IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1481-d335118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Enthalpy as an IAQ Indicator in Hot and Humid Environment—Experimental Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Piasecki

    (Building Research Institute, Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Krystyna Kostyrko

    (Building Research Institute, Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 24 Warszawska Street, 31-150 Krakow, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Nowak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 24 Warszawska Street, 31-150 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The authors studied the impact of indoor air humidity in the range of 60% to 90% on building user perception in the temperature range of 26 to 28 °C. The research thesis was put forward that the impact of humidity on indoor air quality dissatisfaction of building users in a warm and humid indoor environment is greater than that indicated in thermal comfort models. The presented experiment examined the indoor air quality perception of n = 28 subjects in the test chamber of a nearly zero energy building under ten environmental conditions, together with a thermal comfort assessment. The authors developed an experimental relation for predicting building users’ satisfaction based on the Weber–Fechner law, where the predicted percentage of dissatisfied users ( PD ) is determined by means of air enthalpy ( h ), PD = f( h ). The obtained results confirmed the sated thesis. Additionally, the intersection points of the experimental function and isotherms resulting from the Fanger model are presented, where the thermal comfort assessment starts to indicate lower user dissatisfaction results than experimental values. The authors recommend the experimental equation for humid air enthalpies in the range of 50 to 90 kJ/kg. The indoor air quality assessment based on the enthalpy value is simple and can be used to determine the overall Indoor Environmental Quality index of a building (IEQ index ).

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Katarzyna Nowak, 2020. "Air Enthalpy as an IAQ Indicator in Hot and Humid Environment—Experimental Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1481-:d:335118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Croitoru, Cristiana & Nastase, Ilinca & Bode, Florin & Meslem, Amina & Dogeanu, Angel, 2015. "Thermal comfort models for indoor spaces and vehicles—Current capabilities and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 304-318.
    2. Djongyang, Noël & Tchinda, René & Njomo, Donatien, 2010. "Thermal comfort: A review paper," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2626-2640, December.
    3. Michał Piasecki & Mateusz Kozicki & Szymon Firląg & Anna Goljan & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2018. "The Approach of Including TVOCs Concentration in the Indoor Environmental Quality Model (IEQ)—Case Studies of BREEAM Certified Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Michał Piasecki & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Marcin Furtak & Jacek Biskupski, 2019. "Experimental Confirmation of the Reliability of Fanger’s Thermal Comfort Model—Case Study of a Near-Zero Energy Building (NZEB) Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marek Dudzik & Anna Romanska-Zapala & Mark Bomberg, 2020. "A Neural Network for Monitoring and Characterization of Buildings with Environmental Quality Management, Part 1: Verification under Steady State Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Benedetto Nastasi & Francesco Mancini, 2021. "Procedures and Methodologies for the Control and Improvement of Energy-Environmental Quality in Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-2, April.
    3. Pisello, A.L. & Pigliautile, I. & Andargie, M. & Berger, C. & Bluyssen, P.M. & Carlucci, S. & Chinazzo, G. & Deme Belafi, Z. & Dong, B. & Favero, M. & Ghahramani, A. & Havenith, G. & Heydarian, A. & K, 2021. "Test rooms to study human comfort in buildings: A review of controlled experiments and facilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Walery Jezierski & Dorota Anna Krawczyk & Beata Sadowska, 2023. "The Impact of Climate Change and Window Parameters on Energy Demand and CO 2 Emissions in a Building with Various Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Fu-Wing Yu & Wai-Tung Ho, 2023. "Time Series Forecast of Cooling Demand for Sustainable Chiller System in an Office Building in a Subtropical Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2020. "Development of Weighting Scheme for Indoor Air Quality Model Using a Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    7. Piotr Michalak, 2021. "Selected Aspects of Indoor Climate in a Passive Office Building with a Thermally Activated Building System: A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    2. Kariminia, Shahab & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Motamedi, Shervin & Hashim, Roslan & Roy, Chandrabhushan, 2016. "A systematic extreme learning machine approach to analyze visitors׳ thermal comfort at a public urban space," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 751-760.
    3. Ma, Nan & Aviv, Dorit & Guo, Hongshan & Braham, William W., 2021. "Measuring the right factors: A review of variables and models for thermal comfort and indoor air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Laura J. Elstub & Shimra J. Fine & Karl E. Zelik, 2021. "Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Lazaros Mavromatidis, 2022. "Constructal Evaluation of Polynomial Meta-Models for Dynamic Thermal Absorptivity Forecasting for Mixed-Mode nZEB Heritage Building Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Ribeiro, Thatiana Jessica da Silva & Mady, Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian, 2022. "Comparison among exergy analysis methods applied to a human body thermal model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    7. Bruno Malet-Damour & Jean-Pierre Habas & Dimitri Bigot, 2023. "Is Loose-Fill Plastic Waste an Opportunity for Thermal Insulation in Cold and Humid Tropical Climates?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Djamila, Harimi, 2017. "Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-580.
    9. Francesco Asdrubali & Cinzia Buratti & Franco Cotana & Giorgio Baldinelli & Michele Goretti & Elisa Moretti & Catia Baldassarri & Elisa Belloni & Francesco Bianchi & Antonella Rotili & Marco Vergoni &, 2013. "Evaluation of Green Buildings’ Overall Performance through in Situ Monitoring and Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    11. Feng, Yanxiao & Liu, Shichao & Wang, Julian & Yang, Jing & Jao, Ying-Ling & Wang, Nan, 2022. "Data-driven personal thermal comfort prediction: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Michael Short & Sergio Rodriguez & Richard Charlesworth & Tracey Crosbie & Nashwan Dawood, 2019. "Optimal Dispatch of Aggregated HVAC Units for Demand Response: An Industry 4.0 Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    14. Escandón, Rocío & Suárez, Rafael & Sendra, Juan José, 2019. "Field assessment of thermal comfort conditions and energy performance of social housing: The case of hot summers in the Mediterranean climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 377-392.
    15. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    16. Haider Latif & Samira Rahnama & Alessandro Maccarini & Goran Hultmark & Peter V. Nielsen & Alireza Afshari, 2022. "Precision Ventilation in an Open-Plan Office: A New Application of Active Chilled Beam (ACB) with a JetCone Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Piotr Michalak, 2021. "Selected Aspects of Indoor Climate in a Passive Office Building with a Thermally Activated Building System: A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Omar al-Ani & Sanjoy Das & Hongyu Wu, 2023. "Imitation Learning with Deep Attentive Tabular Neural Networks for Environmental Prediction and Control in Smart Home," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Yuan, Jihui & Huang, Pei & Chai, Jiale, 2022. "Development of a calibrated typical meteorological year weather file in system design of zero-energy building for performance improvements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1481-:d:335118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.