IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2020i1p73-d468230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pellet Production from Miscanthus: Energy and Environmental Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Fusi

    (Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Jacopo Bacenetti

    (Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Andrea R. Proto

    (Department of Agraria, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Doriana E. A. Tedesco

    (Department of Environmental and Policy Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Domenico Pessina

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science—Production, Landscape, Ageoenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Davide Facchinetti

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science—Production, Landscape, Ageoenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The production of wood pellets has grown considerably in the last decades. Besides woody biomass, other feedstocks can be used for pellet production. Among these, miscanthus presents some advantages because, even if specifically cultivated, it requires low inputs such as fertilisers and pesticides and shows high biomass yield (up to 28 tons of dry matter ha −1 in Europe). Even if in the last years some studies evaluated the environmental impact of woody pellet production, there is no information about the environmental performances of miscanthus pellet production. In this study, the environmental impact of miscanthus pellet was evaluated using the Life Cycle Assessment approach with a cradle-to plant gate perspective. Primary data were collected in a small-medium size pelletizing plant located in Northern Italy where miscanthus is cultivated to be directly processed. The results highlight how the miscanthus pellet shows lower environmental impact compared to woody pellet, mainly due to the lower energy consumption during pelletizing. The possibility to pelletize the miscanthus biomass without any drying offsets the environmental impact related to the miscanthus cultivation for all the evaluated impact categories (except for Marine eutrophication). In detail, for global warming potential, 1 ton of miscanthus pellet shows an impact of 121.6 kg CO 2 eq. (about 8% lower respect to woody pellet) while for the other evaluated impact categories the impact reduction ranges from 4 to 59%. Harvesting, which unlike the other field operations is carried out every year, is by far the main contributor to the impacts of the cultivation phase while electricity is the main contributor to the pelletizing phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Fusi & Jacopo Bacenetti & Andrea R. Proto & Doriana E. A. Tedesco & Domenico Pessina & Davide Facchinetti, 2020. "Pellet Production from Miscanthus: Energy and Environmental Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:73-:d:468230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connolly, D. & Lund, H. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2016. "Smart Energy Europe: The technical and economic impact of one potential 100% renewable energy scenario for the European Union," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1634-1653.
    2. Judl, Jáchym & Koskela, Sirkka & Korpela, Timo & Karvosenoja, Niko & Häyrinen, Anna & Rantsi, Jari, 2014. "Net environmental impacts of low-share wood pellet co-combustion in an existing coal-fired CHP (combined heat and power) production in Helsinki, Finland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 844-851.
    3. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.
    4. Bacenetti, Jacopo, 2019. "Heat and cold production for winemaking using pruning residues: Environmental impact assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Song, Shizhong & Liu, Pei & Xu, Jing & Chong, Chinhao & Huang, Xianzheng & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2017. "Life cycle assessment and economic evaluation of pellet fuel from corn straw in China: A case study in Jilin Province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-381.
    6. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Jonsson, Ragnar & Rinaldi, Francesca, 2017. "The impact on global wood-product markets of increasing consumption of wood pellets within the European Union," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 864-878.
    8. Kitzing, Lena & Mitchell, Catherine & Morthorst, Poul Erik, 2012. "Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 192-201.
    9. Wang, Changbo & Chang, Yuan & Zhang, Lixiao & Pang, Mingyue & Hao, Yan, 2017. "A life-cycle comparison of the energy, environmental and economic impacts of coal versus wood pellets for generating heat in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 374-384.
    10. Murphy, Fionnuala & Devlin, Ger & McDonnell, Kevin, 2013. "Miscanthus production and processing in Ireland: An analysis of energy requirements and environmental impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 412-420.
    11. Zamorano, M. & Popov, V. & Rodríguez, M.L. & García-Maraver, A., 2011. "A comparative study of quality properties of pelletized agricultural and forestry lopping residues," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3133-3140.
    12. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    13. Rabaçal, M. & Fernandes, U. & Costa, M., 2013. "Combustion and emission characteristics of a domestic boiler fired with pellets of pine, industrial wood wastes and peach stones," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 220-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Stachowicz, Paweł & Dudziec, Paweł, 2022. "Wood pellet quality depending on dendromass species," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 498-508.
    2. Hossain, Tasmin & Jones, Daniela S. & Godfrey, Edward & Saloni, Daniel & Sharara, Mahmoud & Hartley, Damon S., 2024. "Characterizing value-added pellets obtained from blends of miscanthus, corn stover, and switchgrass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Marques, Pedro & Freire, Fausto & Arroja, Luís & Dias, Ana Cláudia, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of biomass pellets: A review of methodological choices and results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Iris Kral & Gerhard Piringer & Molly K. Saylor & Javier Lizasoain & Andreas Gronauer & Alexander Bauer, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas Production from Unused Grassland Biomass Pretreated by Steam Explosion Using a System Expansion Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Pang, Mingyue, 2021. "Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Clemente, D. & Rosa-Santos, P. & Taveira-Pinto, F., 2021. "On the potential synergies and applications of wave energy converters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Jung-Kyu Lee & Dongho Hong & Hyunkyu Chae & Dong-Hoon Lee, 2023. "Prediction of Storage Conditions to Increase the Bioenergy Efficiency of Giant Miscanthus Pellets Produced through On-Site Integrated Pretreatment Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Dragos Paun, 2017. "Sustainability and Financial Performance of Companies in the Energy Sector in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Murphy, Fionnuala & Sosa, Amanda & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-energy systems in Ireland modelled with biomass supply chain optimisation based on greenhouse gas emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1040-1055.
    9. Sungur, Bilal & Topaloğlu, Bahattin, 2020. "Experimental analysis of combustion performance of biodiesel absorbed pellets in a domestic boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Bala-Litwiniak, Agnieszka & Zajemska, Monika, 2020. "Computational and experimental study of pine and sunflower husk pellet combustion and co-combustion with oats in domestic boiler," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 151-159.
    11. María Teresa Miranda & Irene Montero & Francisco José Sepúlveda & José Ignacio Arranz & Carmen Victoria Rojas, 2017. "Design and Implementation of a Data Acquisition System for Combustion Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Diesendorf, Mark & Elliston, Ben, 2018. "The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: A response to critics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 318-330.
    13. Sungur, Bilal & Topaloglu, Bahattin, 2019. "An experimental investigation of the effect of smoke tube configuration on the performance and emission characteristics of pellet-fuelled boilers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 121-129.
    14. Campos-Guzmán, Verónica & García-Cáscales, M. Socorro & Espinosa, Nieves & Urbina, Antonio, 2019. "Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 343-366.
    15. Maciej Dzikuć & Joanna Wyrobek & Łukasz Popławski, 2021. "Economic Determinants of Low-Carbon Development in the Visegrad Group Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Wang, Jiangjiang & Deng, Hongda & Qi, Xiaoling, 2022. "Cost-based site and capacity optimization of multi-energy storage system in the regional integrated energy networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    17. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Gerbaulet, Clemens & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Kemfert, Claudia & Lorenz, Casimir & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2019. "European electricity sector decarbonization under different levels of foresight," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 141, pages 973-987.
    19. Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Sorknæs, Peter & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Chang, Miguel & Madsen, Poul Thøis & Kany, Mikkel Strunge & Skov, Iva Ridjan, 2022. "Smart energy Denmark. A consistent and detailed strategy for a fully decarbonized society," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Muhammad Amir Raza & Muhammad Mohsin Aman & Altaf Hussain Rajpar & Mohamed Bashir Ali Bashir & Touqeer Ahmed Jumani, 2022. "Towards Achieving 100% Renewable Energy Supply for Sustainable Climate Change in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:73-:d:468230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.