IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i8p1886-d344850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimal Operation for Steam Power Scheduling Based on Economic and Exergetic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Huang

    (Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Weizhen Hou

    (Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Yiran Huang

    (Department of Engineering Electronics and Communication Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Jiayu Li

    (Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Qixian Li

    (Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Dongfeng Wang

    (Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Yan Zhang

    (Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

Abstract

Steam supply scheduling (SSS) plays an important role in providing uninterrupted reliable energy to meet the heat and electricity demand in both the industrial and residential sectors. However, the system complexity makes it challenging to operate efficiently. Besides, the operational objectives in terms of economic cost and thermodynamic efficiency are usually contradictory, making the online scheduling even more intractable. To this end, the thermodynamic efficiency is evaluated based on exergetic analysis in this paper, and an economic-exergetic optimal scheduling model is formulated into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem. Moreover, the ε -constraint method is used to obtain the Pareto front of the multi-objective optimization model, and fuzzy satisfying approach is introduced to decide the unique operation strategy of the SSS. In the single-period case results, compared with the optimal scheduling which only takes the economic index as the objective function, the operation cost of the multi-objective optimization is increased by 4.59%, and the exergy efficiency is increased by 9.3%. Compared with the optimal scheduling which only takes the exergetic index as the objective function, the operation cost of the multi-objective optimization is decreased by 19.83%, and the exergy efficiency is decreased by 2.39%. Furthermore, results of single-period and multi-period multi-objective optimal scheduling verify the effectiveness of the model and the solution proposed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Huang & Weizhen Hou & Yiran Huang & Jiayu Li & Qixian Li & Dongfeng Wang & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimal Operation for Steam Power Scheduling Based on Economic and Exergetic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:1886-:d:344850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/1886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/1886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmadi, Gholamreza & Toghraie, Davood & Akbari, Omidali, 2019. "Energy, exergy and environmental (3E) analysis of the existing CHP system in a petrochemical plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 234-242.
    2. Luo, Xianglong & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2011. "Modeling and optimization of a utility system containing multiple extractions steam turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3501-3512.
    3. Zeng, Yujiao & Xiao, Xin & Li, Jie & Sun, Li & Floudas, Christodoulos A. & Li, Hechang, 2018. "A novel multi-period mixed-integer linear optimization model for optimal distribution of byproduct gases, steam and power in an iron and steel plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 881-899.
    4. Zhao, Liang & You, Fengqi, 2019. "A data-driven approach for industrial utility systems optimization under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 559-569.
    5. Dorotić, Hrvoje & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2019. "Economical, environmental and exergetic multi-objective optimization of district heating systems on hourly level for a whole year," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Luo, Xianglong & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2013. "Operational planning optimization of steam power plants considering equipment failure in petrochemical complex," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1247-1264.
    7. Yu Huang & Shuqin Li & Peng Ding & Yan Zhang & Kai Yang & Weiting Zhang, 2019. "Optimal Operation for Economic and Exergetic Objectives of a Multiple Energy Carrier System Considering Demand Response Program," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Douglas, Tamunosaki & Big-Alabo, Akuro, 2018. "A generic algorithm of sustainability (GAS) function for industrial complex steam turbine and utility system optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 881-897.
    9. Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Advanced exergy-based methods used to understand and improve energy-conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 238-246.
    10. Sun, Li & Gai, Limei & Smith, Robin, 2017. "Site utility system optimization with operation adjustment under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 450-456.
    11. Wang, Jiangjiang & Chen, Yuzhu & Lior, Noam & Li, Weihua, 2019. "Energy, exergy and environmental analysis of a hybrid combined cooling heating and power system integrated with compound parabolic concentrated-photovoltaic thermal solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 463-476.
    12. Sun, Li & Shen, Jiong & Hua, Qingsong & Lee, Kwang Y., 2018. "Data-driven oxygen excess ratio control for proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 866-875.
    13. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2010. "Exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a cogeneration plant system using Multimodal Genetic Algorithm (MGA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5161-5172.
    14. Sevinchan, Eren & Dincer, Ibrahim & Lang, Haoxiang, 2019. "Energy and exergy analyses of a biogas driven multigenerational system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 715-723.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Du, Wenli & Zhong, Weimin & Qian, Feng, 2020. "Large-scale industrial energy systems optimization under uncertainty: A data-driven robust optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Han, Yulin & Zheng, Jingyuan & Luo, Xiaoyan & Qian, Yu & Yang, Siyu, 2023. "Multi-scenario data-driven robust optimisation for industrial steam power systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Wang, Meihong & Du, Wenli & Qian, Feng, 2022. "Data-driven adaptive robust optimization for energy systems in ethylene plant under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Luo, Xianglong & Huang, Xiaojian & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. & Ponce-Ortega, José María & Chen, Ying, 2016. "Simultaneous synthesis of utility system and heat exchanger network incorporating steam condensate and boiler feedwater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 875-893.
    5. Zhu, Qiannan & Luo, Xianglong & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2016. "Mathematical modeling, validation, and operation optimization of an industrial complex steam turbine network-methodology and application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 191-213.
    6. Aldair Benavides Gamero & Josué Camargo Vanegas & Jorge Duarte Forero & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Rafael Diaz Herazo, 2023. "Advanced Exergo-Environmental Assessments of an Organic Rankine Cycle as Waste Heat Recovery System from a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Park, Haryn & Kim, Jin-Kuk & Yi, Sung Chul, 2023. "Optimization of site utility systems for renewable energy integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    8. Huang, Xiaojian & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Chen, Ying & María Ponce-Ortega, José & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M., 2018. "Synthesis and dual-objective optimization of industrial combined heat and power plants compromising the water–energy nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 448-468.
    9. Luo, Xianglong & Hu, Jiahao & Zhao, Jun & Zhang, Bingjian & Chen, Ying & Mo, Songping, 2014. "Multi-objective optimization for the design and synthesis of utility systems with emission abatement technology concerns," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1110-1131.
    10. Liew, Peng Yen & Theo, Wai Lip & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Abdul Manan, Zainuddin & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev, 2017. "Total Site Heat Integration planning and design for industrial, urban and renewable systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 964-985.
    11. Zhang, B.J. & Liu, K. & Luo, X.L. & Chen, Q.L. & Li, W.K., 2015. "A multi-period mathematical model for simultaneous optimization of materials and energy on the refining site scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 238-250.
    12. Feng, Chao & Zhu, Rong & Wei, Guangsheng & Dong, Kai & Xia, Tao, 2023. "Typical case of CO2 capture in Chinese iron and steel enterprises: Exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    13. Jing Bai & Chuang Tu & Jiming Bai, 2024. "Measuring and decomposing Beijing’s energy performance: an energy- and exergy-based perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17617-17633, July.
    14. Zhou, Dengji & Yan, Siyun & Huang, Dawen & Shao, Tiemin & Xiao, Wang & Hao, Jiarui & Wang, Chen & Yu, Tianqi, 2022. "Modeling and simulation of the hydrogen blended gas-electricity integrated energy system and influence analysis of hydrogen blending modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    15. Sun, Li & Sun, Wen & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Core temperature modelling and monitoring of lithium-ion battery in the presence of sensor bias," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    16. Anvari, Simin & Mahian, Omid & Taghavifar, Hadi & Wongwises, Somchai & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "4E analysis of a modified multigeneration system designed for power, heating/cooling, and water desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Mortadi, M. & El Fadar, A. & Achkari Begdouri, O., 2024. "4E analysis of photovoltaic thermal collector-based tri-generation system with adsorption cooling: Annual simulation under Moroccan climate conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: A multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    19. Sun, Li & Li, Guanru & Hua, Q.S. & Jin, Yuhui, 2020. "A hybrid paradigm combining model-based and data-driven methods for fuel cell stack cooling control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1642-1652.
    20. Yuxiao Qin & Guodong Zhao & Qingsong Hua & Li Sun & Soumyadeep Nag, 2019. "Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm-Based Optimization of PID Controller Parameters for Fuel Cell Voltage and Fuel Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:1886-:d:344850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.