IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5213-d424450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain-Enabled Demand Response Scheme with Individualized Incentive Pricing Mode

Author

Listed:
  • Zishan Guo

    (School of Electrical and Automatic Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Nanjing 210097, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Gas and Electrical Energy, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Nanjing 210097, China)

  • Zhenya Ji

    (School of Electrical and Automatic Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Nanjing 210097, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Gas and Electrical Energy, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Nanjing 210097, China)

  • Qi Wang

    (School of Electrical and Automatic Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Nanjing 210097, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Gas and Electrical Energy, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Nanjing 210097, China)

Abstract

Demand response (DR) can offer a wide range of advantages for electrical systems by facilitating the interaction and balance between supply and demand. However, DR always requires a central agent, giving rise to issues of security and trust. Besides this, differences in user response cost characteristics are not taken into consideration during incentive pricing, which would affect the equal participation of users in DR and increase the costs borne by the electricity retail company. In this paper, a blockchain-enabled DR scheme with an individualized incentive pricing mode is proposed. First, a blockchain-enabled DR framework is proposed to promote the secure implementation of DR. Next, a dual-incentive mechanism is designed to successfully implement the blockchain to DR, which consists of a profit-based and a contribution-based model. An individualized incentive pricing mode is adopted in the profit-based model to decrease the imbalance in response frequency of users and reduce the costs borne by the electricity retail company. Then, the Stackelberg game model is constructed and Differential Evolution (DE) is used to produce equilibrium optimal individualized incentive prices. Finally, case studies are conducted. The results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can reduce the cost borne by the electricity retail company and decrease the imbalance among users in response frequency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zishan Guo & Zhenya Ji & Qi Wang, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Demand Response Scheme with Individualized Incentive Pricing Mode," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5213-:d:424450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zilong Zeng & Yong Li & Yijia Cao & Yirui Zhao & Junjie Zhong & Denis Sidorov & Xiangcheng Zeng, 2020. "Blockchain Technology for Information Security of the Energy Internet: Fundamentals, Features, Strategy and Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Ah-Yun Yoon & Hyun-Koo Kang & Seung-II Moon, 2020. "Optimal Price Based Demand Response of HVAC Systems in Commercial Buildings Considering Peak Load Reduction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Noor, Sana & Yang, Wentao & Guo, Miao & van Dam, Koen H. & Wang, Xiaonan, 2018. "Energy Demand Side Management within micro-grid networks enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1385-1398.
    4. Iria, José & Soares, Filipe & Matos, Manuel, 2018. "Optimal supply and demand bidding strategy for an aggregator of small prosumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 658-669.
    5. Jimyung Kang & Jee-Hyong Lee, 2017. "Data-Driven Optimization of Incentive-based Demand Response System with Uncertain Responses of Customers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Jiang, Yanni & Zhou, Kaile & Lu, Xinhui & Yang, Shanlin, 2020. "Electricity trading pricing among prosumers with game theory-based model in energy blockchain environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Yong Yang & Rong Li, 2020. "Techno-Economic Optimization of an Off-Grid Solar/Wind/Battery Hybrid System with a Novel Multi-Objective Differential Evolution Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Althaher, Sereen Z. & Alnaser, Sahban W. & Long, Chao & Zhou, Yue, 2024. "Introducing storage operators for coordinating residential batteries in distribution networks under time-of-use tariffs and adaptive power limits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    2. Volpato, Gabriele & Carraro, Gianluca & Cont, Marco & Danieli, Piero & Rech, Sergio & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2022. "General guidelines for the optimal economic aggregation of prosumers in energy communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Evgenia Kapassa & Marinos Themistocleous, 2022. "Blockchain Technology Applied in IoV Demand Response Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Zhenya Ji & Zishan Guo & Hao Li & Qi Wang, 2021. "Automated Scheduling Approach under Smart Contract for Remote Wind Farms with Power-to-Gas Systems in Multiple Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Seyedhossein, Seyed Saeed & Moeini-Aghtaie, Moein, 2022. "Risk management framework of peer-to-peer electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    3. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Roth, Tamara & Utz, Manuel & Baumgarte, Felix & Rieger, Alexander & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Strüker, Jens, 2022. "Electricity powered by blockchain: A review with a European perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    5. Turki Alsuwian & Aiman Shahid Butt & Arslan Ahmed Amin, 2022. "Smart Grid Cyber Security Enhancement: Challenges and Solutions—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Muhammad Waseem & Muhammad Adnan Khan & Arman Goudarzi & Shah Fahad & Intisar Ali Sajjad & Pierluigi Siano, 2023. "Incorporation of Blockchain Technology for Different Smart Grid Applications: Architecture, Prospects, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Xia, Wanjun & Murshed, Muntasir & Khan, Zeeshan & Chen, Zhenling & Ferraz, Diogo, 2022. "Exploring the nexus between fiscal decentralization and energy poverty for China: Does country risk matter for energy poverty reduction?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Dániel István Németh & Kálmán Tornai, 2023. "Electrical Load Classification with Open-Set Recognition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Benioudakis, Myron & Zissis, Dimitris & Burnetas, Apostolos & Ioannou, George, 2023. "Service provision on an aggregator platform with time-sensitive customers: Pricing strategies and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    10. Gayo-Abeleira, Miguel & Santos, Carlos & Javier Rodríguez Sánchez, Francisco & Martín, Pedro & Antonio Jiménez, José & Santiso, Enrique, 2022. "Aperiodic two-layer energy management system for community microgrids based on blockchain strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    11. Maarten Evens & Patricia Ercoli & Alessia Arteconi, 2023. "Blockchain-Enabled Microgrids: Toward Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading and Flexible Demand Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2021. "Toward sustainable microgrids with blockchain technology-based peer-to-peer energy trading mechanism: A fuzzy meta-heuristic approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Liu, Jia & Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Li, Yutong, 2020. "Energy storage and management system design optimization for a photovoltaic integrated low-energy building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Shengmin Tan & Xu Wang & Chuanwen Jiang, 2019. "Privacy-Preserving Energy Scheduling for ESCOs Based on Energy Blockchain Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Nizami, M.S.H. & Hossain, M.J. & Amin, B.M. Ruhul & Fernandez, Edstan, 2020. "A residential energy management system with bi-level optimization-based bidding strategy for day-ahead bi-directional electricity trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    16. Xiu Guan & Xiang Feng & A.Y.M. Atiquil Islam, 2023. "The dilemma and countermeasures of educational data ethics in the age of intelligence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Tarashandeh, Nader & Karimi, Ali, 2024. "Peer-to-peer energy trading under distribution network constraints with preserving independent nature of agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    18. Huang, Z.F. & Soh, K.Y. & Islam, M.R. & Chua, K.J., 2023. "Development of a novel grid-free district cooling system considering blockchain-based demand response management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    19. Ioanna Andreoulaki & Aikaterini Papapostolou & Vangelis Marinakis, 2024. "Evaluating the Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Energy Sector: A Multicriteria Approach Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Group Decision Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, March.
    20. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5213-:d:424450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.