IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4738-d412085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical Modeling and Pointwise Validation of a Spouted Bed Using an Enhanced Bed Elasticity Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastián Uribe

    (Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Binbin Qi

    (Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Omar Farid

    (Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Muthanna Al-Dahhan

    (Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
    Mining and Nuclear Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

Abstract

With a Euler–Euler (E2P) approach, a mathematical model for predicting the pointwise hydrodynamic behavior of a spouted bed was implemented though computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques. The model considered a bed elasticity approach in order to reduce the number of required sub-models to provide closure for the solids stress strain-tensor. However, no modulus of elasticity sub-model for a bed elasticity approach has been developed for spouted beds, and thus, large deviations in the predictions are obtained with common sub-models reported in literature. To overcome such a limitation, a new modulus of elasticity based on a sensitivity analysis was developed and implemented on the E2P model. The model predictions were locally validated against experimental measurements obtained in previous studies. The experimental studies were conducted using our in-house developed advanced γ-ray computed tomography (CT) technique, which allows to obtain the cross-sectional time-averaged solids holdup distribution. When comparing the model predictions against the experimental measurements, a high predictive quality for the radial solids holdup distribution in the spout and annulus regions is observed. The model predicts most of the experimental measurements for different particle diameters, different static bed heights, and different inlet velocities with deviations under 15%, with average absolute relative errors (AARE) between 5.75% and 7.26%, and mean squared deviations (MSD) between 0.11% and 0.24%

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastián Uribe & Binbin Qi & Omar Farid & Muthanna Al-Dahhan, 2020. "Mathematical Modeling and Pointwise Validation of a Spouted Bed Using an Enhanced Bed Elasticity Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4738-:d:412085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Moliner & Filippo Marchelli & Barbara Bosio & Elisabetta Arato, 2017. "Modelling of Spouted and Spout-Fluid Beds: Key for Their Successful Scale Up," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, October.
    2. Cortazar, M. & Lopez, G. & Alvarez, J. & Amutio, M. & Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M., 2018. "Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 455-463.
    3. Aguado, Roberto & Saldarriaga, Juan F. & Atxutegi, Aitor & Bilbao, Javier & Olazar, Martin, 2019. "Influence of the kinetic scheme and heat balance on the modelling of biomass combustion in a conical spouted bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 758-767.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arabiourrutia, Miriam & Lopez, Gartzen & Artetxe, Maite & Alvarez, Jon & Bilbao, Javier & Olazar, Martin, 2020. "Waste tyre valorization by catalytic pyrolysis – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Yang, Shiliang & Fan, Feihu & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Particle-scale evaluation of the biomass steam-gasification process in a conical spouted bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 844-860.
    3. Suarez, Mayra Alejandra & Januszewicz, Katarzyna & Cortazar, Maria & Lopez, Gartzen & Santamaria, Laura & Olazar, Martin & Artetxe, Maite & Amutio, Maider, 2024. "Selective H2 production from plastic waste through pyrolysis and in-line oxidative steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    4. Francisco Rodríguez & Yuby Cruz & Idoia Estiati & Juan F. Saldarriaga, 2019. "Kinetic Study of Corn and Sugarcane Waste Oxidative Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, December.
    5. He, Qing & Guo, Qinghua & Umeki, Kentaro & Ding, Lu & Wang, Fuchen & Yu, Guangsuo, 2021. "Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Wojciech Jerzak & Esther Acha & Bin Li, 2024. "Comprehensive Review of Biomass Pyrolysis: Conventional and Advanced Technologies, Reactor Designs, Product Compositions and Yields, and Techno-Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Yang, Shiliang & Dong, Ruihan & Du, Yanxiang & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Hua, 2021. "Numerical study of the biomass pyrolysis process in a spouted bed reactor through computational fluid dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Ayiguzhali Tuluhong & Qingpu Chang & Lirong Xie & Zhisen Xu & Tengfei Song, 2024. "Current Status of Green Hydrogen Production Technology: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-47, October.
    9. Filippo Marchelli & Massimo Curti & Mattia Tognin & Giorgio Rovero & Cristina Moliner & Elisabetta Arato & Barbara Bosio, 2020. "Experimental Study on the Solids Residence Time Distribution in Multiple Square-Based Spouted Beds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Cortazar, M. & Lopez, G. & Alvarez, J. & Amutio, M. & Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M., 2018. "Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 455-463.
    11. Sun, Haoran & Yang, Shiliang & Bao, Guirong & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2023. "Numerical evaluation of multi-scale properties in biomass fast pyrolysis in fountain confined conical spouted bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Fernandez, Enara & Santamaria, Laura & Amutio, Maider & Artetxe, Maite & Arregi, Aitor & Lopez, Gartzen & Bilbao, Javier & Olazar, Martin, 2022. "Role of temperature in the biomass steam pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    13. Benedikt, F. & Schmid, J.C. & Fuchs, J. & Mauerhofer, A.M. & Müller, S. & Hofbauer, H., 2018. "Fuel flexible gasification with an advanced 100 kW dual fluidized bed steam gasification pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 329-343.
    14. Dal-Bó, Vanessa & Lira, Taisa & Arrieche, Leonardo & Bacelos, Marcelo, 2019. "Process synthesis for coffee husks to energy using hierarchical approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 195-206.
    15. Filippo Marchelli & Giorgio Rovero & Massimo Curti & Elisabetta Arato & Barbara Bosio & Cristina Moliner, 2021. "An Integrated Approach to Convert Lignocellulosic and Wool Residues into Balanced Fertilisers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Korshunov, Alexey & Kichatov, Boris & Melnikova, Ksenia & Gubernov, Vladimir & Yakovenko, Ivan & Kiverin, Alexey & Golubkov, Alexandr, 2019. "Pyrolysis characteristics of biomass torrefied in a quiescent mineral layer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Stéphane Abanades & Sylvain Rodat & Houssame Boujjat, 2021. "Solar Thermochemical Green Fuels Production: A Review of Biomass Pyro-Gasification, Solar Reactor Concepts and Modelling Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4738-:d:412085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.