IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2150-d534656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method to Avoid Underestimated Risks in Seismic SUPSA and MUPSA for Nuclear Power Plants Caused by Partitioning Events

Author

Listed:
  • Woo Sik Jung

    (Quantum and Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea)

Abstract

Seismic probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) models for nuclear power plants (NPPs) have many non-rare events whose failure probabilities are proportional to the seismic ground acceleration. It has been widely accepted that minimal cut sets (MCSs) that are calculated from the seismic PSA fault tree should be converted into exact solutions, such as binary decision diagrams (BDDs), and that the accurate seismic core damage frequency (CDF) should be calculated from the exact solutions. If the seismic CDF is calculated directly from seismic MCSs, it is drastically overestimated. Seismic single-unit PSA (SUPSA) models have random failures of alternating operation systems that are combined with seismic failures of components and structures. Similarly, seismic multi-unit PSA (MUPSA) models have failures of NPPs that undergo alternating operations between full power and low power and shutdown (LPSD). Their failures for alternating operations are modeled using fraction or partitioning events in seismic SUPSA and MUPSA fault trees. Since partitioning events for one system are mutually exclusive, their combinations should be excluded in exact solutions. However, it is difficult to eliminate the combinations of mutually exclusive events without modifying PSA tools for generating MCSs from a fault tree and converting MCSs into exact solutions. If the combinations of mutually exclusive events are not deleted, seismic CDF is underestimated. To avoid CDF underestimation in seismic SUPSAs and MUPSAs, this paper introduces a process of converting partitioning events into conditional events, and conditional events are then inserted explicitly inside a fault tree. With this conversion, accurate CDF can be calculated without modifying PSA tools. That is, this process does not require any other special operations or tools. It is strongly recommended that the method in this paper be employed for avoiding CDF underestimation in seismic SUPSAs and MUPSAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Woo Sik Jung, 2021. "A Method to Avoid Underestimated Risks in Seismic SUPSA and MUPSA for Nuclear Power Plants Caused by Partitioning Events," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2150-:d:534656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schroer, Suzanne & Modarres, Mohammad, 2013. "An event classification schema for evaluating site risk in a multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-51.
    2. Zhou, Taotao & Modarres, Mohammad & Droguett, Enrique López, 2018. "An improved multi-unit nuclear plant seismic probabilistic risk assessment approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 34-47.
    3. Jung, Woo Sik, 2015. "A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 134-142.
    4. Hakata, Tadakuni, 2007. "Seismic PSA method for multiple nuclear power plants in a site," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 883-894.
    5. Modarres, Mohammad & Zhou, Taotao & Massoud, Mahmoud, 2017. "Advances in multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 87-100.
    6. Choi, Jong Soo & Cho, Nam Zin, 2007. "A practical method for accurate quantification of large fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 971-982.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gyunyoung Heo, 2022. "Advancements in Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Energy for Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-2, January.
    2. Kim, Yongjin & Jang, Seunghyun & Jae, Moosung, 2022. "Evaluation of inter-unit dependency effect on site core damage frequency: Internal and seismic event," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Geon Gyu Choi & Woo Sik Jung & Seong Kyu Park, 2021. "Sensitivity Study on the Correlation Level of Seismic Failures in Seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DeJesus Segarra, Jonathan & Bensi, Michelle & Modarres, Mohammad, 2023. "Multi-unit seismic probabilistic risk assessment: A Bayesian network perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Zhou, Taotao & Modarres, Mohammad & Droguett, Enrique López, 2021. "Multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment: A comprehensive survey," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Cai, Yinan & Golay, Michael W., 2020. "Formulation of A Risk Assessment Framework Capable of Analyzing Nuclear Power Multiunit Accident Scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Zhou, Taotao & Modarres, Mohammad & Droguett, Enrique López, 2019. "Multi-unit risk aggregation with consideration of uncertainty and bias in risk metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 473-482.
    5. Zhang, Sai & Du, Mengyu & Tong, Jiejuan & Li, Yan-Fu, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of maintenance program in multi-unit nuclear power plant sites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 532-548.
    6. Yoon, Jae Young & Kim, Dong-San, 2022. "Estimating the adverse effects of inter-unit radioactive release on operator actions at a multi-unit site," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Xiaohui Chen & Lin Zhang & Ze Zhang, 2020. "An integrated model for maintenance policies and production scheduling based on immune–culture algorithm," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(5), pages 651-663, October.
    8. Kwag, Shinyoung & Choi, Eujeong & Eem, Seunghyun & Ha, Jeong-Gon & Hahm, Daegi, 2021. "Toward improvement of sampling-based seismic probabilistic safety assessment method for nuclear facilities using composite distribution and adaptive discretization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Jang, Seunghyun & Kim, Yongjin & Jae, Moosung, 2021. "A site risk assessment for internal events: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Geon Gyu Choi & Woo Sik Jung & Seong Kyu Park, 2021. "Sensitivity Study on the Correlation Level of Seismic Failures in Seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Zhou, Taotao & Droguett, Enrique López & Modarres, Mohammad, 2020. "A common cause failure model for components under age-related degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Kwag, Shinyoung & Park, Junhee & Choi, In-Kil, 2020. "Development of efficient complete-sampling-based seismic PSA method for nuclear power plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Jang, Seunghyun & Jae, Moosung, 2020. "A development of methodology for assessing the inter-unit common cause failure in multi-unit PSA model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Arigi, Awwal Mohammed & Park, Gayoung & Kim, Jonghyun, 2020. "Dependency analysis method for human failure events in multi-unit probabilistic safety assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Jin, Kyungho & Hwang, Yujeong & Heo, Gyunyoung, 2021. "Development of Dependence Indexes for Multi-Unit Risk Assessment and its Estimation Using Copula," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Song, Wonjong & Park, Sunghyun & Seo, Yein & Jae, Moosung, 2020. "A source term binning methodology for multi-unit consequence analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Kim, Yongjin & Jang, Seunghyun & Jae, Moosung, 2022. "Evaluation of inter-unit dependency effect on site core damage frequency: Internal and seismic event," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Wanxin Feng & Ming Wang & Zhixin Xu & Yu Yu, 2023. "The Method of Calculating the Frequency of the Initiating Event in a Dual-Unit Site with the Example of LOOP Events," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-8, January.
    19. Kim, Man Cheol, 2022. "Systematic approach and mathematical development for conditional core damage probabilities under station blackout of a nuclear power plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Ayoub, Ali & Stankovski, Andrej & Kröger, Wolfgang & Sornette, Didier, 2021. "Precursors and startling lessons: Statistical analysis of 1250 events with safety significance from the civil nuclear sector," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2150-:d:534656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.