IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5724-d438794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the Heat Loss Coefficient of Two Occupied Residential Buildings through an Average Method

Author

Listed:
  • Irati Uriarte

    (ENEDI Research Group, Department of Energy Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Aitor Erkoreka

    (ENEDI Research Group, Department of Energy Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Pablo Eguia

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Heat Engines and Fluid Mechanics, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

  • Enrique Granada

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Heat Engines and Fluid Mechanics, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

  • Koldo Martin-Escudero

    (ENEDI Research Group, Department of Energy Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain)

Abstract

The existing performance gap between the design and the real energy consumption of a building could have three main origins: the occupants’ behaviour, the performance of the energy systems and the performance of the building envelope. Through the estimation of the in-use Heat Loss Coefficient (HLC), it is possible to characterise the building’s envelope energy performance under occupied conditions. In this research, the estimation of the HLC of two individual residential buildings located in Gainsborough and Loughborough (UK) was carried out using an average method. This average method was developed and successfully tested in previous research for an occupied four-story office building with very different characteristics to individual residential buildings. Furthermore, one of the analysed residential buildings is a new, well-insulated building, while the other represents the old, poorly insulated semidetached residential building typology. Thus, the monitored data provided were filtered in order to apply the abovementioned average method. Even without fulfilling all the average method requirements for these two residential buildings, the method provides reliable HLC values for both residential buildings. For the house in Gainsborough, the best estimated HLC value was 60.2 W/K, while the best approach for Loughborough was 366.6 W/K. Thus, despite the uncertainty sources found during the analysis, the method seems promising for its application to residential buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Irati Uriarte & Aitor Erkoreka & Pablo Eguia & Enrique Granada & Koldo Martin-Escudero, 2020. "Estimation of the Heat Loss Coefficient of Two Occupied Residential Buildings through an Average Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5724-:d:438794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menezes, Anna Carolina & Cripps, Andrew & Bouchlaghem, Dino & Buswell, Richard, 2012. "Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 355-364.
    2. Hemsath, Timothy L. & Alagheband Bandhosseini, Kaveh, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis evaluating basic building geometry's effect on energy use," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 526-538.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santu Golder & Ramadas Narayanan & Md. Rashed Hossain & Mohammad Rofiqul Islam, 2021. "Experimental and CFD Investigation on the Application for Aerogel Insulation in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habtamu Tkubet Ebuy & Hind Bril El Haouzi & Riad Benelmir & Remi Pannequin, 2023. "Occupant Behavior Impact on Building Sustainability Performance: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Anti Hamburg & Targo Kalamees, 2018. "The Influence of Energy Renovation on the Change of Indoor Temperature and Energy Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Jakob Carlander & Bahram Moshfegh & Jan Akander & Fredrik Karlsson, 2020. "Effects on Energy Demand in an Office Building Considering Location, Orientation, Façade Design and Internal Heat Gains—A Parametric Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Alencastro, João & Fuertes, Alba & de Wilde, Pieter, 2018. "The relationship between quality defects and the thermal performance of buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 883-894.
    5. Prasanna, Ashreeta & Dorer, Viktor & Vetterli, Nadège, 2017. "Optimisation of a district energy system with a low temperature network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 632-648.
    6. Zhong, Shengyuan & Zhao, Jun & Li, Wenjia & Li, Hao & Deng, Shuai & Li, Yang & Hussain, Sajjad & Wang, Xiaoyuan & Zhu, Jiebei, 2021. "Quantitative analysis of information interaction in building energy systems based on mutual information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Eugene Mohareb & Arman Hashemi & Mehdi Shahrestani & Minna Sunikka-Blank, 2017. "Retrofit Planning for the Performance Gap: Results of a Workshop on Addressing Energy, Health and Comfort Needs in a Protected Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Lee, Junghun & Kim, Jeonggook & Song, Doosam & Kim, Jonghun & Jang, Cheolyong, 2017. "Impact of external insulation and internal thermal density upon energy consumption of buildings in a temperate climate with four distinct seasons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1081-1088.
    9. Pierryves Padey & Kyriaki Goulouti & Guy Wagner & Blaise Périsset & Sébastien Lasvaux, 2021. "Understanding the Reasons behind the Energy Performance Gap of an Energy-Efficient Building, through a Probabilistic Approach and On-Site Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Abdelkader Sarri & Saleh Nasser Al-Saadi & Müslüm Arıcı & Djamel Bechki & Hamza Bouguettaia, 2023. "Architectural Design Strategies for Enhancement of Thermal and Energy Performance of PCMs-Embedded Envelope System for an Office Building in a Typical Arid Saharan Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Gupta, Rajat & Kotopouleas, Alkis, 2018. "Magnitude and extent of building fabric thermal performance gap in UK low energy housing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 673-686.
    12. Wang, Lan & Lee, Eric W.M. & Hussian, Syed Asad & Yuen, Anthony Chun Yin & Feng, Wei, 2021. "Quantitative impact analysis of driving factors on annual residential building energy end-use combining machine learning and stochastic methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    13. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    14. Abdulazeez Rotimi & Ali Bahadori-Jahromi & Anastasia Mylona & Paulina Godfrey & Darren Cook, 2017. "Estimation and Validation of Energy Consumption in UK Existing Hotel Building Using Dynamic Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Li, Xinyi & Yao, Runming & Li, Qin & Ding, Yong & Li, Baizhan, 2018. "An object-oriented energy benchmark for the evaluation of the office building stock," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Qadeer Ali & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Fahim Ullah & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2020. "The Performance Gap in Energy-Efficient Office Buildings: How the Occupants Can Help?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    18. Ji, Changyoon & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Hakpyeong, 2022. "Statistical analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of South Korean residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Zulay Giménez & Claudio Mourgues & Luis F. Alarcón & Harrison Mesa & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Naylor, Sophie & Gillott, Mark & Lau, Tom, 2018. "A review of occupant-centric building control strategies to reduce building energy use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5724-:d:438794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.