IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v134y2015icp134-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Jung, Woo Sik

Abstract

In order to calculate the more accurate top event probability from cutsets or minimal cut sets (MCSs) than the conventional method that adopts the rare event approximation (REA) or min cut upper bound (MCUB) calculation, advanced cutset upper bound estimator (ACUBE) software had been developed several years ago and shortly became a vital tool for calculating the accurate core damage frequency of nuclear power plants in probabilistic safety assessment (PSA).

Suggested Citation

  • Jung, Woo Sik, 2015. "A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 134-142.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:134:y:2015:i:c:p:134-142
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014002609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mo, Yuchang, 2013. "Can we trust module-respect heuristics?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 139-146.
    2. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Dai, Yuanshun, 2013. "Reliability of non-repairable phased-mission systems with propagated failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 218-228.
    3. Olivier Nusbaumer & Antoine Rauzy, 2013. "Fault tree linking versus event tree linking approaches: a reasoned comparison," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(3), pages 315-326, June.
    4. Andrews, J.D. & Poole, J. & Chen, W.H., 2013. "Fast mission reliability prediction for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 3-9.
    5. Jung, Woo Sik & Yang, Joon-Eon & Ha, Jaejoo, 2005. "Development of measures to estimate truncation error in fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 30-36.
    6. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "BDD-based reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with internal/external common-cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 145-153.
    7. Choi, Jong Soo & Cho, Nam Zin, 2007. "A practical method for accurate quantification of large fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 971-982.
    8. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2012. "Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with functional dependence in one of phases," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 90-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Ji-Min & Wu, Xiao-Yue & Liu, Yiliu & Ann Lundteigen, Mary, 2015. "Reliability analysis of large phased-mission systems with repairable components based on success-state sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 123-133.
    2. Woo Sik Jung, 2021. "A Method to Avoid Underestimated Risks in Seismic SUPSA and MUPSA for Nuclear Power Plants Caused by Partitioning Events," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Nicolae Brînzei & Jean-François Aubry, 2018. "Graphs models and algorithms for reliability assessment of coherent and non-coherent systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 201-215, April.
    4. Forghani-elahabad, Majid & Mahdavi-Amiri, Nezam, 2015. "An efficient algorithm for the multi-state two separate minimal paths reliability problem with budget constraint," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 472-481.
    5. Ji Suk Kim & Man Cheol Kim, 2021. "Development of a Software Tool for Seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessment Quantification with a Sufficiently Large Number of Bins for Enhanced Accuracy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Qiang & Liu, Meng & Dui, Hongyan & Ren, Yi & Sun, Bo & Yang, Dezhen & Wang, Zili, 2022. "Importance measure-based phased mission reliability and UAV number optimization for swarm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Lu, Ji-Min & Wu, Xiao-Yue & Liu, Yiliu & Ann Lundteigen, Mary, 2015. "Reliability analysis of large phased-mission systems with repairable components based on success-state sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 123-133.
    3. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a BWR plant system at startup stage  - analysis by the GO-FLOW methodology with consideration of loop structures and phased mission problem -," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 352-361.
    7. Hua Yan & Pu Long Cui & Yi Sheng Wang & Fei Wan & De Li & Bi Xing Li, 2018. "A Hierarchical Reduced Markov Model for Reliability Evaluation of Phased-Mission Systems," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 11(4), pages 8637-8640, November.
    8. Wu, Xin-yang & Wu, Xiao-Yue, 2015. "Extended object-oriented Petri net model for mission reliability simulation of repairable PMS with common cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 109-119.
    9. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2017. "Redundancy optimization for series-parallel phased mission systems exposed to random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 554-560.
    10. Huang, Xianzhen & Aslett, Louis J.M. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2019. "Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-422.
    11. Chen, Ying & Li, YingYi & Kang, Rui & Ali, Mosleh, 2020. "Reliability analysis of PMS with failure mechanism accumulation rules and a hierarchical method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Yu, Shengji, 2014. "Optimal connecting elements allocation in linear consecutively-connected systems with phased mission and common cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 85-94.
    13. Xisheng Jia & Wenbin Cao & Qiwei Hu, 2019. "Selective maintenance optimization for random phased-mission systems subject to random common cause failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 379-400, June.
    14. Wang, Yujie & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory & Huang, Ning, 2018. "Probabilistic competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 37-51.
    15. Wu, Xiaoyue & Hillston, Jane, 2015. "Mission reliability of semi-Markov systems under generalized operational time requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 122-129.
    16. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Reliability analysis of multi-trigger binary systems subject to competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 9-17.
    17. Duflot, Nicolas & Bérenguer, Christophe & Dieulle, Laurence & Vasseur, Dominique, 2009. "A min cut-set-wise truncation procedure for importance measures computation in probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1827-1837.
    18. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2018. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems in a random environment with variable shock rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-17.
    19. Tang, Maochun & Xiahou, Tangfan & Liu, Yu, 2023. "Mission performance analysis of phased-mission systems with cross-phase competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ACUBE; BDD; Cutsets;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:134:y:2015:i:c:p:134-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.