicit techno-economic model of bioenergy and biofuels production in California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 715-728.
    6. William Stafford & Adrian Lotter & Alan Brent & Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Biofuels technology: A look forward," WIDER Working Paper Series 087, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Khachatryan, Hayk & Jessup, Eric L. & Casavant, Ken, 2009. "Derivation of Crop Residue Feedstock Supply Curves Using Geographic Information Systems," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 48(1).
    8. Gallagher, Paul W. & Baumes, Harry, 2012. "Biomass Supply From Corn Residues: Estimates and Critical Review of Procedures," Agricultural Economic Reports 308488, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Parker, Nathan C, 2007. "Optimizing the Design of Biomass Hydrogen Supply Chains Using Real-World Spatial Distributions: A Case Study Using California Rice Straw," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8sp9n37c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Carriquiry, Miguel A. & Du, Xiaodong & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2011. "Second generation biofuels: Economics and policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4222-4234, July.
    11. Qian Chen & Yanling Jin & Guohua Zhang & Yang Fang & Yao Xiao & Hai Zhao, 2012. "Improving Production of Bioethanol from Duckweed ( Landoltia punctata ) by Pectinase Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Kesharwani, Rajkamal & Sun, Zeyi & Dagli, Cihan & Xiong, Haoyi, 2019. "Moving second generation biofuel manufacturing forward: Investigating economic viability and environmental sustainability considering two strategies for supply chain restructuring," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1467-1496.
    13. William Stafford & Adrian Lotter & Alan Brent & Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Biofuels technology: A look forward," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-87, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Scott M. Swinton & Felix Dulys & Sarah S.H. Klammer, 2021. "Why Biomass Residue Is Not as Plentiful as It Looks: Case Study on Economic Supply of Logging Residues," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 1003-1025, September.
    15. Sun, Shanxia & Johnson, David R. & Hertel, Thomas W., 2018. "Quantifying the Impacts of Biomass Co-Firing on GHG Emissions from Coal-Powered Electricity Generation," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274452, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Fan, Kang-Qi & Zhang, Peng-Fei & Pei, Z.J., 2013. "An assessment model for collecting and transporting cellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 786-794.
    17. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh & Day, Ken, 2014. "The effects of variations in supply accessibility and amount on the economics of using regional forest biomass for generating district heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 631-640.
    18. Petrolia, Daniel R., 2006. "Ethanol from Biomass: Economic and Environmental Potential of Converting Corn Stover and Hardwood Forest Residue in Minnesota," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21422, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Lavigne, Amanda & Powers, Susan E., 2007. "Evaluating fuel ethanol feedstocks from energy policy perspectives: A comparative energy assessment of corn and corn stover," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5918-5930, November.
    20. Diep, Nhu Quynh & Sakanishi, Kinya & Nakagoshi, Nobukazu & Fujimoto, Shinji & Minowa, Tomoaki, 2015. "Potential for rice straw ethanol production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 456-463.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2518-:d:544784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.