IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7103-d669602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biochemical Methane Potential of Swine Slaughter Waste, Swine Slurry, and Its Codigestion Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Anriansyah Renggaman

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
    Microbial Biotechnology Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, School of Life Science and Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Hong Lim Choi

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
    Resourcification Research Center for Crop-Animal Farming, Seoul 08800, Korea)

  • Sartika Indah Amalia Sudiarto

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
    Ecology Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, School of Life Science and Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Andi Febrisiantosa

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
    Research Unit for Natural Product Technology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Yogyakarta 55861, Indonesia)

  • Dong Hyoen Ahn

    (GreenLabs, Seoul 05854, Korea)

  • Yong Wook Choung

    (GreenLabs, Seoul 05854, Korea)

  • Arumuganainar Suresh

    (Waste Management Unit, Suguna Foods Private Limited, Udumalaipettai 642126, India)

Abstract

The codigestion of slaughter waste with animal manure can improve its methane yield, and digestion parameters; however, limited studies are available for the effectiveness of anaerobic codigestion using swine slaughter waste (SSW) and swine slurry (SS). Hence, this study was conducted to determine the characteristics of SSW and the effect of anaerobic codigestion with (SS) and explored the potential of CH 4 production ( M max ), the lag phase period (?), and effective digestion time ( T eff ). SSW contains fat and protein contents of 54% and 30% dry weight within 18.2% of solid matters, whereas SS showed only 6% and 28% within 4.1% of solid matters, respectively. During sole anaerobic digestion, SSW produced a high M max (711 Nml CH 4 /g VS added ) but had a long duration ? (~9 days); whereas SS produced a low M max (516 Nml CH 4 /g VS added ) but had a shorter duration ? (1 day). Codigestion increased the M max from 22–84% with no significant T eff compared to sole SS digestion. However, the low M max of SS and high M max of SSW, resulted in a 7–32% decrease in M max at codigestion compared to SSW sole digestion. Codigestion improved the digestion efficiency as it reduced ? (3.3–8.5 days shorter) and T eff (6.5–9.1 days faster) compared to SSW sole digestion. The substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 0.5 was better than 1; the volatile solid and micronutrient availability may be attributed to improved digestion. These results can be used for the better management of SSW and SS for bio-energy production on a large scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Anriansyah Renggaman & Hong Lim Choi & Sartika Indah Amalia Sudiarto & Andi Febrisiantosa & Dong Hyoen Ahn & Yong Wook Choung & Arumuganainar Suresh, 2021. "Biochemical Methane Potential of Swine Slaughter Waste, Swine Slurry, and Its Codigestion Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7103-:d:669602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Yong-Sung & Yoon, Young-Man & Kim, Chang-Hyun & Giersdorf, Jens, 2012. "Status of biogas technologies and policies in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3430-3438.
    2. Rao, M. S. & Singh, S. P. & Singh, A. K. & Sodha, M. S., 2000. "Bioenergy conversion studies of the organic fraction of MSW: assessment of ultimate bioenergy production potential of municipal garbage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 75-87, May.
    3. Zhang, Wanqin & Wei, Quanyuan & Wu, Shubiao & Qi, Dandan & Li, Wei & Zuo, Zhuang & Dong, Renjie, 2014. "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-183.
    4. Alvarez, René & Lidén, Gunnar, 2008. "Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 726-734.
    5. Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Kim, Sang Hun, 2013. "Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-72.
    6. Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Vila, J. & Mata-Alvarez, J. & Chimenos, J.M. & Astals, S., 2016. "The role of additives on anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1486-1499.
    7. Tasnia Hassan Nazifa & Noori M. Cata Saady & Carlos Bazan & Sohrab Zendehboudi & Adnan Aftab & Talib M. Albayati, 2021. "Anaerobic Digestion of Blood from Slaughtered Livestock: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Moreira, Maria Teresa, 2017. "The environmental effect of substituting energy crops for food waste as feedstock for biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1130-1143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elsamadony, M. & Tawfik, A. & Suzuki, M., 2015. "Surfactant-enhanced biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) via dry anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 272-282.
    2. Yun, Sining & Fang, Wen & Du, Tingting & Hu, Xieli & Huang, Xinlei & Li, Xue & Zhang, Chen & Lund, Peter D., 2018. "Use of bio-based carbon materials for improving biogas yield and digestate stability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 898-909.
    3. Sarto, Sarto & Hildayati, Raudati & Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 335-350.
    4. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    5. Solli, Linn & Schnürer, Anna & Horn, Svein J., 2018. "Process performance and population dynamics of ammonium tolerant microorganisms during co-digestion of fish waste and manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 529-536.
    6. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    7. Freitas, F.F. & Furtado, A.C. & Piñas, J.A.V. & Venturini, O.J. & Barros, R.M. & Lora, E.E.S., 2022. "Holistic Life Cycle Assessment of a biogas-based electricity generation plant in a pig farm considering co-digestion and an additive," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    8. Grosser, Anna, 2018. "Determination of methane potential of mixtures composed of sewage sludge, organic fraction of municipal waste and grease trap sludge using biochemical methane potential assays. A comparison of BMP tes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 488-499.
    9. Bacsik, Zoltán & Cheung, Ocean & Vasiliev, Petr & Hedin, Niklas, 2016. "Selective separation of CO2 and CH4 for biogas upgrading on zeolite NaKA and SAPO-56," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 613-621.
    10. Zhang, Wanqin & Wei, Quanyuan & Wu, Shubiao & Qi, Dandan & Li, Wei & Zuo, Zhuang & Dong, Renjie, 2014. "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-183.
    11. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    13. Qi, Chuanren & Cao, Dingge & Gao, Xingzu & Jia, Sumeng & Yin, Rongrong & Nghiem, Long D. & Li, Guoxue & Luo, Wenhai, 2023. "Optimising organic composition of feedstock to improve microbial dynamics and symbiosis to advance solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    14. Sayedin, Farid & Kermanshahi-pour, Azadeh & He, Quan Sophia, 2019. "Evaluating the potential of a novel anaerobic baffled reactor for anaerobic digestion of thin stillage: Effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and recycle ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 975-983.
    15. Capson-Tojo, G. & Moscoviz, R. & Astals, S. & Robles, Á. & Steyer, J.-P., 2020. "Unraveling the literature chaos around free ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    17. Costantini, Michele & Provolo, Giorgio & Bacenetti, Jacopo, 2024. "The effects of incorporating renewable energy into the environmental footprint of beef production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    18. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    19. Syaichurrozi, Iqbal & Basyir, M. Fakhri & Farraz, Rafi Muhammad & Rusdi, Rusdi, 2020. "A preliminary study: Effect of initial pH and Saccharomyces cerevisiae addition on biogas production from acid-pretreated Salvinia molesta and kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    20. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Lasagni, Marzio & Borges, Marisa Soares & Gonzales, Thiago H., 2018. "Replacement of energy crops with bio-waste in existing anaerobic digestion plants: An energetic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 202-213.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7103-:d:669602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.