IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5618-d435473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers for and Barriers to the Take up of Floating Offshore Wind Technology: A Comparison of Scotland and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kubiat Umoh

    (School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Gateway House, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK)

  • Mark Lemon

    (School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Gateway House, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK)

Abstract

Offshore wind could both play a significant role in decarbonising the global energy system and supporting the energy needs of cities. Recent trends in offshore wind have seen the installation of turbines in deeper and more remote waters due to the presence of stronger and more consistent wind resources. This has led to the development of floating foundations for turbine mounting in water depths above 40 m, where conventional bottom-fixed foundations are not considered economically feasible. However, due to its emerging nature, floating wind must attain market maturity to be considered cost competitive. It is a widely accepted belief that market expansion yields technological maturity. Therefore, this paper adopts a systems approach to investigate the viability of floating offshore wind power generation in Scotland and South Africa. It does this through a content analysis of relevant secondary documentation, including policy documents, industry reports, press releases, online publications, and databases to determine the drivers and barriers of floating wind in the case contexts. The key findings are that substantial technical potential is required to attract floating wind investments, political support is necessary in order to scale up, a strong offshore wind supply chain could cushion the high-cost effects of floating wind projects, and more innovative business models such as corporate Power Purchasing Agreements could serve as social drivers for such projects. The main contextual conclusions drawn from this paper are that Scotland’s inaugural floating wind projects benefitted from the Scottish government’s Renewable Obligation scheme, however its discontinuation threatens the prospects of future projects. Alternatively, South Africa’s technical potential, coupled with its government’s healthy appetite for renewable energy development, could see the take up of this technology in the near future, with corresponding benefits for more sustainable energy in densely populated areas, compliant with SDG 7.

Suggested Citation

  • Kubiat Umoh & Mark Lemon, 2020. "Drivers for and Barriers to the Take up of Floating Offshore Wind Technology: A Comparison of Scotland and South Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5618-:d:435473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kruger, Wikus & Stritzke, Susann & Trotter, Philipp A., 2019. "De-risking solar auctions in sub-Saharan Africa – A comparison of site selection strategies in South Africa and Zambia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 429-438.
    2. Julien Lefevre & Aurélie Méjean & Céline Guivarch & Meriem Hamdi-Cherif, 2018. "The transition in energy demand sectors to limit global warming to 1.5◦C," Post-Print hal-03128551, HAL.
    3. T. Gasser & C. Guivarch & K. Tachiiri & C. D. Jones & P. Ciais, 2015. "Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, November.
    4. Elsner, Paul, 2019. "Continental-scale assessment of the African offshore wind energy potential: Spatial analysis of an under-appreciated renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 394-407.
    5. Liddle, Brantley & Sadorsky, Perry, 2017. "How much does increasing non-fossil fuels in electricity generation reduce carbon dioxide emissions?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 212-221.
    6. Kaldellis, J.K. & Kapsali, M., 2013. "Shifting towards offshore wind energy—Recent activity and future development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 136-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rohit Agrawal & Abhijit Majumdar & Kirty Majumdar & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3669-3687, November.
    2. Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2022. "Advances in Floating Wind Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-3, August.
    3. Xusheng Shen & Tao Xie & Tianzhen Wang, 2020. "A Fuzzy Adaptative Backstepping Control Strategy for Marine Current Turbine under Disturbances and Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Iurii Prokazov & Vladimir Gorbanyov & Vadim Samusenkov & Irina Razinkina & Monika Chłąd, 2021. "Assessing the Flexibility of Renewable Energy Multinational Corporations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Rinaldi, Giovanni & Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Jeffrey, Henry & Thies, Philipp R. & Johanning, Lars, 2021. "Incorporating stochastic operation and maintenance models into the techno-economic analysis of floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    6. Iben Ringvej Dahl & Bård Wathne Tveiten & Emily Cowan, 2022. "The Case for Policy in Developing Offshore Wind: Lessons from Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knopf, Brigitte & Nahmmacher, Paul & Schmid, Eva, 2015. "The European renewable energy target for 2030 – An impact assessment of the electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 50-60.
    2. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    3. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat, 2022. "Intelligent Optimized Wind Turbine Cost Analysis for Different Wind Sites in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Ragab El-Sehiemy & Mohamed A. Hamida & Ehab Elattar & Abdullah Shaheen & Ahmed Ginidi, 2022. "Nonlinear Dynamic Model for Parameter Estimation of Li-Ion Batteries Using Supply–Demand Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Chen, Yifeng & Khokarale, Santosh Govind & Bui, Thai Q. & Weiland, Fredrik & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Rudolfsson, Magnus & Mikkola, Jyri-Pekka & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Towards negative carbon emissions: Carbon capture in bio-syngas from gasification by aqueous pentaethylenehexamine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Zhou, Hui & Park, Ah-Hyung Alissa, 2020. "Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage via alkaline thermal Treatment: Production of high purity H2 from wet wheat straw grass with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Gregory Casey, 2024. "Energy Efficiency and Directed Technical Change: Implications for Climate Change Mitigation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(1), pages 192-228.
    8. Hadi Tannous & Valentina Stojceska & Savas A. Tassou, 2023. "The Use of Solar Thermal Heating in SPIRE and Non-SPIRE Industrial Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Wang Lu & Pietro Bartocci & Alberto Abad & Aldo Bischi & Haiping Yang & Arturo Cabello & Margarita de Las Obras Loscertales & Mauro Zampilli & Francesco Fantozzi, 2023. "Dimensioning Air Reactor and Fuel Reactor of a Pressurized CLC Plant to Be Coupled to a Gas Turbine: Part 2, the Fuel Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Claudia Gutiérrez & Alba de la Vara & Juan Jesús González-Alemán & Miguel Ángel Gaertner, 2021. "Impact of Climate Change on Wind and Photovoltaic Energy Resources in the Canary Islands and Adjacent Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Brantley Liddle, 2024. "To What Extent Do Alternative Energy Sources Displace Coal and Oil in Electricity Generation? A Mean-Group Panel Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Tiam Kapen, Pascalin & Jeutho Gouajio, Marinette & Yemélé, David, 2020. "Analysis and efficient comparison of ten numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy potential: Application to the city of Bafoussam, Cameroon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1188-1198.
    13. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1121-1130.
    14. Lingqian Meng & Hongyan Ding, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Contact Force between the Vessel and CBF in the Integrated Floating Transportation Process of Offshore Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-10, October.
    15. Michele Bertone & Luca Stabile & Giorgio Buonanno, 2024. "An Overview of Waste-to-Energy Incineration Integrated with Carbon Capture Utilization or Storage Retrofit Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Li, Wei & Lu, Can & Zhang, Yan-Wu, 2019. "Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 45-56.
    17. Yang, J.J. & He, E.M., 2020. "Coupled modeling and structural vibration control for floating offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 678-694.
    18. Dhunny, A.Z. & Timmons, D.S. & Allam, Z. & Lollchund, M.R. & Cunden, T.S.M., 2020. "An economic assessment of near-shore wind farm development using a weather research forecast-based genetic algorithm model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Peter Tauš & Martin Beer, 2022. "Evaluation of the Hydropower Potential of the Torysa River and Its Energy Use in the Process of Reducing Energy Poverty of Local Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Holly Jean Buck, 2016. "Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 155-167, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5618-:d:435473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.