IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2020i1p52-d467707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Wake Model Superposition and Secondary Steering on Model-Based Wake Steering Control with SCADA Data Assimilation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael F. Howland

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
    Graduate Aerospace Laboratories (GALCIT), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA)

  • John O. Dabiri

    (Graduate Aerospace Laboratories (GALCIT), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
    Mechanical and Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA)

Abstract

Methods for wind farm power optimization through the use of wake steering often rely on engineering wake models due to the computational complexity associated with resolving wind farm dynamics numerically. Within the transient, turbulent atmospheric boundary layer, closed-loop control is required to dynamically adjust to evolving wind conditions, wherein the optimal wake model parameters are estimated as a function of time in a hybrid physics- and data-driven approach using supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data. Analytic wake models rely on wake velocity deficit superposition methods to generalize the individual wake deficit to collective wind farm flow. In this study, the impact of the wake model superposition methodologies on closed-loop control are tested in large eddy simulations of the conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer with full Coriolis effects. A model for the non-vanishing lateral velocity trailing a yaw misaligned turbine, termed secondary steering, is also presented, validated, and tested in the closed-loop control framework. Modified linear and momentum conserving wake superposition methodologies increase the power production in closed-loop wake steering control statistically significantly more than linear superposition. While the secondary steering model increases the power production and reduces the predictive error associated with the wake model, the impact is not statistically significant. Modified linear and momentum conserving superposition using the proposed secondary steering model increase a six turbine array power production, compared to baseline control, in large eddy simulations by 7.5 % and 7.7 % , respectively, with wake model predictive mean absolute errors of 0.03 P 1 and 0.04 P 1 , respectively, where P 1 is the baseline power production of the leading turbine in the array. Ensemble Kalman filter parameter estimation significantly reduces the wake model predictive error for all wake deficit superposition and secondary steering cases compared to predefined model parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael F. Howland & John O. Dabiri, 2020. "Influence of Wake Model Superposition and Secondary Steering on Model-Based Wake Steering Control with SCADA Data Assimilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:52-:d:467707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doekemeijer, Bart M. & van der Hoek, Daan & van Wingerden, Jan-Willem, 2020. "Closed-loop model-based wind farm control using FLORIS under time-varying inflow conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 719-730.
    2. Mahdi Abkar & Jens Nørkær Sørensen & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "An Analytical Model for the Effect of Vertical Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Michael F. Howland & John O. Dabiri, 2019. "Wind Farm Modeling with Interpretable Physics-Informed Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Archer, Cristina L. & Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Yan, Chi & Wu, Sicheng & Pan, Yang & Brodie, Joseph F. & Maguire, A. Eoghan, 2018. "Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1187-1207.
    5. Bastankhah, Majid & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2014. "A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 116-123.
    6. Ciri, Umberto & Rotea, Mario A. & Leonardi, Stefano, 2017. "Model-free control of wind farms: A comparative study between individual and coordinated extremum seeking," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1033-1045.
    7. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Kanev, Stoyan, 2020. "Dynamic wake steering and its impact on wind farm power production and yaw actuator duty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 9-15.
    9. Staffell, Iain & Green, Richard, 2014. "How does wind farm performance decline with age?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 775-786.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Teng & Corey D. Markfort, 2020. "A Calibration Procedure for an Analytical Wake Model Using Wind Farm Operational Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    4. van den Broek, Maarten J. & De Tavernier, Delphine & Sanderse, Benjamin & van Wingerden, Jan-Willem, 2022. "Adjoint optimisation for wind farm flow control with a free-vortex wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 752-765.
    5. Arslan Salim Dar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2022. "An Analytical Model for Wind Turbine Wakes under Pressure Gradient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Emmanuvel Joseph Aju & Dhanush Bhamitipadi Suresh & Yaqing Jin, 2020. "The Influence of Winglet Pitching on the Performance of a Model Wind Turbine: Aerodynamic Loads, Rotating Speed, and Wake Statistics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Javier Serrano González & Bruno López & Martín Draper, 2021. "Optimal Pitch Angle Strategy for Energy Maximization in Offshore Wind Farms Considering Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Bart Matthijs Doekemeijer & Eric Simley & Paul Fleming, 2022. "Comparison of the Gaussian Wind Farm Model with Historical Data of Three Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Cheng, Yu & Zhang, Mingming & Zhang, Ziliang & Xu, Jianzhong, 2019. "A new analytical model for wind turbine wakes based on Monin-Obukhov similarity theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 96-106.
    10. Dar, Arslan Salim & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2022. "Wind turbine wakes on escarpments: A wind-tunnel study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1258-1275.
    11. Sadek, Zein & Scott, Ryan & Hamilton, Nicholas & Cal, Raúl Bayoán, 2023. "A three-dimensional, analytical wind turbine wake model: Flow acceleration, empirical correlations, and continuity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 298-309.
    12. Ling, Ziyan & Zhao, Zhenzhou & Liu, Yige & Liu, Huiwen & Ali, Kashif & Liu, Yan & Wen, Yifan & Wang, Dingding & Li, Shijun & Su, Chunhao, 2024. "Multi-objective layout optimization for wind farms based on non-uniformly distributed turbulence and a new three-dimensional multiple wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Syed Ahmed Kabir, Ijaz Fazil & Safiyullah, Ferozkhan & Ng, E.Y.K. & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2020. "New analytical wake models based on artificial intelligence and rivalling the benchmark full-rotor CFD predictions under both uniform and ABL inflows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Ziyu Zhang & Peng Huang & Haocheng Sun, 2020. "A Novel Analytical Wake Model with a Cosine-Shaped Velocity Deficit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    16. Shen, Wen Zhong & Lin, Jian Wei & Jiang, Yu Hang & Feng, Ju & Cheng, Li & Zhu, Wei Jun, 2023. "A novel yaw wake model for wind farm control applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Wake modeling of wind turbines using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    18. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Determining an Appropriate Parameter of Analytical Wake Models for Energy Capture and Layout Optimization on Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Souaiby, Marwa & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2024. "An improved analytical framework for flow prediction inside and downstream of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    20. Gu, Bo & Meng, Hang & Ge, Mingwei & Zhang, Hongtao & Liu, Xinyu, 2021. "Cooperative multiagent optimization method for wind farm power delivery maximization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:52-:d:467707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.