IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2140-d1077137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Separation for an Innovative Energy Concept towards Low-Emission Glass Melting

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Gärtner

    (Research Center on Energy Transmission and Energy Storage (FENES), Technical University of Applied Sciences (OTH) Regensburg, Seybothstrasse 2, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
    Chair of Regenerative Energy Systems (RES), Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University Munich, Schulgasse 16, 94315 Straubing, Germany)

  • Thomas Marx-Schubach

    (XRG Simulation GmbH, Harburger Schlossstrasse 6-12, 21079 Hamburg, Germany
    Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 15, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Matthias Gaderer

    (Chair of Regenerative Energy Systems (RES), Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University Munich, Schulgasse 16, 94315 Straubing, Germany)

  • Gerhard Schmitz

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 15, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Michael Sterner

    (Research Center on Energy Transmission and Energy Storage (FENES), Technical University of Applied Sciences (OTH) Regensburg, Seybothstrasse 2, 93053 Regensburg, Germany)

Abstract

The currently still high fossil energy demand is forcing the glass industry to search for innovative approaches for the reduction in CO 2 emissions and the integration of renewable energy sources. In this paper, a novel power-to-methane concept is presented and discussed for this purpose. A special focus is on methods for the required CO 2 capture from typical flue gases in the glass industry, which have hardly been explored to date. To close this research gap, process simulation models are developed to investigate post-combustion CO 2 capture by absorption processes, followed by a techno-economic evaluation. Due to reduced flue gas volume, the designed CO 2 capture plant is found to be much smaller (40 m 3 absorber column volume) than absorption-based CO 2 separation processes for power plants (12,560 m 3 absorber column volume). As there are many options for waste heat utilization in the glass industry, the waste heat required for CO 2 desorption can be generated in a particularly efficient and cost-effective way. The resulting CO 2 separation costs range between 41 and 42 EUR/t CO 2 , depending on waste heat utilization for desorption. These costs are below the values of 50–65 EUR/t CO 2 for comparable industrial applications. Despite these promising economic results, there are still some technical restrictions in terms of solvent degradation due to the high oxygen content in flue gas compositions. The results of this study point towards parametric studies for approaching these issues, such as the use of secondary and tertiary amines as solvents, or the optimization of operating conditions such as stripper pressure for further cost reductions potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Gärtner & Thomas Marx-Schubach & Matthias Gaderer & Gerhard Schmitz & Michael Sterner, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Separation for an Innovative Energy Concept towards Low-Emission Glass Melting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2140-:d:1077137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2140/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2140/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon Aforkoghene Aromada & Nils Henrik Eldrup & Fredrik Normann & Lars Erik Øi, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Different Heat Exchangers for CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Ghaib, Karim & Ben-Fares, Fatima-Zahrae, 2018. "Power-to-Methane: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 433-446.
    3. Wesseling, J.H. & Lechtenböhmer, S. & Åhman, M. & Nilsson, L.J. & Worrell, E. & Coenen, L., 2017. "The transition of energy intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization: Characteristics and implications for future research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1303-1313.
    4. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    5. Schmitz, Andreas & Kaminski, Jacek & Maria Scalet, Bianca & Soria, Antonio, 2011. "Energy consumption and CO2 emissions of the European glass industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 142-155, January.
    6. Gorre, Jachin & Ruoss, Fabian & Karjunen, Hannu & Schaffert, Johannes & Tynjälä, Tero, 2020. "Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for Power-to-Gas plants in dynamic operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gong, Yuanchao & Zhang, Shiyi & Lun, Xiaoyu & Sun, Yan, 2024. "Just transition as practitioners’ acceptance of technical solutions to decarbonize: Insights from the glass manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Xiong, Bobby & Predel, Johannes & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud, 2021. "Spatial flexibility in redispatch: Supporting low carbon energy systems with Power-to-Gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Hidalgo, D. & Martín-Marroquín, J.M., 2020. "Power-to-methane, coupling CO2 capture with fuel production: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Corey Duncan & Robin Roche & Samir Jemei & Marie-Cécile Péra, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Post-Print hal-03692975, HAL.
    6. Nyangon, Joseph & Darekar, Ayesha, 2024. "Advancements in hydrogen energy systems: A review of levelized costs, financial incentives and technological innovations," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    7. Sayama, Shogo & Yamamoto, Seiji, 2022. "A 6-kW thermally self-sustained two-stage CO2 methanation reactor: design and experimental evaluation of steady-state performance under full-load conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    8. Rishabh Agarwal, 2022. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Power-to-Gas in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Pignataro, Valeria & Liponi, Angelica & Bargiacchi, Eleonora & Ferrari, Lorenzo, 2024. "Dynamic model of a power-to-gas system: Role of hydrogen storage and management strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Ghafoori, Mohammad Samim & Loubar, Khaled & Marin-Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand, 2022. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and thermoeconomic analysis of a power to gas system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Maeder, Mattia & Weiss, Olga & Boulouchos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Assessing the need for flexibility technologies in decarbonized power systems: A new model applied to Central Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    13. Johannes Schaffert & Hans Christian Gils & Max Fette & Hedda Gardian & Christine Brandstätt & Thomas Pregger & Nils Brücken & Eren Tali & Marc Fiebrandt & Rolf Albus & Frank Burmeister, 2022. "Integrating System and Operator Perspectives for the Evaluation of Power-to-Gas Plants in the Future German Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Möhren, S. & Meyer, J. & Krause, H. & Saars, L., 2021. "A multiperiod approach for waste heat and renewable energy integration of industrial sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Upadhyay, Mukesh & Kim, Ayeon & Paramanantham, SalaiSargunan S. & Kim, Heehyang & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Sunyoung & Moon, Sangbong & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Three-dimensional CFD simulation of proton exchange membrane water electrolyser: Performance assessment under different condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    16. Inkeri, Eero & Tynjälä, Tero & Karjunen, Hannu, 2021. "Significance of methanation reactor dynamics on the annual efficiency of power-to-gas -system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1113-1126.
    17. Hermesmann, M. & Grübel, K. & Scherotzki, L. & Müller, T.E., 2021. "Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Kim, Jeongdong & Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Moon, Il, 2023. "Revealing the impact of renewable uncertainty on grid-assisted power-to-X: A data-driven reliability-based design optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    19. Pintér, Gábor, 2024. "The development of global power-to-methane potentials between 2000 and 2020: A comparative overview of international projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    20. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Foley, Aoife M. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the glass industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2140-:d:1077137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.